Special Issue

## Advanced Modeling in Stochastic Computational Electromagnetics

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2018 |Article ID 7397592 | 9 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/7397592

# A Kind of Stochastic Eigenvalue Complementarity Problems

Revised22 Dec 2017
Accepted23 Jan 2018
Published20 Feb 2018

#### Abstract

With the development of computer science, computational electromagnetics have also been widely used. Electromagnetic phenomena are closely related to eigenvalue problems. On the other hand, in order to solve the uncertainty of input data, the stochastic eigenvalue complementarity problem, which is a general formulation for the eigenvalue complementarity problem, has aroused interest in research. So, in this paper, we propose a new kind of stochastic eigenvalue complementarity problem. We reformulate the given stochastic eigenvalue complementarity problem as a system of nonsmooth equations with nonnegative constraints. Then, a projected smoothing Newton method is presented to solve it. The global and local convergence properties of the given method for solving the proposed stochastic eigenvalue complementarity problem are also given. Finally, the related numerical results show that the proposed method is efficient.

#### 1. Introduction

Computational electromagnetics is a science, which spans many subjects. It is an organic combination of mathematical theory, electromagnetic theory, and computer science. Electromagnetism is the classical dynamics theory. Electromagnetic phenomena are also closely related to eigenvalue problems and essentially can be deduced by Maxwell eigenvalue equation. The typical eigenvalue problem of the electromagnetic field is the resonant problem of the cavity and the guide wave problem of the waveguide. No matter the resonance problem of closed cavity, or the propagation problem of uniform guided waves, the wave equation is homogeneous without considering any source or field excitation process. For simplification, the conductors that constitute the cavity are idealized. So the field satisfies the homogeneous boundary condition on the boundary. There are many methods for solving computational electromagnetics, such as finite difference method and finite element method; see literatures  for details. In recent years, various methods in computational electromagnetics have been continuously improved. However, the input data are usually affected by many uncertain factors, such as the environment, which often results in the difference between calculation and measurement. So, we consider establishing a new model to solve some related electromagnetics problems. This is also the motivation of this paper.

Among the optimization model, as we all know, the eigenvalue complementarity problem arises from several important applications in engineering and physics, such as the study of the resonance frequency and the stability of dynamic systems. In the last few years, the eigenvalue complementarity problem has drawn increasing attention, in many literature systems, such as  and the references therein. Among them, in , the authors study an eigenvalue complementarity problem and find its origins in the solution of a contract problem in mechanics. In , the eigenvalue complementarity problems with symmetric real matrices are considered. The authors transform this problem into a differentiable optimization program involving the Rayleigh quotient on a simplex and find its stationary point by the spectral projected gradient algorithm. In , many methods are proposed to solve the eigenvalue complementarity problems, such as Levenberg-Marquardt method and the derivative-free projection method. In , the stability of dynamic system is studied. The model of eigenvalue complementarity problem is established and the finite element method is used to solve the model.

On the other hand, the stochastic linear complementarity problems, stochastic nonlinear complementarity problems, and some related stochastic optimization problems attract many researchers’ attention. And a lot of related theories and algorithms are given, such as  and their references. The expected value (EV) to reformulate the problems is usually used. Many methods are effectual for solving the stochastic complementarity problems. The global and local convergence of these methods are also given. Besides, the expected residual minimization (ERM) also can reformulate the stochastic complementarity problems, such as those in . And the stochastic complementarity problems are eventually transformed into a certain minimal problem with constraints.

In order to reduce the difference between calculation and measurement in computational electromagnetics, we consider getting the approximate distribution, by statistics, of a large number of experimental data and establishing a new stochastic model. So, in this paper, we propose a new kind of stochastic eigenvalue complementarity problem and the smoothing Newton method is also proposed to solve the given problem.

Denote as a probability space with , where the probability distribution is known. The new kind of stochastic eigenvalue complementarity problem is to find a scalar and a vector , such thatwhere and are symmetric positive definite stochastic matrices, is the probability space, and is a random vector given in probability distribution .

The rest of this paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we reformulate problem (1) as a nonsmooth system firstly and give the related preliminary results. In Section 3, we present the projected smoothing Newton method and give the convergence results. In Section 4, some preliminary numerical results are proposed. The last section is the conclusion.

#### 2. Preliminary Results

In this section, we give the reformulation of problem (1) and some related preliminaries.

Firstly, we consider using the expected value model to solve (1) as the following equations.

Denotewhere So (1) is equivalent to the problem, which is defined as

As (3) is a linear complementarity problem, we can use the complementarity functions to transform it. The complementarity function has many different forms, such as the functions given in . Among them, the Fischer-Burmeister (FB) functionis used widely. By the FB function transformation, (3) is equivalent to , where

In this paper, we consider using the smoothing Fischer-Burmeister function, which is differentiable at any point. This smoothing method, which is an important method to solve nonsmooth problems, has been widely used in recent years, such as in . The idea of a smoothing method is to approximate nonsmooth functions by a sequence of smooth functions. There are many forms of smooth functions. Qi and Chen proposed a smooth approximation method for nonsmooth functions in . By introducing the smoothing approximation function of , , smoothing methods are proposed by Chen et al. So far, a lot of progress has been made in the study of smoothing methods. In this paper, similar to , we use the smoothing Fischer-Burmeister function aswhere .

Therefore, (3) is equivalent to , where

Then, (3) and (4) are equivalent to the following problem:whereand . Let and define a merit function of (9) as .

If (1) has a solution, then solving (9) is equivalent to finding a global solution of the following optimization problem:where .

Next, we give some related definitions and propositions.

Definition 1. Assume that is a locally Lipschitzian function. The -subdifferential of at is where is the differentiable points set and is the Jacobian of at a point .
Here, for any , we havewhere is the -subdifferential of to , is the -subdifferential of to , and is the -subdifferential of to . is the identity matrix and .

Definition 2 (see ). is said to be semismooth at ifexist for any .

Definition 3 (see ). is said to be strongly semismooth at if is semismooth at and for any ,

Definition 4 (see ). is said to be -regular at a point if all the elements in are nonsingular.

#### 3. Projected Smoothing Newton Method and Convergence Analysis

In this section, we present the projected smoothing Newton method and establish the global and local convergence results of the given method.

Method 1 (projected smoothing Newton method).
Step  0. Choose , satisfying , .
Step  1. Compute . If , stop.
Step  2. Compute bywhere .
Step  3. Let be the least nonnegative integer satisfyingLet .
In the following, we give the convergence results of Method 1.

Theorem 5. Let be an infinite sequence generated by Method 1, and is an accumulation point of . If is a BD-regular solution of , is a solution of .

Proof. From Step  3 of Method 1, we have , for all . Hence, is monotonically decreasing. Since , there exists , such that .
We suppose . By (17), we haveTake the limit of (18) on both sides. We getThen, we have .
This is in contradiction to . Hence, . The proof is completed.

Theorem 6. Let be an infinite sequence generated by Method 1 and be a BD-regular solution; the rate of convergence is quadratic.

Proof. By Proposition (b) in  and being nonempty compact set at any point, we have that is bounded in bounded set of points. So, there is a constant and , such that, for all , where is a sufficiently small positive constant, and hold. Besides, by Definition 3, there exists a positive constant , such thatfor all , where is a sufficiently small positive constant. Moreover, there exists a positive constant , such that hold.
Denote , for all . We haveSince is a locally Lipschitzian function, we premultiply this equation by and take norms on both sides. So we getwhere . Therefore, similar to the proof of Theorem in , we know that the rate of convergence is -quadratic. The proof is completed.

#### 4. Numerical Results

In this section, we give some related numerical experiments. Because problem (1) is proposed for the first time, we give the following examples combined with the examples in literatures [17, 38]. In , the authors consider the complex shell inside the complicated enclosures of the electronic component and the high frequency radiation. The enclosure is assumed to be large compared to the wavelength. In this case, wavelengths have strong dependence on the properties of waves, including eigenvalues, eigenfunctions, scattering, and impedance matrices under small perturbations. The field fluctuations within the enclosure are described in a statistical sense using random matrix theory. In , in the microwave frequency band, the resonant circuit is usually realized by a resonant cavity. The cavity is filled with air or other mediums, and the electromagnetic oscillation in the cavity can be generated in the cavity by the way of probe and small hole. The waveguide cavity is formed by sealing the waveguides along the ends of the propagation direction with a conductor. Example 10 is converted from a two-dimensional rectangular resonant cavity problem in random system, which is proposed in [3, 38]. The program is written in Matlab 7.0. The parameters in Method 1 are taken as

The stopping rules for Method 1 are or .

The initial points are randomly selected. In these tables of the numerical results, denotes the point of the minimization of , denotes the eigenvalue, and DIM denotes the dimension of the problem.

Example 7. We consider problem (1), whereThe numerical results of Example 7 are given in Table 1 and the values of at each iteration are shown in Figure 1.

 1.5343 0.4328 1.5280 0.4193 1.5159 0.3759 1.5472 0.4327 1.4130 0.1902

Example 8. We consider problem (1), whereThe numerical results of Example 8 are shown in Table 2 and the values of at each iteration are shown in Figure 2.

 0.8996 0.5782 0.9013 0.2802 1.0000 0.3125 0.9001 0.4441 1.0000 0.7799

Example 9. We consider problem (1), whereWhen takes different values, the numerical results of Example 9 are shown in Table 3 and the values of at each iteration are shown in Figure 3.
In the following, we consider the application of problem (1) in resonant cavity.
The calculation of the resonator can be described by the field equation and the boundary condition. With passivity in the cavity, the field vector satisfies the homogeneous Helmholtz equation. The vector potential and the vector potential are used, and an arbitrary field vector is taken as a leading vector. We havewhere and satisfyOn the inner wall of the cavity, the boundary conditions can often be converted toBesides, as we all know, generally speaking, microwave engineering can be divided into two categories: eigenvalue problems and noneigenvalue problems. The problems of the propagation of electromagnetic wave in the waveguide and the distribution of the midfield in the cavity are all eigenvalue problems. In , the eigenvalue problem here is as follows:The reason for such a conclusion is that if the problem is abstracted, the Laplace operator acts on the function and the product of matrix and vector can be regarded as a linear operator acting on an object .
In , the author considers the eigenvalue problem as follows:where and are matrices, is the unknown quantity, and is the eigenvalue.
In a random system, different loop lengths can produce different resonant frequencies, resulting in multiple modes. So we denote the resonant frequencies as , where is random.
In Example 10 of this paper, we transform the above eigenvalue problem into the eigenvalue complementarity problem (1) and consider the form in the stochastic system. Next, we give Example 10.

 DIM 50 1.4000 0.7196 50 1.4000 0.7248 50 1.4000 0.6907 50 1.4000 0.6868 50 1.4000 0.6811 100 1.4000 0.9427 100 1.4000 0.8941 100 1.4000 0.8774 100 1.4000 0.8967 100 1.4000 0.8902 200 1.6595 1.7401 200 1.6610 1.6844 200 1.6626 1.5796 200 1.6584 1.8135 200 1.6611 1.7051

Example 10. We consider problem (1), whereThe numerical results of Example 10 are shown in Table 4 and the values of at each iteration are shown in Figure 4.

 1.1038 0.5255 1.1097 0.5169 1.1004 0.5172 1.1718 0.6617 1.1417 0.9004

#### 5. Conclusion

The numerical experiments show that the projected smoothing Newton method is effective in solving the eigenvalue complementarity problems, even for high dimensional problems. After several experiments, we find that the value of in smoothing function has a great influence on the numerical results. When , the numerical results are optimal. Using the smoothing Newton method, the objective function is polished. So the objective function is guided everywhere. Besides, the projected smoothing Newton method is -quadratic. In the application of the projected smoothing Newton method, we consider the two-dimension resonator problem. Therefore, using the new technology of optimization method to further improve the accuracy and efficiency of the given method, the applications in more complicated resonator problems are of great significance and practical value.

#### Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

#### Acknowledgments

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 11671220) and Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (no. ZR2016AM29).

1. A. Taflove and S. C. Hagness, Computational Electrodynamics: The Finite-Difference Timedomain Method, Artech House, 2000.
2. T. Maceina, P. Bettini, G. Manduchi, and M. Passarotto, “Fast and Efficient algorithms for computational electromagnetics on GPU architecture,” IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, vol. 64, no. 7, pp. 1983–1987, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
3. C. Q. Wang, The Basis of Modern Computational Electromagnetics, Peking University press, 2005.
4. S. M. Anlage, J. Rodgers, S. Hemmady, J. Hart, T. M. Antonsen, and E. Ott, “New results in chaotic time-reversed electromagnetics: high frequency one-recording-channel time-reversal mirror,” Acta Physica Polonica A, vol. 112, no. 4, pp. 569–574, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
5. X. Gao, C. Sui, S. Hemmady et al., “Predicting EMI induced delay errors in integrated circuits: sensitivity to the velocity saturation index,” Electromagnetic Compatibility, pp. 102–105, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
6. S. Clénet, “Uncertainty quantification in computational electromagnetics: the stochastic approach,” International Compumag Society Newsletters, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
7. Y. Tawk, M. Al-Husseini, S. Hemmady, and A. R. Albrecht, “Statistical prediction and measurement of induced voltages on components within complicated enclosures: a wave-chaotic approach,” in International Conference on Electromagnetics in Advanced Applications, vol. 17, pp. 294–297, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
8. J. J. Júdice, H. D. Sherali, and I. M. Ribeiro, “The eigenvalue complementarity problem,” Computational optimization and applications, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 139–156, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
9. J. Júdice, M. Raydan, S. S. Rosa, and S. A. Santos, “On the solution of the symmetric eigenvalue complementarity problem by the spectral projected gradient algorithm,” Numerical Algorithms, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 391–407, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
10. L. S. Fernandes, J. J. Júdice, M. Fukushima, and A. Iusem, “On the symmetric quadratic eigenvalue complementarity problem,” Optimization Methods & Software, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 751–770, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
11. H. A. Le Thi, M. Moeini, T. Pham Dinh, and J. Judice, “A DC programming approach for solving the symmetric eigenvalue complementarity problem,” Computational Optimization and Applications, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 1097–1117, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
12. Y.-Y. Chen and Y. Gao, “Levenberg-marquardt method for the eigenvalue complementarity problem,” The Scientific World Journal, vol. 2014, Article ID 307823, 6 pages, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
13. J. J. Júdice, H. D. Sherali, I. . Ribeiro, and S. S. Rosa, “On the asymmetric eigenvalue complementarity problem,” Optimization Methods & Software, vol. 24, no. 4-5, pp. 549–568, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
14. A. Pinto da Costa, J. A. Martins, I. N. Figueiredo, and J. J. Júdice, “The directional instability problem in systems with frictional contacts,” Computer Methods Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 193, no. 3-5, pp. 357–384, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
15. X. Chen and M. Fukushima, “Expected residual minimization method for stochastic linear complementarity problems,” Mathematics of Operations Research, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 1022–1038, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
16. G. L. Zhou and L. Caccetta, “Feasible semismooth Newton method for a class of stochastic linear complementarity problems,” Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, vol. 139, no. 2, pp. 379–392, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
17. X. Chen, C. Zhang, and M. Fukushima, “Robust solution of monotone stochastic linear complementarity problems,” Mathematical Programming, vol. 117, no. 1-2, pp. 51–80, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
18. C. Ling, L. Qi, G. Zhou, and L. Caccetta, “The property of an expected residual function arising from stochastic complementarity problems,” Operations Research Letters, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 456–460, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
19. Y. W. Huang and G. H. Lin, “Some results on solving a class of stochastic mathematical programs with complementarity constraints,” Operations Research and Fuzziology, vol. 02, no. 03, pp. 35–41, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
20. Z. Liu, S. Du, and R. Wang, “A new conjugate gradient projection method for solving stochastic generalized linear complementarity problems,” Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics, vol. 04, no. 06, pp. 1024–1031, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
21. H. Fang, X. Chen, and M. Fukushima, “Stochastic matrix linear complementarity problems,” SIAM Journal on Optimization, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 482–506, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
22. G.-H. Lin and M. Fukushima, “Stochastic equilibrium problems and stochastic mathematical programs with equilibrium constraints: a survey,” Pacific Journal of Optimization. An International Journal, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 455–482, 2010. View at: Google Scholar | MathSciNet
23. K. Hamatani and M. Fukushima, “Pricing american options with uncertain volatility through stochastic linear complementarity models,” Computational Optimization and Applications, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 263–286, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
24. B. Chen and P. T. Harker, “Smooth approximations to nonlinear complementarity problems,” SIAM Journal on Optimization, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 403–420, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
25. C. H. Chen and O. L. Mangasarian, “Smoothing methods for convex inequalities and linear complementarity problems,” Mathematical Programming, vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 51–69, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
26. C. Chen and O. L. Mangasarian, “A class of smoothing functions for nonlinear and mixed complementarity problems,” Computational Optimization and Applications, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 97–138, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
27. B. Chen, X. Chen, and C. Kanzow, “A penalized Fischer-Burmeister NCP-function,” Mathematical Programming, vol. 88, pp. 211–216, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
28. J. Y. Han, N. H. Xiu, and H. D. Qi, Nonlinear Complementary Theory and Algorithm, Shanghai Scientific and Technical Publishers, Shanghai, China, 2006.
29. Y. K. Huang, The Research of the Algorithms of the Stochastic Linear Complementarity Problems, Xidian University, Xi'an, China, 2010.
30. C. Kanzow and H. Pieper, “Jacobian smoothing methods for nonlinear complementarity problems,” SIAM Journal on Optimization, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 342–373, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
31. L. Qi, D. Sun, and G. Zhou, “A new look at smoothing Newton methods for nonlinear complementarity problems and box constrained variational inequalities,” Mathematical Programming, vol. 87, no. 1, pp. 1–35, 2000. View at: Google Scholar | MathSciNet
32. X. Chen, L. Qi, and D. Sun, “Global and superlinear convergence of the smoothing Newton method and its application to general box constrained variational inequalities,” Mathematics of Computation, vol. 67, no. 222, pp. 519–540, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
33. X. Chen, “Smoothing methods for nonsmooth, nonconvex minimization,” Mathematical Programming, vol. 134, no. 1, pp. 71–99, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
34. L. Q. Qi and X. J. Chen, “A globally convergent successive approximation method for severely nonsmooth equations,” SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 402–418, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
35. L. Q. Qi, “Convergence analysis of some algorithms for solving nonsmooth equations,” Mathematics of Operations Research, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 227–244, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
36. F. H. Clarke, Optimization and Nonsmooth Analysis, John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1983. View at: MathSciNet
37. C. Kanzow and S. Petra, “Projected filter trust region methods for a semismooth least squares formulation of mixed complementarity problems,” Optimization Methods & Software, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 713–735, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
38. F. Xing, Numerical Calculation and Simulation Analysis of Electromagnetic Field, National Defense Industry Press, 2014.

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at help@hindawi.com to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions. 