Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2018, Article ID 7823930, 11 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/7823930
Research Article

Parameter Identification of an Activated Sludge Wastewater Treatment Process Based on Particle Swarm Optimization Method

Industrial Systems Study and Renewable Energy Unit, National Engineering School of Monastir, University of Monastir, Ibn El Jazzar Street, Skanes, 5019 Monastir, Tunisia

Correspondence should be addressed to Intissar Khoja; moc.liamg@ajohkrassitni

Received 13 August 2017; Accepted 24 December 2017; Published 21 January 2018

Academic Editor: Roberto Baratti

Copyright © 2018 Intissar Khoja et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. F. Nejjari, G. Roux, B. Dahhou, and A. Benhammou, “Estimation and optimal control design of a biological wastewater treatment process,” Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 269–280, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  2. M. Henze, C. P. L. Grady Jr., W. Gujer, G. V. R. Marais, and T. Matsuo, “Activated sludge model no. 1,” International Association on water pollution Research and Control, Scientific and Technical Reports No. 1, 1987. View at Google Scholar
  3. S. Caraman, M. Barbu, and G. Dumitrascu, “Wastewater treatment process identification based on the calculus of state variables sensibilities with respect to the process coefficients,” in Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE International Conference on Automation, Quality and Testing, Robotics, pp. 199–204, IEEE, Cluj-Napoca, Romania, May 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. W. Gujer, M. Henze, T. Mino, T. Matsuo, M. C. Wentzel, and G. V. R. Marais, “The activated sludge model No. 2: Biological phosphorus removal,” Water Science and Technology, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 1–11, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. M. Henze, W. Gujer, T. Mino et al., “Activated sludge model No. 2D, ASM2D,” Water Science and Technology, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 165–182, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. W. Gujer, M. Henze, T. Mino, and M. Van Loosdrecht, “Activated Sludge Model No. 3,” Water Science and Technology, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 183–193, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. K. V. Gernaey, M. C. M. Van Loosdrecht, M. Henze, M. Lind, and S. B. Jørgensen, “Activated sludge wastewater treatment plant modelling and simulation: State of the art,” Environmental Modeling and Software, vol. 19, no. 9, pp. 763–783, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. S. Caraman, M. Barbu, and E. Arinton, “The linearizing control of a wastewater treatment process with the removal of two substrates,” Annals of the University of Craiova, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 35–40, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  9. S. Julien, Modelisation et Estimation Pour le Controle D'un Procédé Boues Activées Eliminan L'azote des Eaux Residuaires Urbaines, Department of Analysis and Systems Architecture of CNRS, Toulouse university, Toulouse, France, 1997.
  10. C. Gomez-Quintero, Modélisation et Estimation Robuste Pour un Procédé Boues Activées en Alternance de Phases, Department of Analysis and Systems Architecture of CNRS, Toulouse University, Toulouse, France, 2002.
  11. U. Jeppsson, On the Verifiability of the Activated Sludge System Dynamics [Ph.D. thesis], 1993.
  12. H. Zhao, S. H. Isaacs, H. Søeberg, and M. Kümmel, “An analysis of nitrogen removal and control strategies in an alternating activated sludge process,” Water Research, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 535–544, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. R. Brun, M. Kühni, H. Siegrist, W. Gujer, and P. Reichert, “Practical identifiability of ASM2d parameters - Systematic selection and tuning of parameter subsets,” Water Research, vol. 36, no. 16, pp. 4113–4127, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. G. Sin, S. W. H. Van Hulle, D. J. W. De Pauw, A. Van Griensven, and P. A. Vanrolleghem, “A critical comparison of systematic calibration protocols for activated sludge models: A SWOT analysis,” Water Research, vol. 39, no. 12, pp. 2459–2474, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. H. Hauduc, L. Rieger, I. Takács, A. Héduit, P. A. Vanrolleghem, and S. Gillot, “A systematic approach for model verification: Application on seven published activated sludge models,” Water Science and Technology, vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 825–839, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. M. Ekman, “Bilinear black-box identification and MPC of the activated sludge process,” Journal of Process Control, vol. 18, no. 7-8, pp. 643–653, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. O. A. Z. Sotomayor, S. W. Park, and C. Garcia, “Multivariable identification of an activated sludge process with subspace-based algorithms,” Control Engineering Practice, vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 961–969, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. S. Caraman and M. Barbu, “The identification and robust control of a biological wastewater treatment process,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Automation, Quality and Testing, Robotics, (AQTR '08), pp. 37–42, IEEE, Cluj-Napoca, Romania, May 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. S. Grieu, F. Thiery, A. Traoré, T. P. Nguyen, M. Barreau, and M. Polit, “KSOM and MLP neural networks for on-line estimating the efficiency of an activated sludge process,” Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 116, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. M. Côté, B. P. A. Grandjean, P. Lessard, and J. Thibault, “Dynamic modelling of the activated sludge process: Improving prediction using neural networks,” Water Research, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 995–1004, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. A. Sorsa, R. Peltokangas, and K. Leiviskä, “Parameter identification in the activated sludge process,” in Proceedings of the 2008 4th International IEEE Conference "Intelligent Systems" (IS), vol. 17, Varna, Bulgaria, September 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. D. Sendrescu, “Parameter identification of anaerobic wastewater treatment bioprocesses using particle swarm optimization,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2013, Article ID 103748, 8 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. V. Abedifar, M. Eshghi, S. Mirjalili, and S. M. Mirjalili, “An optimized virtual network mapping using PSO in cloud computing,” in Proceedings of the 21st Iranian Conference on Electrical Engineering, (ICEE '13), IEEE, Mashhad, Iran, May 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. M. Bechouat, Y. Soufi, M. Sedraoui, and S. Kahla, “Energy storage based on maximum power point tracking in photovoltaic systems: a comparison between GAs and PSO approaches,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 40, no. 39, pp. 13737–13748, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. H. Akbar, N. Suryana, and S. Sahib, “Controlling B-spline snake behavior using particle swarm optimisation,” International Journal Bioautomation, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 179–186, 2012. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. F. Hamdaoui, A. Sakly, and A. Mtibaa, “Hardware implementation of PSO-architecture for image segmentation on FPGA,” Asian Journal of Applied Sciences, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. N. Kherici and Y. Mohamed Ben Ali, “Using PSO for a walk of a biped robot,” Journal of Computational Science, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 743–749, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. Q. Jin, B. Jiang, and Z. Cheng, “A novel identification method based on frequency response analysis,” Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 44–54, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. M. El-Kafafy, A. Elsawaf, B. Peeters, T. Vampola, and P. Guillaume, “Model parameters identification using particles swarm optimisation,” International Journal of Systems Applications, vol. 9, pp. 103–109, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  30. M. Fontan, A. Ndiaye, D. Breysse, F. Bos, and C. Fernandez, “Soil-structure interaction: parameters identification using particle swarm optimization,” Computers & Structures, vol. 89, no. 17-18, pp. 1602–1614, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. T. Messai, A. Chammam, and A. Sellami, “Conductivity polynomial model parameters identification based on particle swarm optimization,” Control Engineering and Applied Informatics, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 58–65, 2013. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. J. Yao, H. Yu, M. Dietz et al., “Acceleration harmonic estimation for a hydraulic shaking table by using particle swarm optimization,” Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 738–747, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  33. J. Kennedy and R. Eberhart, “Particle swarm optimization,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks (ICNN ’95), vol. 4, pp. 1942–1948, Perth, Western Australia, November-December 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. M. J. M. Janssen, L. N. Hopkins, B. Petersen, and P. A. Vanrolleghem, “Reduction of an activated sludge process model to facilitate controller tuning,” in Proceedings of the 14th European Simulation Multiconference, pp. 697–701, Ghent, Belgium, May 2000.
  35. U. Jeppsson, “A simplified control-oriented model of the activated sludge process,” Mathematical Modelling of Systems, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 3–16, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  36. C. Gómez-Quintero, I. Queinnec, and J. Babary, “A reduced nonlinear model of an activated sludge process,” IFAC Proceedings Volumes, vol. 33, no. 10, pp. 1001–1006, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  37. J. S. Anderson, H. Kim, T. J. McAvoy, and O. J. Hao, “Control of an alternating aerobic-anoxic activated sludge system - Part 1: Development of a linearization-based modeling approach,” Control Engineering Practice, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 271–278, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. I. Y. Smets, J. V. Haegebaert, R. Carrette, and J. F. Van Impe, “Linearization of the activated sludge model ASM1 for fast and reliable predictions,” Water Research, vol. 37, no. 8, pp. 1831–1851, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. J. A. Nelder and R. Mead, “A simplex method for function minimization,” The Computer Journal, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 308–313, 1965. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  40. S.-K. S. Fan, Y.-C. Liang, and E. Zahara, “A genetic algorithm and a particle swarm optimizer hybridized with Nelder-Mead simplex search,” Computers & Industrial Engineering, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 401–425, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. E. Zahara and Y.-T. Kao, “Hybrid Nelder-Mead simplex search and particle swarm optimization for constrained engineering design problems,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 3880–3886, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. T. Ladhari, Conception des Obsevateurs Robustes À Entrées Inconnues [Master, Thesis], 2004.