Analyzing the Coupling Coordination among Economic, Social, and Environmental Benefits of Urban Infrastructure: Case Study of Four Chinese Autonomous Municipalities

Table 3

Weights of urban infrastructure benefit indicators of four cities (2004-2015).

Indicator	Beijing	Tianjin	Shanghai	Chongqing
Consumption effect (U11)	0.0935	0.0778	0.0887	0.0766
Investment effect (U12)	0.0908	0.0841	0.0909	0.0954
Government purchase effect (U13)	0.0981	0.0850	0.0842	0.0908
External demand effect (U14)	0.1200	0.1216	0.0764	0.1892
Income effect (U21)	0.1006	0.1456	0.1315	0.1674
Resident health effect (U22)	0.0758	0.1711	0.1847	0.0462
Development potential effect (U23)	0.1937	0.2043	0.1792	0.1898
Treating waste effect (U31)	0.0531	0.0344	0.0771	0.0389
Purifying air effect (U32)	0.1430	0.0425	0.0300	0.0692
Regulating climate effect (U33)	0.0315	0.0335	0.0573	0.0365