Research Article  Open Access
Liming Xing, Haifei Liu, Yu Ding, Wei Huang, "Numerical Modeling of WaveCurrent Flow around Cylinders Using an Enhanced Equilibrium BhatnagarGrossKrook Scheme", Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2018, Article ID 8516879, 9 pages, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8516879
Numerical Modeling of WaveCurrent Flow around Cylinders Using an Enhanced Equilibrium BhatnagarGrossKrook Scheme
Abstract
Flow around cylinders is a classic issue of fluid mechanics and it has great significance in engineering fields. In this study, a twodimensional hydrodynamic lattice Boltzmann numerical model is proposed, coupling wave radiation stress, bed shear stress, and wind shear stress, which is able to simulate wave propagation of flow around cylinders. It is based on shallow water equations and a weight factor is applied for the force term. An enhanced equilibrium BhatnagarGrossKrook (BGK) scheme is developed to treat the wave radiation stress term in collision step. This model is tested and verified by two cases: the first case is the flow around a single circular cylinder, where the flow is driven by current, wave, or both wave and current, respectively, and the second case is the solitary waves moving around cylinders. The results illustrate the correctness of this model, which could be used to analyze the detailed flow pattern around a cylinder.
1. Introduction
The phenomena of flow around cylinders, which represent blunt bodies, widely exist in aviation, mechanical, and environmental engineering. In recent years, an increasing number of problems about complex flow around cylinders have been raised with the development of coastal engineering projects. Therefore, this topic attracts much attention among researchers.
Flow around cylinders is a classic and complicated problem. The cross section is contracted, the velocity increases, and the pressure decreases along the path when the flow encounters cylinders. The separation of the boundary layer is formed around cylinders due to the viscous force, which is called the flow around cylinders. Additionally, cylinders are nonstreamline objects, which influence the characteristics of flow around cylinders by many factors, such as the Reynolds number, the surface roughness, the turbulence intensity, and the cylinder size. All these lead to the complexity of flow around cylinders. The wave is one of the most common movement forms in water, and it is worth studying wave motion in shipping, coastal, and ocean engineering. Therefore, the research of wave propagation around cylinders is complicated, but significant.
With the development of the fluid mechanics theory and the continuous updating of computer equipment, computational fluid dynamics has been greatly developed and numerical simulation became an important tool in research. Saiki and Biringen [1] introduced a virtual boundary technique to simulate uniform flows around cylinders, and the oscillations caused by this method can be attenuated by highorder finite differences. Based on this, Lima E Silva et al. [2] proposed the physical virtual model in which this immersed boundary was represented with a finite number of Lagrangian points, distributed over the solidfluid interface. Ofengeim and Drikakis [3] presented numerical research on the interaction of plane blast waves and a cylinder, revealing that the blastwave duration significantly influenced the unsteady flow around the cylinder. Breuer [4] computed the turbulent flow around a cylinder (Re = 3900) via large eddy simulation. Meneghini et al. [5] used a fractional step method to simulate laminar flows between two cylinders. Hu et al. [6] built a fully nonlinear potential model based on a finite element method to investigate the wave motion around a moving cylinder, and it provided certain important features that were absent in the linear theory. Wu and Shu [7] proposed a local domainfree discretization method that is able to simulate flow around an oscillating cylinder easier due to its advantage of handling the boundary. Claus and Phillips [8] used spectral/hp element methods to study the flow around a confined cylinder. The nonconforming spectral element method and adaptive meshes method were tested by Hsu et al. [9], demonstrating its feasibility on curve surfaces of cylinder.
The lattice Boltzmann method (LBM) is a promising numerical simulation method of recent decades. Compared to traditional methods, LBM has many advantages: the algorithm is simple; it can deal with complicated boundary conditions; and it is suitable for parallel processing. These superiorities lead to wide usage of LBM in many research fields. Ginzburg and D’Humieres [10] introduced a new kind of boundary conditions, improving the accuracy close to the quasianalytical reference solution. JiménezHornero et al. [11] used LBM to simulate the turbulent flow structure in an open channel with the influence of vegetation. Liu et al. [12] established a twodimensional multiblock lattice Boltzmann model for solute transport in shallow water flows. Based on the ChapmanEnskog process, Liu and Zhou [13] proposed a lattice Boltzmann model to simulate the wettingdrying front in shallow flows.
At the same time, many scholars have investigated the flow around cylinders based on the LBM. However, most studies are related to the heat transfer around cylinders. Yan and Zu [14] presented a numerical strategy to handle curved and moving boundaries for simulating viscous fluid around a rotating isothermal cylinder with heat transfer. Rabienataj Darzi et al. [15] used the LBM to analyze mixed convection flow and heat transfer between two hot cylinders. However, up to now, there is no LBM model for wavecurrent flow around cylinders.
In this study, considering wavecurrent interaction, a twodimensional hydrodynamic numerical model is developed based on the LBM. The model couples three types of stresses, including wave radiation stress, wind shear stress, and bed shear stress. Meanwhile, an enhanced local equilibrium function is developed to treat the wave radiation stress. It is used to simulate the propagation of waves in the flow around cylinders, and then two classic examples are used for validation, which can provide characteristics of flow around cylinders.
2. Methodology
2.1. Governing Equations
The twodimensional shallow water equations including the continuity equation and momentum equation can be written in a tensor form as where the subscripts and represent the space direction indices and the Einstein summation convention is used; represents the Cartesian coordinate, taking , , and in turn; represents the velocity component which takes and corresponding to that in and and directions, respectively. represents the water depth; represents the time; represents the kinematic viscosity; represents the bed height of the datum plane and represents the force term and defined aswhere represents the wind shear stress and represents the bed shear stress.
Wave Radiation Stress . LonguetHiggins and Stewart [16] defined the difference between the timeaverage momentum value and the static water pressure on the water column per unit area, known as the wave radiation stress.
In (3), the wave radiation stresses , , , and are determined via local wave parameters. The wave radiation stress along the direction of wave propagation is , and the lateral one is , where , is wave velocity, represents the group velocity, and represents the wave height. The conversion is conducted in the Cartesian coordinate system [17]:where represents the angle between the wave direction and the axis.
Bed Shear Stress . Bed shear stress is generated by the wavecurrent interaction in the direction, calculated as follows [18]:in which represents the bed friction coefficient, which may be either constant or calculated from , where represents the Chezy coefficient given based on the Manning coefficient , represents the wave bottom frictional velocity; represents the wavecurrent influence factor, which is equal to 0.917 for the waves and currents are in the same direction, −0.1983 for perpendicular relation and 0.359 for other angles [19]; and represents the wave friction factor, which is from 0.006 to 0.001 in practice [20].
Wind Shear Stress . Wind shear stress () is usually expressed aswhere is the density of air; is the resistance coefficient; and is the component of the wind velocity in direction.
2.2. Lattice Boltzmann Method
On account of the lattice Boltzmann method with a D2Q9 lattice, an enhanced equilibrium BGK Scheme is developed in this paper. The wave radiation stress is treated in local equilibrium function at collision step.
The discrete evolution process in the LBM with the enhanced force term [12, 21] can be written aswhere the external force term can be written aswhere represents the weight factor: for ; for ; for . represents the distribution function of particles; represents the local equilibrium distribution function; represents the time step; represents the single relaxation time; and represents the velocity vector of a particle in the link.
For the D2Q9 lattice shown in Figure 1, each particle moves one lattice at its direction. The velocity of each particle is defined by where and is the lattice size.
An equilibrium distribution function can be expressed asTherefore, the equilibrium distribution function can be written as where there must bedue to symmetry.
Moreover, the local equilibrium distribution function must satisfy the following three conditions:Hence, the relations among , , and areWe can obtainTherefore, the enhanced equilibrium distribution function is
2.3. Recovery of WaveCurrent Coupling Equations
The recover deductions are following the ChapmanEnskog procedure.
Based on (7), assuming is small, taking Taylor expansion in time and space around point leads toFrom ChapmanEnskog expansion, we haveSubstitution of (17) and (18) into (7), one can obtainTo order , it isTo order , it isSubstitution of (20) into (21), we haveTaking about providesTaking about providesAccording to the law of conservation of mass, we know If the centerscheme for the force term is applied, evaluation of the other terms in the above equations using (13) and (25) simplifies (23) and (24) and obtains withSubstitution of (27) into (26) leads to the following equations which were referred to as wavecurrent coupling equations (1).
3. Numerical Tests
3.1. WaveCurrent Flow around a Circular Cylinder
This model is built based on the verified LBM hydrodynamic model [22]. The layout diagram of the channel is shown in Figure 2. The length is 7 m, and the width is 2 m. The bottom is flat and a solid cylinder with a 0.12 m radius is located at 2 m, 1 m. The initial water depth is 1 m and the flows go from the left to the right. The computational domain is divided by computational grids. The time step is 0.01 s.
This case includes three different tests, which are driven by currents, by waves, and by both wave and current, respectively. The flow variables and wave parameters of three types situations are shown in Table 1 ( is initial horizontal velocity and is initial vertical velocity).

Test 1 (driven by the current). It can be seen that the water depth and flow velocity obviously varied due to the presence of the middle column (see Figure 3).
(a) The magnitude of
(b) The magnitude of
When the flow encounters the cylinder, it passes around and a weak area emerges just behind the cylinder, where the circulation and a drop of water surface can be found.
Test 2 (driven by the wave). The initial water is still and a wave maker is set at the inlet, where the incident waves are parallel generated in the axis. The water depth is intuitively depicted in Figure 4, where one can find regular wave propagation although there is a deformation caused by the cylinder.
In terms of the longitudinal velocity , it is not always positive, as the flow is only driven by the wave (see Figures 4 and 5). This phenomenon is further described in Figure 6.
(a)
(b)
Test 3 (driven by both wave and current). Under the interaction effects of waves and currents, the wave runup is pushed higher than before (see Figures 7 and 8), and the deformation process is more apparent (see Figure 9).
(a)
(b)
To illustrate the effects of currents and waves, the comparisons of the velocity and the water depth are plotted in Figures 10 and 11, respectively. It can be found that the wavecurrent interaction is not a simple superposition of waves and currents, and furthermore, wavecurrent interaction effects are greater than summation of these two effects separately.
3.2. Solitary Waves around Cylinders
This case is a classic cylinder model that has been simulated by many researchers before [23, 24]. In this section, a solitary wave around a cylinder is simulated first. The whole water channel is 60 m long and 30 m wide, and there is a circular cylinder with in the center of the channel. The initial solitary wave with amplitude of 0.4 m is incident from left. Lattice size is 0.4 m, and the time step is 0.01 s.
Figure 12 shows the plots of threedimensional perspective view of water surface at = 8.7 s and 16 s. The solitary wave climbs up and a sequence of significant disperse waves after initial wave encountering the cylinder can be observed. At , the solitary wave is about to propagate out of the area. At the same time, disperse waves are fully developed to cover almost all the channel behind the frontal wave. The results are consistent with previous research [23].
(a) = 8.7 s
(b) = 16 s
Furthermore, a solitary wave around four cylinders is simulated. The simulation is conducted in an area of constant water depth (1 m), being 60 m long and 40 m wide. The distance between the centers of any two adjacent cylinders is 7.17 m, and the radius of four cylinders is the same with 2 m (see Figure 13). The whole domain is divided by computational grids. The time step is 0.01 s.
Figure 14 is the threedimensional water depth of the wave around four cylinders at different times. The climbing up of water on the first cylinder can be observed at = 7 s. At = 9 s, the solitary wave encounters two middle cylinders and then runs up the front sides. Furthermore, a circular back disperse wave begins to turn up and propagates along the channel. The height of the middle part of the solitary wave decreases significantly due to obstruction of the frontal cylinder. The solitary wave encounters the rear cylinder at = 10.5 s. The results show that the back disperse waves induced by the frontal cylinder form a circular wave pattern propagating towards the left open boundary. At the same time, the circular disperse waves, emerging from the two middle cylinders, are also expanded. Due to the complicated interactions between waves and cylinders, the diffracted wave patterns become fully irregular in the domain at = 16 s. The results of the proposed model agree well with the work conducted by Zhong and Wang [23].
(a) = 7 s
(b) = 9 s
(c) = 10.5 s
(d) = 16 s
4. Conclusion
This paper proposes a twodimensional hydrodynamic model to investigate the wavecurrent interaction around cylinders. The lattice Boltzmann method was used to discretize the mathematical model in numerical simulation. A BKG scheme with an enhanced equilibrium is used to treat the wave radiation stress. The numerical results of both cases are in good agreement with practicalities and previous studies, demonstrating that this new model is able to produce reliable results for studying cylinders problems.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51379001) and the Open Fund of State Key Laboratory of Hydraulics and Mountain River Engineering (SKHL1518).
References
 E. M. Saiki and S. Biringen, “Numerical simulation of a cylinder in uniform flow: Application of a virtual boundary method,” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 123, no. 2, pp. 450–465, 1996. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. L. F. Lima E Silva, A. SilveiraNeto, and J. J. R. Damasceno, “Numerical simulation of twodimensional flows over a circular cylinder using the immersed boundary method,” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 189, no. 2, pp. 351–370, 2003. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 D. K. Ofengeim and D. Drikakis, “Simulation of blast wave propagation over a cylinder,” Shock Waves, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 305–317, 1997. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. Breuer, “Large eddy simulation of the subcritical flow past a circular cylinder: Numerical and modeling aspects,” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, vol. 28, no. 9, pp. 1281–1302, 1998. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. R. Meneghini, F. Saltara, C. L. R. Siqueira, and J. A. Ferrari Jr., “Numerical simulation of flow interference between two circular cylinders in tandem and sidebyside arrangements,” Journal of Fluids and Structures, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 327–350, 2001. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 P. Hu, G. X. Wu, and Q. W. Ma, “Numerical simulation of nonlinear wave radiation by a moving vertical cylinder,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 29, no. 14, pp. 1733–1750, 2002. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y. L. Wu and C. Shu, “Application of local {DFD} method to simulate unsteady flows around an oscillating circular cylinder,” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, vol. 58, no. 11, pp. 1223–1236, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  MathSciNet
 S. Claus and T. N. Phillips, “Viscoelastic flow around a confined cylinder using spectral/hp element methods,” Journal of NonNewtonian Fluid Mechanics, vol. 200, pp. 131–146, 2013. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 L.C. Hsu, J.Z. Ye, and C.H. Hsu, “Simulation of Flow Past a Cylinder with Adaptive Spectral Element Method,” Journal of Mechanics, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 235–247, 2017. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 I. Ginzburg and D. D’Humieres, “Multireflection boundary conditions for lattice Boltzmann models,” Physical Review E: Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, vol. 68, no. 6, Article ID 066614, 2003. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  MathSciNet
 F. J. JiménezHornero, J. V. Giráldez, A. M. Laguna, S. J. Bennett, and C. V. Alonso, “Modelling the effects of emergent vegetation on an openchannel flow using a lattice model,” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, vol. 55, no. 7, pp. 655–672, 2007. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 H. Liu, J. G. Zhou, M. Li, and Y. Zhao, “Multiblock lattice Boltzmann simulations of solute transport in shallow water flows,” Advances in Water Resources, vol. 58, pp. 24–40, 2013. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 H. Liu and J. G. Zhou, “Lattice Boltzmann approach to simulating a wettingdrying front in shallow flows,” Journal of Fluid Mechanics, vol. 743, pp. 32–59, 2014. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  MathSciNet
 Y. Y. Yan and Y. Q. Zu, “Numerical simulation of heat transfer and fluid flow past a rotating isothermal cylinder  A LBM approach,” International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, vol. 51, no. 910, pp. 2519–2536, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. Rabienataj Darzi, A. H. Eisapour, A. Abazarian, F. Hosseinnejad, and H. H. Afrouzi, “Mixed Convection Heat Transfer Analysis in an Enclosure with Two Hot Cylinders: A Lattice Boltzmann Approach,” Heat Transfer  Asian Research, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 218–236, 2017. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. S. LonguetHiggins and R. W. Stewart, “Radiation stresses in water waves; a physical discussion, with applications,” DeepSea Research and Oceanographic Abstracts, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 529–562, 1964. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 B.C. LIANG, H.J. LI, and D.Y. LEE, “Bottom Shear Stress Under WaveCurrent Interaction,” Journal of Hydrodynamics, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 88–95, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 F. Yang, Y. Li, L. Yang, and W. Du, “Modeling study of thermal discharge under comment influence of wave and current,” Pearl River, vol. 6, pp. 60–63, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
 Y. Lu, L. Zuo, H. Wang, and H. Li, “Twodimensional mathematical model for sediment transport by waves and tidal currents,” Journal of Sediment Research, vol. 6, pp. 1–12. View at: Google Scholar
 J. P. Le Roux, “Wave friction factor as related to the shields parameter for steady currents,” Sedimentary Geology, vol. 155, no. 12, pp. 37–43, 2003. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. G. Zhou and H. Liu, “Determination of bed elevation in the enhanced lattice Boltzmann method for the shallowwater equations,” Physical Review E: Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, vol. 88, no. 2, Article ID 023302, 2013. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. G. Zhou, Lattice Boltzmann Methods for Shallow Water Flows, Springer, Heidelberg, Germany, 2004. View at: Publisher Site
 Z. Zhong and K. H. Wang, “Modeling fully nonlinear shallowwater waves and their interactions with cylindrical structures,” Computers & Fluids, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 1018–1025, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. Woo and L. Liu, “Finite element model for modified Boussinesq equations i: model development,” Journal of Waterway Port Coastal and Ocean Engineering, vol. 130, pp. 1–16. View at: Google Scholar
Copyright
Copyright © 2018 Liming Xing et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.