Research Article
Research on the Hybrid ANP-FCE Approach of Urban Community Sustainable Construction Problem
Table 6
The weight of each indicator.
| Factor | Factor weight | Indicator | Indicator weight | No. |
| C1: Economic potential | 0.370 | C11: Housing price | 0.125 | 1 | C12: Regional advantage | 0.047 | 11 | C13: Employment opportunity | 0.039 | 13 | C14: Economic vitality | 0.070 | 6 | C15: Governance mode | 0.089 | 2 |
| C2: Environmental construction | 0.298 | C21: Natural environment | 0.089 | 3 | C22: Living conditions | 0.058 | 8 | C23: Public traffic | 0.077 | 4 | C24: Resource consumption | 0.047 | 12 | C25: Solid waste management | 0.023 | 16 |
| C3: Social development | 0.117 | C31: Culture life | 0.004 | 20 | C32: Supporting facility | 0.027 | 14 | C33: Supporting service | 0.014 | 17 | C34: Informatization degree | 0.008 | 19 | C35: Community security | 0.060 | 7 | C36: Community participation | 0.004 | 21 |
| C4: Building performance | 0.220 | C41: Building structural | 0.010 | 18 | C42: Building function | 0.057 | 9 | C43: Building quality | 0.054 | 10 | C44: Floor area ratio | 0.026 | 15 | C45: Building density | 0.074 | 5 |
|
|