Rolling Supply Chain Scheduling considering Suppliers, Production, and Delivery Lot-Size

Table 12

Effectiveness test result (Type III).

	Approach
	DS		FS		ED		PI
Type of cost structure	Average; (PIP)	CPU; time(s)	Average; (PIP)	CPU; time(s)	Average; (PIP)	CPU; time(s)
A	1,554,943.30	0.788	1,463,743.40	0.738	1,487,941.70	0.528	1,438,940
	I(91.94%)		(98.28%)		(96.59%)
B	1,704,882.57	0.698	1,586,791.13	0.667	1,617,143.61	0.533	1,526,010
	(88.28%)		(96.02%)		(94.03%)
C	1,758,044.03	0.912	1,463,743.40	0.713	1,634,839.24	0.633	1,438,940
	(77.82%)		(98.28%)		(86.39%)
D	1,678,312.20	0.615	1,586,817.11	0.773	1,487,941.70	0.545	1,438,940
	(83.36%)		(89.72%)		(96.59%)
E	1,876,511.58	0.789	1,586,791.80	0.498	1,753,161.26	0.367	1,537,260
	(77.93%)		(96.78%)		(85.96%)
F	1,767,686.67	0.699	1,581,065.00	0.598	1,634,835.93	0.447	1,541,090
	(85.30%)		(97.41%)		(93.92%)
G	1,796,983.10	0.812	1,586,814.87	0.598	1,487,941.17	0.678	1,461,880
	(77.08%)		(91.45%)		(98.22%)
H	2,631,940.00	0.713	2,655,440.00	0.667	2,725,941.09	0.547	2,582,940
	(98.10%)		(97.19%)		(94.46%)
I	2,786,344.90	0.567	2,766,240.10	0.671	2,861,142.58	0.468	2,598,650
	(92.78%)		(93.55%)		(89.90%)
J	2,840,892.77	0.776	2,655,442.24	0.478	2,837,081.77	0.456	2,582,940
	(90.01%)		(97.19%)		(90.16%)
K	2,715,081.59	0.798	2,778,683.15	0.699	2,725,943.33	0.513	2,656,800
	(97.81%)		(95.41%)		(97.40%)