Research Article
Practical Identifiability Analysis and Optimal Experimental Design for the Parameter Estimation of the ASM2d-Based EBPR Anaerobic Submodel
Table 1
Comparison of the parameter estimates results.
| | Parameters (unit) | Nonoptimal experiment | Optimal experiment | | Parameter value ± confidence intervals | Error (percentage of parameter values) | Parameter value ± confidence intervals | Error (percentage of parameter values) |
| | (mg ()/mg (COD)) | 0.36 ± 0.01 | 3.88% | 0.35 ± 0.02 | 4.86% | | (mg (COD)/L) | 3.27 ± 1.29 | 39.34% | 3.88 ± 0.41 | 10.67% | | (mg ()/()) | 3.41 ± 0.22 | 6.44% | 3.35 ± 0.27 | 8.15% | | (mg (COD)/L) | 1560 ± 80 | 5.15% | 1500 ± 72 | 4.79% |
|
|
