Research Article
Finding Optimal Load Dispatch Solutions by Using a Proposed Cuckoo Search Algorithm
Table 9
Result comparisons for Subcases 4.1 and 4.2.
| Subcase | Approach | Best cost ($/h) | Mean cost ($/h) | Worst cost ($/h) | Std. dev. ($/h) | CPU time (s) | Computer (Processor-Ram) |
| 4.1 | GA [9] | - | 131992.310 | - | - | 563.81 | 0.7 Ghz | IGA-MU [9] | - | 130180.030 | - | - | 162.58 | 0.7 Ghz | CCSA [23] | 130170.3949 | 130171.5986 | 130174.0722 | 0.7531 | 2.028 | 2.10 GHz-2.0 GB | OSE-CSA [59] | 130169.9367 | 130170.8301 | 130175.178 | 0.85519 | 3.4412 | 2.0 GHz- 2.0 GB | ICSA | 130169.962 | 130173.9 | 130233.5 | 8.6509 | 0.9153 | | 4.2 | GA [9] | - | 198831.690 | - | - | 940.93 | 0.7 Ghz | IGA-MUM [9] | - | 195274.060 | - | - | 255.45 | 0.7 Ghz | CCSA [23] | 195258.7847 | 195264.3818 | 195271.7057 | 2.4857 | 3.036 | 2.10 Ghz-2.0 GB | OSE-CSA [59] | 195255.9077 | 195257.5392 | 195262.3724 | 1.4674 | 5.3352 | 2.0 Ghz- 2.0 GB | ICSA | 195255.762 | 195260.2 | 195269.4 | 2.8002 | 1.5892 | 2.40 Ghz- 4.0 GB |
|
|