Research Article
A Simulated Annealing Heuristic for the Capacitated Green Vehicle Routing Problem
Table 5
Performance comparison for large GVRP instances.
| Instance | MCWS | DBCA | VNS/TS | SA | T C (miles) | N | C S | Time (s) | T C (miles) | N | C S | Time (s) | T C (miles) | N | C S | Time (s) | T C (miles) | N | C S | Time (s) |
| 111c21s | 5626.64 | 20 | 109 | NA | 5626.64 | 20 | 109 | NA | 4797.15 | 17 | 109 | 1305.6 | 4648.24 | 18 | 109 | 41.40 | 200c21s | 10428.6 | 35 | 190 | NA | 10413.59 | 36 | 191 | NA | 8963.46 | 35 | 192 | 4599 | 8847.24 | 35 | 192 | 75.38 | 300c21s | 14242.6 | 49 | 281 | NA | 14229.92 | 49 | 282 | NA | 12594.77 | 46 | 283 | 10934 | 12334.6 | 49 | 283 | 123.96 | 350c21s | 16471.5 | 57 | 329 | NA | 16460.3 | 57 | 329 | NA | 14323.02 | 51 | 329 | 13922 | 14326.6 | 56 | 329 | 128.26 | 400c21s | 19472.1 | 67 | 378 | NA | 19099.04 | 66 | 373 | NA | 16850.21 | 61 | 378 | 18307 | 16561 | 69 | 378 | 154.04 | 450c21s | 21854.2 | 75 | 424 | NA | 21854.19 | 75 | 424 | NA | 18521.23 | 68 | 424 | 31531 | 18497.2 | 76 | 424 | 176.69 | 500c21s | 24527.5 | 84 | 471 | NA | 24517.08 | 84 | 471 | NA | 21170.9 | 76 | 471 | 21361 | 20887.8 | 83 | 471 | 203.42 |
| 111c22s | 5610.57 | 20 | 109 | NA | | | | | 4802.16 | 17 | 109 | 1413.6 | 4646.8 | 18 | 109 | 41.72 | 111c24s | 5412.48 | 20 | 109 | NA | | | | | 4786.96 | 17 | 109 | 1314 | 4679.73 | 18 | 109 | 41.24 | 111c26s | 5408.38 | 20 | 109 | NA | | | | | 4778.62 | 17 | 109 | 1507.2 | 4671.94 | 18 | 109 | 40.79 | 111c28s | 5331.93 | 20 | 109 | NA | | | | | 4799.15 | 17 | 109 | 1450.2 | 4650.9 | 18 | 109 | 39.45 |
| Average | 12216.9 | | | NA | 16028.68 | | | NA | 10580.69 | | | 9785.84 | 10432.00 | | | 96.94 |
|
|
T C = total cost, N = number of tours, C S = customers served.
|