On Flight Risk Quantitative Evaluation under Icing Conditions

<div>Time delay (<span class="nowrap"><svg height="6.25863pt" id="M28" style="vertical-align:-0.1933298pt" version="1.1" viewbox="-0.0498162 -6.0653 6.96327 6.25863" width="6.96327pt" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,0,0)"><path d="M515 461L483 468C463 439 452 438 425 438C350 438 285 442 225 442C87 442 40 359 21 322L50 298C93 355 138 365 217 360C197 286 173 196 152 92C149 77 147 63 147 52C147 5 171 -12 199 -12C273 -12 353 56 385 103L367 134C341 107 305 83 289 83C279 83 274 97 283 147C292 198 312 290 329 353C358 352 385 350 408 350C433 350 458 351 471 356C479 369 499 415 515 461Z"></path></g></svg>)</span> distribution of the pilot.</div>

Mathematical Problems in Engineering

fig2

Figure 2

Figure 2: On Flight Risk Quantitative Evaluation under Icing Conditions 