Research Article
Research on Construction Safety Risk Assessment of New Subway Station Close-Attached Undercrossing the Existing Operating Station
Table 13
Comparison of the third-level index data of “existing subway station.”
| Third-level index | Risk assessment result | Corresponding risk grade of risk assessment | Actual engineering measurement result | Corresponding risk grade of actual measurement | Consistency |
| Absolute settlement value of station structure (mm) | 3.5 | Medium risk | 5.5 | Medium risk | Yes | Horizontal displacement of the station structure (mm) | 2.2 | Low risk | 2.9 | Low risk | Yes | Differential settlement of station structure deformation joint (mm) | 0.8 | Low risk | 0.7 | Low risk | Yes | Crack width of station structure (mm) | 0.16 | Medium risk | 0.1 | Medium risk | Yes | Orbital height difference (Vector value) (mm) | 1.8 | Low risk | 0.5 | Low risk | Yes | Transverse elevation difference of track (mm) | 1.9 | Low risk | 1.7 | Low risk | Yes | Void amount of track-bed (mm) | 4.2 | Medium risk | 3.0 | Medium risk | Yes | Area power outage renovation (h/times) | 0.3 | Low risk | 0.2 | Low risk | Yes | Circuit failure (times/month) | 0.6 | Low risk | 0.5 | Low risk | Yes | System blocking (h/times) | 0.9 | Low risk | 0.6 | Low risk | Yes | Pipeline damage (times/month) | 1.1 | Medium risk | 0.7 | Low risk | No | Equipment sampling pass rate (%) | 97 | Low risk | 96 | Low risk | Yes | Equipment failures (times/month) | 12 | Low risk | 10 | Low risk | Yes | Equipment renewal rate (%) | 2.6 | Low risk | 2.1 | Low risk | Yes | Equipment pending repair rate (%) | 5.7 | Medium risk | 3.6 | Low risk | No |
|
|