Research Article

Modeling and Estimation of Production Rate in Ornamental Stones Sawing Based on Brittleness Indexes

Table 7

The relative error analysis of estimated production rate of two types of models for 11 rock samples.

Sample no.Rock typePR (m2/h)B2 based model PR (m2/h)B1 and B2 based model PR (m2/h)B2 based model relative error ()B1 and B2 based model relative error ()

1Afyon tigerskin marble11.2810.994411.8944-2.53175.4473
2Afyon white marble7.289.33169.458428.181429.9235
3Karacabey black limestone8.2311.59939.321340.939113.2599
4Manyas white marble15.3315.165816.1219-1.07115.1656
5Marmara white marble16.2213.963415.7515-13.9127-2.8884
6Milas white marble8.637.84987.4839-9.0401-13.2806
7Eskisehir supreme limestone12.3210.097612.055-18.0387-2.1514
8Karahallı white marble11.8513.81111.477216.5482-3.1458
9Karahallı gray marble13.3812.783912.0826-4.4555-9.6967
10Mustafa Kemal Pasa white marble12.2511.318611.3948-7.6035-6.9808
11Sivaslı purple marble7.046.82916.7433-2.996-4.215

PR: Production rate.