Research Article  Open Access
Training Sequence Design of TDSOFDM Signal in Joint Radar and Communication System
Abstract
In the joint radar and communication system, using orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) signals, cyclic prefix (CP) and pilots lead to the problem of high peak at the sidelobe (PSL) level in autocorrelation function (ACF), which deteriorates the radar detection performance seriously. To solve this problem, first, a new RadCom signal based on timedomain synchronization OFDM (TDSOFDM) was proposed. TDSOFDM adopts training sequence (TS) for guard interval, as well as synchronization and channel estimation, so that CP and pilots can be avoided. And then, ambiguity function (AF) of TDSOFDM RadCom signal was analyzed. Finally, TS are optimized to suppress PSL of TDSOFDM signal and maintain the autocorrelation properties of TS simultaneously. The results show that the autocorrelation performance of designed TDSOFDM RadCom signal is much better than that of CPOFDM RadCom signal. Considering the importance of radar target detection, TDSOFDM is more appropriate than CPOFDM for the RadCom system.
1. Introduction
Joint radar and communication (RadCom) is proposed as a technology using a single signal to accomplish both radar and communication functions, which can not only effectively reduce the load of the platform, energy consumption, and electromagnetic interference, but also greatly improve the utilization of energy and spectrum, thus receiving much attention from military and civil fields [1–4].
Orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) is a multicarrier data transmission technology which has been widely used in communication system. Due to the flexibility in waveform design, OFDM has also been gradually utilized in radar [5–7], thus becoming a suitable RadCom signal waveform. To improve data transmission rate, the pulse signal consisted of multiple OFDM symbols that were used in RadCom system [8–12]. To mitigate intersymbol interference (ISI), cyclic prefix (CP) of appropriate length has been used among OFDM symbols as guard interval (GI).
The application of CP suppresses the intercarrier interference (ICI) and improves the orthogonality of subcarriers. However, when CPOFDM signal is utilized in the RadCom system, CP, the replication of the later section of OFDM data block, will inevitably cause the high level sidelobes of autocorrelation function (ACF). Moreover, the CP sidelobe level increases with the length ratio of CP and OFDM data block. In addition, to achieve communication synchronization and channel estimation, pilots must be used in CPOFDM RadCom signal, but the pilot symbols will also lead to the problem of pilot sidelobes. Those sidelobes deteriorate the performance of radar target detection; thus the application of OFDM radarcommunication integration will be severely restricted.
To address the problem, a solution is put forward in [13, 14]; that is, zero padding is performed for the CP and pilot tones of the reference signal before the correlation with echo signal. However, despite the effective elimination of the CP and pilot sidelobes, such approach will greatly deteriorate the target detection performance result of the decline of pulse gain caused by the loss of signal energy. In this paper, a new form of RadCom signal based on TDSOFDM is proposed, where CP is replaced by training sequences (TS) as guard interval while being employed in communication synchronization and channel estimation. Accordingly, CP and pilot sidelobes can be avoided as neither cyclic prefix nor pilot tones is required.
Being matured in communication, TDSOFDM is a key technology in the standard of digital television terrestrial broadcasting (DTTB), whose application is successful in China, Cuba, Cambodia, etc. [15–17], so what is mainly studied in this paper is the performance of TDSOFDM RadCom signal in radar application. Firstly, the ambiguity function (AF) of TDSOFDM RadCom signal is deduced. And then, a TS design criterion is proposed, based on which, genetic algorithm is used to search optimal TS; finally, the TDSOFDM RadCom signal with good performance both in radar and communication is generated.
The rest of the paper is organized as follows. The TDSOFDM RadCom signal model is presented in Section 2 and the derivation of AF of TDSOFDM RadCom waveform is described in Section 3. Then the optimization procedure and simulation results analysis of TDSOFDM waveform follow in Sections 4 and 5. Finally, conclusions are drawn in Section 6.
2. Signal Model
As shown in Figure 1, designed TDSOFDM RadCom system adopts pulse radar signal, where each pulse consists of OFDM symbols. Each OFDM symbol is composed of a TS and an OFDM data block, with the duration of and , respectively. Then, the envelope of a TDSOFDM RadCom pulse is presented as the sum of the following two parts:where is the TSstring composed of TS, is the data blocks of OFDM symbols, and are their amplitudes, respectively, and there is .where is the th code element of th TS, which is assigned as and satisfies the energy normalized condition of . is the number of code elements in a TS, is the duration of a code element satisfying , and is the bandwidth of TDSOFDM signal. is the duration of a complete OFDM symbol, and is the rectangular function. In (3), is the number of subcarriers, is the frequency interval between adjacent subcarriers, and to keep the orthogonality of subcarriers. is the data transmitted on the th subcarrier of the th OFDM symbol, which can be modulated by phase shift keying (PSK) modulation or quadrature amplitude modulation (QAM). at different locations is independent and satisfies the expectation and the energy normalized condition of .
3. Derivation of Ambiguity Function
Ambiguity function demonstrates the delayDoppler characteristics of the radar signal, making it an important tool for studying radar signal and waveform design. In this section, AF of TDSOFDM RadCom signal is deduced in detail.
3.1. Ambiguity Function of TDSOFDM RadCom Signal
For general point targets, the following narrowband AF can be used for analysis:where is time delay and is Doppler shift. Substituting (1) into (4), AF of TDSOFDM RadCom signal can be derivedwhere , . and are the selfambiguity functions of TSstring and OFDM data blocks, respectively; and are crossambiguity functions of TSstring and OFDM data blocks. Since , the expectation of crossambiguity function . Thus, if we take the expected value of both sides of (5), there is the following.
In fact, increasing the timebandwidth product of OFDM pulse can effectively reduce the variance of [18]. Thus, the following approximation is reasonable for the signal with high timebandwidth product.In addition, phasecoherent accumulation technology is generally used in modern radar, which can lower the variance of ACF further. Combining (6) and (7), approximately equals the weighted sum of and about energy ratio. The following two subsections will derive these two AFs, respectively.
3.2. Ambiguity Function of OFDM Data Blocks
First, we deduce the AF of OFDM data blocks. According to the definition of AF, (4) can be represented asand, substituting (3) into (8), AF of is as follows.Let , and the integral term in (9) is as follows.The integral is discussed in two cases:
① when ,
② when ,and, combining (11) and (12), we can get the analytical expression of the integral aswhere . Substituting (12) into (9) yields the following.
Equation (14) indicates that expectation value of the OFDM data segment’s AF depends on the crosscorrelation function . When or , and represent modulation data in different symbols or subcarriers, which are independent according to the hypothesis above, hence the crosscorrelation function equals zero. will only have a nonzero value in case and . This results in the following expression.Specifically, when QAM modulation is adopted, the right side of (15) should be . For simplicity, PSK modulation is assumed here. combining (14) and (15), the expectation of AF of can be finally expressed as follows.Equation (16) indicates that is nonzero only within the delay range of a single symbol, where the rest are all zero. Figure 2(a) shows a function graph of the OFDM data segment’s AF, which is generally ideally thumbtacktyped.
(a)
(b)
(c)
3.3. Ambiguity Function of TSString
According to the definition, substituting (2) into (4), AF of TSstring is as follows.Similar to the deriving process of (10) to (13), we can derive the integral term in (17); the final expression of TSstring’s AF is presented aswhere and . And the value range of is determined by the value of and . Let ; hence and . Therefore we can get the zerodelay cut of AF.
As the amplitude of is constant, (19) indicates that Doppler tolerance of TSstring is independent of the TS. Therefore, the impact on Doppler tolerance is out of consideration when designing TSstring. Moreover, assigning and letting , we can get the range autocorrelation sequence of TSstring.As shown in (20), when , equals the sum of ACF of TS in the range of ; when , equals the sum of crosscorrelation function of different TS in the range of . Thus, as shown in Figure 2(b), grating lobes are found on the AF along the delay axis. To reduce PSL, training sequences should be designed to ensure both good autocorrelation and crosscorrelation.
Substituting (16) and (18) into (6), AF of TDSOFDM RadCom signal is obtained as shown in Figure 2(c), whose mathematical expression is no more described here. As can be seen from Figure 2, AF sidelobes of TDSOFDM RadCom signal are mainly caused by TSstring, and thus it is necessary to optimize it. And on the zerodelay cut of AF, the function value is about 0.9 at the position of normalized Doppler shift of =0.25, which indicates that its Doppler tolerance is consistent with conventional OFDM RadCom signal [19].
4. Design of Training Sequences
PSL of radar signal is an important factor affecting radar target detection. In this section, PSL of average ACF of TDSOFDM signals, denoted as PSL_{0}, is used as one of the objective functions where is the expectation of autocorrelation sequence of TDSOFDM RadCom signal. To reduce the sidelobes of OFDM data blocks within the delay range of , Hamming window function was used in the autocorrelation operation.
On the other hand, to realize robust communication synchronization and channel estimation, TS itself should be well autocorrelated. Let represent the aperiodic autocorrelation sequence of th TS.And the other objective function is the maximal peak sidelobe of N TS.
Thus, the final optimizing criterion is minimizing the weighted sum of average peak sidelobe of TDSOFDM signal and maximal peak sidelobe of TS, which is presented as the following fitness function:where and are, respectively, the weights of two costs, and . As (24) involves a nonlinear multivariable optimization problem, genetic algorithm (GA) is utilized for designing TS. The flow chart of GA is depicted in Figure 3, and the algorithm flow is as follows.
Step 1. Initialize the population with numbers randomly produced by 0 and 1. For example, if there are two TS in a TSstring, and each TS contains four code elements, the population size is four. Thus, can be represented aswhere each row of represents an individual.
Step 2. Calculate fitness value according to the fitness function represented by (24), and adjust the weights and to balance PSL_{0} and .
Step 3 (select operators). According to the individual fitness, select superior individuals and eliminate inferior individuals by roulette selection.
Step 4 (cross operators). Recombine individuals with onepoint crossover method.
Step 5 (mutate operators). Mutate individual gene values with 0.1 mutation probability.
Step 6 (terminate). When the iterations number reaches its maximum, the genetic algorithm completes and the optimization operation can be terminated. If the termination condition is not satisfied, go back to Step 2 to continue the optimization process.
Besides, the time complexity of GA is linearly increasing with iterative times and input size. When using the termination strategy above, the time complexity of GA can be approximately described as , where is the maximum iterative times. and represent the amount and the length of TS, respectively.
5. Simulation Result and Analysis
In the following simulations, GA parameters are as follows: the number of individuals is 100, maximum number of generations is 120, generation gap is 0.9, and weight =0.8.
5.1. Algorithm Simulation
We first optimize the TDSOFDM RadCom signal with high timebandwidth product whose parameters are shown in Table 1. The iterative process is shown in Figure 4. As the number of iterations increases, fitness of the population decreases gradually. ACF of the designed TS is shown in Figure 5 which contains 4 curves, and each curve represents a TS of the TSstring. As shown in Figure 5, maximal PSL of all training sequences is 15.99 dB, enabling the signal to achieve robust communication synchronization and channel estimation performance.

By using the designed TSstring, average ACF of TDSOFDM signal is shown in Figure 6. As shown in the figure, PSL_{0} of the signal is 32.46 dB, which means the designed signal on average is able to detect weak targets.
5.2. Analysis of Impact of Correlation Noise
In the ACF of TDSOFDM signals, there are accompanying noiselike floors which are caused by the random OFDM data. Therefore, the instantaneous PSL of random TDSOFDM signal will be lower than PSL_{0}. The noiselike effect of the random components in the transmitted signal is described as correlation noise in [20]. In the presence of correlation noise, PSL is reduced as where represents the power ratio of signal to correlation noise. For one OFDM symbol, equals the subcarrier number M [18]. Furthermore, after the use of N symbols within each pulse and coherent integration of P pulses, becomeswhere MN is also the timebandwidth product of OFDM data blocks. Equations (26) and (27) indicate that by increasing the number of timebandwidth product or phasecoherent accumulation pulse, PSL will gradually approach PSL_{0}.
To verify this analysis, in this subsection, after phasecoherent accumulation of P pulses, ACF of designed TDSOFDM signals with low and high timebandwidth product were simulated, respectively, and P equals 1, 4, 16, and 64.
Figure 7 shows ACF of TDSOFDM RadCom signal with low timebandwidth product, whose parameters are N=4, M=32, K=8, B=20MHz, and PSL_{0}=28.52. As shown in the figure, correlation noise leads to a significant fluctuation of ACF, and PSL of a single pulse is only about 20dB. With the growth of accumulation pulse number, the fluctuation of ACF decreases gradually. When P is 64, PSL is about 28dB, which is very close to PSL_{0}.
Figure 8 shows the ACF of TDSOFDM RadCom signal with high timebandwidth product, whose parameters are the same as Table 1 (PSL_{0}=32.46dB). As the timebandwidth product is high, the fluctuation of sidelobe decreases relatively. PSL reaches about 32dB after phasecoherent accumulation of just 16 pulses. In addition, by comparing Figures 6 and 8, it is obvious that, with the growth of pulse number of coherent accumulation, ACF of the TDSOFDM signal approaches its expectation gradually.
This simulation indicates that, as the technology of phasecoherent accumulation is generally used in modern radar, even if the timebandwidth product of the signal is not high enough, ACF can also approach its expectation by using more pulses in phasecoherent accumulation, which means the signal design method based on optimizing average PSL is effective.
Furthermore, simulation of range ACF of CPOFDM RadCom signal after phasecoherent accumulation of 16 pulses is also conducted in the same condition in Table 1. As shown in Figure 9, the CP sidelobes are about 15dB and pilot sidelobes of different sizes are also found in ACF of CPOFDM RadCom signal. By comparing Figures 8 and 9, we can find that the autocorrelation performance of optimized TDSOFDM RadCom signal is much better than that of CPOFDM RadCom signal.
5.3. Performance Comparison
As pseudorandom noise (PN) sequences are usually used in conventional TDSOFDM communication signal, in this subsection, we compare the optimized sequence with m sequence and Gold sequence about the performance of and PSL_{0.} The data of three different sequence lengths is shown in Table 2, which is obtained in a random experiment. The table shows that of m sequence is the highest while PSL_{0} is low, making it only suitable for communication. On the contrary, PSL_{0} of Gold sequence is higher because of the good crosscorrelation, but is the lowest. In contrast, the optimized sequence with different lengths is superior in both two properties, demonstrating the effectiveness of optimization algorithm. Furthermore, the performance of optimized sequence is relatively improved with the increase of sequence length. Because the increase of length leads to higher freedom of designing. In addition, the lengths of m sequence and Gold sequence cannot meet the needs of complex wireless transmission environment as their lengths are restricted by , while our method is not limited by sequence length which has greater flexibility.

The elapsed time of the GA program is shown in Table 3. The specification of computer is as follows: CPU is quad core at 2.4 GHz, 8GB RAM, operating system is Windows 10, and platform is MATLAB 2016a. As the optimization method is independent of communication data, TSstring should be renewed only when the signal’s parameters change. Therefore, RadCom system does not demand much of the realtime characteristics, which means GA can almost meet the requirement of RadCom system in time complexity.

6. Conclusion
To address the problem of CP and pilot sidelobes in conventional CPOFDM RadCom signal, a novel RadCom signal based on TDSOFDM is proposed in this paper. AF of proposed signal was analyzed in detail. And then, TS are optimized to suppress PSL of TDSOFDM signal and maintain the autocorrelation properties of TS simultaneously, thus achieving good performance in both radar and communication. Although, the TS and the OFDM data block cause mutual interference to each other, thus more calculation has to be costed to achieve reliable timedomain channel estimation and frequencydomain data detection in TDSOFDM systems. Generally, considering the importance of autocorrelation of the signal to radar target detection, TDSOFDM is more appropriate than CPOFDM for the RadCom system.
Data Availability
The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
References
 P. Kumari, J. Choi, N. GonzalezPrelcic, and R. W. Heath, “IEEE 802.11adbased radar: an approach to joint vehicular communicationradar system,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 67, no. 4, pp. 3012–3027, 2018. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. Moghaddasi and K. Wu, “Multifunctional transceiver for future radar sensing and radio communicating datafusion platform,” IEEE Access, p. 1, 2016. View at: Google Scholar
 C. Sturm and W. Wiesbeck, “Waveform design and signal processing aspects for fusion of wireless communications and radar sensing,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 99, no. 7, pp. 1236–1259, 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 G. C. Tavik and I. D. Olin, “The advanced multifunction RF concept (AMRFC) test bed,” IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 1009–1020, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
 N. Levanon and E. Mozeson, “Multicarrier radar signal—Pulse train and CW,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 707–720, 2002. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 T. Zhang and X. G. Xia, “OFDM synthetic aperture radar imaging with sufficient cyclic prefix,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 394–404, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
 S. Sen, “PAPRconstrained paretooptimal waveform design for OFDMSTAP Radar,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 52, no. 6, pp. 3658–3669, 2014 (Danish). View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y. Liu, G. Liao, Z. Yang, and J. Xu, “Multiobjective optimal waveform design for OFDM integrated radar and communication systems,” Signal Processing, vol. 141, pp. 331–342, 2017. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y. Liu, G. Liao, Z. Yang, and J. Xu, “Design of integrated radar and communication system based on MIMOOFDM waveform,” Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 669–680, 2017. View at: Google Scholar
 Y. Liu, G. Liao, J. Xu, Z. Yang, and Y. Zhang, “Adaptive OFDM Integrated Radar and Communications Waveform Design Based on Information Theory,” IEEE Communications Letters, vol. 21, no. 10, pp. 2174–2177, 2017. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. H. Dokhanchi, M. R. Shankar, T. Stifter, and B. Ottersten, “OFDMbased automotive joint radarcommunication system,” in Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE Radar Conference (RadarConf18), pp. 0902–0907, Oklahoma City, OK, April 2018. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y. Zhou, H. Zhou, F. Zhou, Y. Wu, and V. C. Leung, “Resource allocation for a wireless powered integrated radar and communication system,” IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 253–256, 2019. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 X. Wan, Z. Zhao, D. Zhang, and Q. Shao, “HF passive bistatic radar based on DRM illuminators,” in Proceedings of the IEEE CIE International Conference on Radar, vol. 1, IEEE, October 2011. View at: Google Scholar
 Z. Zhao, X. Wan, D. Zhang, and F. Cheng, “An experimental study of HF passive bistatic radar via hybrid skysurface wave mode,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 415–424, 2013. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 W. Zhang, Y. Guan, W. Liang, D. He, F. Ju, and J. Sun, “An introduction of the chinese DTTB standard and analysis of the PN595 working modes,” IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 8–13, 2007. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 D. Linglong, W. Zhaocheng, and Y. Zhixing, “Compressive sensing based time domain synchronous OFDM transmission for vehicular communications,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 31, no. 9, pp. 460–469, 2013. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Z. Gao, C. Zhang, Z. Wang, and S. Chen, “Prioriinformation aided iterative hard threshold: a lowcomplexity highaccuracy compressive sensing based channel estimation for TDSOFDM,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 242–251, 2015. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 R. F. Tigrek, W. J. A. De Heij, and P. Van Genderen, “OFDM signals as the radar waveform to solve doppler ambiguity,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 130–143, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 G. E. A. Franken, H. Nikookar, and P. Van Genderen, “Doppler tolerance of OFDMcoded radar signals,” in Proceedings of the 3rd European Radar Conference, IEEE, September 2006. View at: Google Scholar
 S. R. J. Axelsson, “Noise radar using random phase and frequency modulation,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 42, no. 11, pp. 2370–2384, 2004. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
Copyright
Copyright © 2019 Jiajun Zuo et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.