Optimal Selection of Stimulation Wells Using a Fuzzy Multicriteria Methodology

Table 3

Input data used in the sample case.

Code name	Reserve capacity							Deliverability			Hydraulic efficiency				Goal
	TH	POR	SGT	GR	NR	DEN	SON	SPI	LTG	LRDD	DCR	PRE	SLU	SAN	IP
Well 1	9.0	6.0	38	78.0	9.8	2.51	64.1	1.77	2.63	18.3	3.1	184.2	76.7	39.6	2.4
Well 2	12.0	8.5	42	64.5	14.5	2.47	66.0	1.77	2.18	7.0	3.2	152.2	69.3	31.2	5.1
Well 3	6.0	6.3	32	80.8	14.8	2.48	68.2	1.77	2.63	8.8	3.0	103.6	77.8	17.4	3.0
Well 4	7.5	7.0	53	69.5	11.5	2.47	69.8	1.77	2.63	16.0	3.2	106.7	61.0	23.3	5.2
Well 5	13.3	6.7	44	77.8	13.4	2.48	71.0	1.77	2.63	10.7	3.5	215.1	106.4	50.5	5.8
Well 6	5.8	9.7	54	87.8	13.4	2.46	71.0	1.77	2.63	10.7	3.5	92.8	45.9	20.0	4.0
Well 7	12.0	9.5	48	70.8	13.3	2.48	70.8	3.42	2.63	28.5	3.0	238.8	142.7	48.0	5.3
Well 8	17.1	5.9	40	80.5	11.4	2.5	67.8	1.77	2.18	12.5	3.5	187.4	98.3	41.0	3.4
Well 9	18.9	3.9	45	78.2	6.9	2.54	67.5	3.42	2.63	28.0	3.5	226.5	100.8	49.1	2.6
Well 10	20.5	10.8	54	63.3	14.3	2.4	72.3	1.77	2.63	7.6	3.6	512.5	278.4	112.8	8.6
Well 11	22.0	9.5	52	61.3	17.5	2.43	71.0	1.77	2.18	7.0	3.9	449.8	224.6	101.2	6.5
Well 12	6.0	6.3	32	82.0	14.8	2.48	68.2	1.77	2.63	8.8	3.0	67.9	33.3	21.4	3.0
Well 13	17.9	9.0	44	69.5	14.5	2.43	71.5	1.77	2.18	10.3	3.5	106.9	62.5	21.5	6.7
Well 14	16.8	9.7	29	88.0	16.7	2.44	71.5	1.77	2.63	5.8	3.2	77.8	43.4	16.8	4.8
Well 15	12.0	9.2	49	70.8	12.6	2.45	72.1	3.42	2.63	14.5	3.2	121.1	63.2	26.4
Well 16	17.9	9.0	44	69.5	14.5	2.42	71.5	1.77	2.63	10.3	3.5	103.3	60.4	21.5
Well 17	7.5	7.0	53	69.5	11.5	2.46	69.8	1.77	2.63	16.0	3.2	106.7	61.0	23.3
Well 18	15.0	9.6	46	81.0	11.9	2.48	69.5	1.77	2.18	16.0	3.2	189.2	98.8	42.0
Well 19	12.8	9.1	36	78.0	14.7	2.42	71.5	1.77	2.63	5.8	3.3	94.8	46.3	20.5