Mathematical Problems in Engineering

Mathematical Problems in Engineering / 2019 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2019 |Article ID 5159497 |

Zhongwei Gao, Donghui Ma, Xiaodong Guo, Wei Wang, Zhitao Wang, "The Comprehensive Assessment Method of Concrete Damage after Disastrous Fire Based on Game Theory-Normal Cloud Model", Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2019, Article ID 5159497, 9 pages, 2019.

The Comprehensive Assessment Method of Concrete Damage after Disastrous Fire Based on Game Theory-Normal Cloud Model

Academic Editor: Jose A. Lozano-Galant
Received31 Aug 2018
Accepted14 Jan 2019
Published07 Feb 2019


Rapidly and correctly assessing the extent of the damage to a concrete structure after a disastrous fire has great engineering significance. In this paper, an assessment method is proposed based on the game theory-normal cloud model. The surface colors of concrete, exfoliation, cracks, and hammering responses are chosen as the comprehensive assessment indices of concrete damage after fire to establish the corresponding assessment criteria. The normal cloud generator is used to calculate the certainty degree of the grading assessment index of concrete damage after fire. By adopting game theory, the objective weight obtained by the information entropy method and the subjective weight obtained by precedence chart are combined into a comprehensive weight. The comprehensive certainty degree value of concrete damage after fire is then calculated by certainty and weight matrices. The project case analysis shows the assessment results are both intuitive and realistic. This method provides a new approach to the assessment of concrete damage after fire which is more efficient and easier to apply than existing methods.

1. Introduction

The fire resistance performance of buildings has been widely researched [1]; however, there is little work on safety assessment, maintenance, and reinforcement of buildings following a disastrous fire. Safety inspection and appraisal should be made of the building after any such fire. Maintenance and reinforcement are also likely to be needed before the building can be used again, and buildings that cannot be appropriately repaired should be condemned and demolished. Therefore, the assessment of the damage grade of buildings after a disastrous fire has great engineering significance.

Currently, researchers generally adopt methods such as the numerical simulation method [2], ultrasonic testing [3, 4], colorimetric analysis [5, 6], the drilling resistance test [6, 7], and petrographic examination [8] to assess the damage grade of concrete after a disastrous fire. These methods have both advantages and disadvantages. For example, the numerical simulation method can calculate the damage extent and remaining bearing capacities, but the stringent professional requirements of the necessary assessors have limited the popularity and application of this method to a certain extent. The ultrasonic testing method has good sensitivity; even slight damage can be detected. However, there are still some disadvantages: it is time-consuming, cracks and defects in the concrete may greatly influence the results, and the detecting surface must be flat (the method is not suitable for sprayed concrete or concrete with exfoliation). The colorimetric analysis method is simple and fast and can be easily performed without expertise. Its only shortcoming is that cutting and sampling are needed, which limits the application in thin-walled structural members. The drilling resistance test method is a promising technology with advantages including rapid testing speed, easy operation, reliable test results, and not being affected by cracks, roughness of surface, or exfoliation of the concrete. However, it may be affected by drill parameters (type, shape, size, rigidity) and thrust force applied by users, etc. The damage depth of concrete after a disastrous fire can be detected accurately by petrographic examination technology, but this method has high requirements in terms of inspectors and equipment.

In general, most of the methods and technologies available are unsatisfactory, offering either speed or accuracy, never both. Therefore, a more effective method is urgently required to approach the challenge from a new angle.

Taking the macroscopic damage characteristics of concrete after a disastrous fire as assessment indices, an assessment model (cloud model) is built with mathematical tools (fuzzy mathematics theory and probability theory) to carry out pure mathematical calculations that provide reliable results rapidly and accurately.

2. Method

Academician Li Deyi proposed the cloud model theory in 1995 based on research into probability theory and fuzzy set theory [9, 10]. The cloud model can describe the inner relationship between fuzziness and randomness and realize the conversion between qualitative concepts and quantitative characteristics. Nowadays, the cloud model is widely used in fields such as environmental assessment [11], image processing [12], intelligent control [13], and geological forecasting [14].

2.1. Basic Theory of the Cloud Model

The cloud model is defined as follows. Let be a domain of discourse represented by quantitative values and be the qualitative concept on . If the qualitative value is and is a random implementation of the qualitative concept , the certainty degree of with regard to is the random number with steady tendency [15], that is,Then the distribution of on domain is called the cloud, and every is called a cloud droplet.

The cloud model is represented by three basic cloud digital eigenvalues (,,). Here, is the expected value as well as the central value of cloud droplets in spatial distribution. is the entropy as well as the measurement of qualitative degree of each index which is determined by the randomness and fuzziness of the qualitative concept; it not only reflects the dispersion degree of the cloud droplets, but also reflects the value range of the cloud droplet that is acceptable by the qualitative concept in domain space. is the entropy of entropy, called hyperentropy. It is the measurement of entropy's fuzziness and randomness; the greater the value of hyperentropy, the greater the degree of membership, and the greater the thickness of the cloud. Figure 1 is a sketch map of cloud digital eigenvalues (where the expected value =100, the entropy =15, the hyperentropy =1, and the number of cloud droplets N=5000).

2.2. Cloud Model and Generation Steps Based on Forward Cloud Generation

The cloud generator is the arithmetic that is necessary to realize the transformation of quantitative data and qualitative concepts into the cloud model. It can be divided into two types: a forward cloud generator and a backward cloud generator. Forward cloud generation is the process from qualitative description to quantitative representation [16]. The arithmetical steps of forward cloud generation are as follows:

Step 1. Determine , , .

Step 2. Take as the excepted value and as the variance to generate a normal random number .

Step 3. Take as the excepted value and as the variance to generate a normal random number .

Step 4. Calculate the degree of certainty byLet be a cloud droplet, which is a concrete quantitative realization of linguistic terms represented by this cloud. Where, this time, is the corresponding value of qualitative concept in the domain of discourse, is the measurement of the degree of belonging to these linguistic terms.

Step 5. Repeat Steps 2~4 until enough cloud droplets are generated.

2.3. Comprehensive Weight Based on Game Theory

Weight can be divided into objective weight and subjective weight, and each is assigned differently. Subjective weight reflects the willingness and preference of decision makers, while objective weight reflects the degree of contribution of concrete data to decision making in the scheme set. It is beneficial to improve the reliability of assessment results when combining the two kinds of weights. Subjective weight and objective weight can be combined into a comprehensive weight by game theory. In this paper, the objective weight is obtained by the information entropy method and the subjective weight is obtained by precedence chart.

2.3.1. Information Entropy Method

The information entropy method [17] is an objective assignment method which uses measured objective data for assignment. Entropy is an uncertainty measurement based on probability theory; the greater the amount of information, the smaller the corresponding uncertainty, and the smaller the entropy value. It makes the assessment more objective because it can eliminate human disturbance when calculating the weight of each index. The specific calculation method is shown in formulae (3)~(5):

where is the weight assignment of an index and is the value of the th assessment grade of the th assessment index.

where , if , then .

where . As indicated by formula (5), the greater the entropy, the smaller the entropy weight, and the smaller the contribution to assessment results, and vice versa.

2.3.2. Precedence Chart

The precedence chart, a subjective weight assignment method, was initially proposed by Moody in 1983 [18]. It is a checkerboard chart (as shown in Figure 2) comprised of × blanks. The left column of the chart represents the comparison objects, and the top row of the chart represents the objects that are being compared. The blanks of the diagonal represent self-comparisons; these are meaningless, so they do not need to be filled out. There is a wealth of literature describing the calculation points and steps of the precedence chart, so they will not be repeated here [19, 20].

2.3.3. Determining the Comprehensive Weight by Game Theory

When seeking consistency or compromise between different weights, the deviation between possible weights and basic weights can be minimized by game theory, further improving the reliability of assessment results [21]. Calculation steps are as follows:

Step 1 (consistency examination). When n=2, the consistency can be examined by (6) [22].where and are two groups of weights involved in the game; n is the number of index vectors obtained in each weight group. The smaller is, the closer the two groups of weights are. The consistency examination is considered to have been passed when , and the weights can be coupled [23].

Step 2. Seek the most satisfied weight vector.
Seeking the most satisfied in all possible vector sets, that is looking for the most satisfied weight coefficient to minimize the deviation between and each ,The optimized first derivative condition of (7) can be obtained according to the differential properties of the matrix:

Step 3. Normalize the combination coefficient set. Here, can be obtained by normalizing the combination coefficient sets .

Step 4. Calculate the comprehensive weight by (9).

3. Establishing the Assessment Index System

3.1. Assessment Index

The results of assessing concrete after a disastrous fire are closely related to the selection of the assessment index. Selecting the assessment index correctly is the precondition to ensure the assessment results are reasonable and reliable. Based on widely used specifications and previous experiences [2, 24, 25], 4 representative assessment indices, specifically the surface colors of concrete (), exfoliation (), cracks (), and hammering responses () are chosen to be the indices for the assessment of concrete damage after fire, so as to establish the assessment index system.

3.2. Grade Division Standard of the Assessment Indices

The damage to concrete after a disastrous fire ranges over 5 grades: minor damage (grade I), mild damage (grade II), moderate damage (grade III), serious damage (grade IV), and destroyed (grade V) according to literature [25]. The corresponding relationship between assessment grades and damage state, as well as maintenance measures of concrete after a disastrous fire, is listed in Table 1. With reference to literature [2, 25], in combination with fire investigation and expert experience, each assessment index is graded and valued. The grading and valuing standards are listed in Tables 25.

GradesDamage state and maintenance measures

IMinor, not directly burned, the structural material and performance are uncompromised; no measures need to be taken.

IIMild, the structural material and performance are compromised slightly; only measures to improve durability need to be taken.

IIIModerate, the structural material and performance are obviously compromised, but the structural safety is not compromised. Measures for improving durability and local processing, as well as appearance restoration measures, need to be taken immediately.

IVSerious, although not yet destroyed; the structural material and performance are obviously compromised, and clear deformations or cracks appear. Damage adversely affects structural safety or normal working conditions, and reinforcement and local replacement measures should be taken.

VDestroyed, structure or member collapse during or after the fire; structure is seriously burned, deformed, and cracked. The structure loses or mostly loses bearing capacity, and structural safety is imperiled, as well as safety support. Thorough reinforcement and replacement measures should be taken immediately.

Grades Value Damage state

I0.0~0.1Basically unchanged
II0.1~0.25Covered by black
III0.25~0.4Pink or red
V0.75~1.0Pale yellow

Grades Value Damage state

II0.1~0.2 Local mortar cover exfoliate
III0.2~0.45Corner concrete exfoliate
IV0.45~0.8Large area of concrete exfoliate
V0.8~1.0Large area of concrete exfoliate and loose

Grades Value Damage state

II0.1~0.2Minor cracks
III0.2~0.45Cracks appear at the corner concrete
IV0.45~0.75Many cracks
V0.75~1.0Penetrating cracks

Grades Value Damage state

I0.0~0.1Loud sound, hammer leaves no trace on the surface.
II0.1~0.25Loud sound, hammer leaves obvious traces on the surface.
III0.25~0.5Dull sound, the concrete is smashed, and traces are left on the surface.
IV0.5~0.8Dull sound, the concrete is smashed and dented.
V0.8~1.0The sound is weak; the concrete exfoliates significantly.

4. Research Case Fire Disaster

4.1. The Disastrous Fire

The disastrous fire in the study was caused by gas leakage in the ground floor of a commercial and residential building in Nanjiang (hereinafter referred to as “the building”), in Sichuan province at around 13:40 on August 2, 2012. The fire was extinguished at approximately 14:10 that day; a photo of the building taken thereafter is shown in Figure 3.

4.2. Extent and Characteristics of the Fire Damage

The bottom three floors of the building have a frame structure (commercial use) and the upper six floors have a masonry-concrete structure (residential use). A comprehensive inspection of the building's fire area was carried out the day after the fire was extinguished. The results showed that only part of the ground floor where the fire took place was damaged, and the other areas of the ground floor, as well as the rooms on and over the second floor, were unaffected by the fire. In order to explain the problem briefly, only the damage grades of the reinforced concrete floor plates of the building after the disastrous fire are calculated (details of the damage characteristics are given in Table 6, and members’ locations are shown in Figure 4). After the fire, the concrete surfaces of the plates of members P-4 and P-5 appear off-white, a large area of concrete is cracked, loosened, and exfoliated, and the rebar at the bottom of the plate is exposed. The plates are all 100mm thick, and the maximum depths of the loose concrete are 41mm and 43mm, as shown in Figures 5(a) and 5(b), respectively.

Member number Damage characteristics


Notes: represents the reinforced concrete floor plate numbered . The average value of three independent field assessors is used as the final value of the index of concrete floor plate.

5. Comprehensive Assessment Analysis of Concrete Damage after Fire

5.1. Characteristic Parameters of the Cloud Model

The expected value of the comprehensive assessment index of concrete damage after fire can be calculated according to

where and respectively are the interval boundary values of the comprehensive assessment standard of concrete damage after fire.

The interval boundary values are the transition state of two grades, so they may be affiliated with either of the two grades; thus, the certainty degree of the interval boundary values affiliated with both grades is exactly the same, and

The entropy of the cloud model can be calculated by (11), as shown in (12):

The hyperentropy is a constant which reflects the dispersion degree of the cloud model. The values can be adjusted according to the cloud chart of the comprehensive assessment index of concrete damage after fire.

The characteristic parameters of the graded cloud model of concrete damage after fire can be obtained by calculating the data in Tables 25 according to (10) and (12). Each value is 0.01%, as given in Table 7.

GradeAssessment index (%)

III(32.5, 6.37,0.01)(32.5,10.62,0.01)(32.5,10.62,0.01)(37.5,10.62,0.01)

On the basis of the cloud model eigenvalues of the graded comprehensive assessment of concrete damage after fire in Table 7, using the forward cloud generator, 5000 cloud droplets are generated with MATLAB, and the graded cloud chart of the concrete surface color can be generated (shown in Figure 6). The graded cloud charts of the exfoliation , cracks , and hammering responses are similar and are not explained here.

5.2. Determining the Index Weight

The objective weight of each assessment index can be obtained by calculating the data in Tables 25 using (3)~(5); the subjective weight can be obtained by the precedence chart method. Then, can be calculated by substituting and into (8), normalizing , and obtaining the comprehensive weight by substituting the normalized into (9), as listed in Table 8.


Consistency test0.049<0.3

5.3. Comprehensive Certainty Degree of the Cloud Model

The comprehensive certainty degree of the damage grades of concrete after fire can be calculated by

where is the comprehensive certainty degree of corresponding grade of the concrete member , is the comprehensive weight of the th assessment index of concrete member , and is the assessment grade’s average certainty degree of the th assessment index. The damage assessment grade of the concrete member after fire can be calculated according to

6. Results and Discussion

The procedure of forward cloud generation written by MATLAB calculated the data in Table 6 5000 times, and the comprehensive certainty degree was calculated according to the average value of certainty degree . The fire damage grades of the reinforced concrete floor plate can be obtained and compared with the results of the traditional method [24] (as listed in Table 9).

Member No.Comprehensive certainty degree valueComprehensive assessment Traditional method


The results produced by the proposed method for P-2, P-4, P-5, P-7, P-8, P-11, P-13, and P-15 are completely realistic and consistent with the results of the traditional method.

The results produced by the proposed method for P-3, P-10, P-12, P-14, P-16, and P-17 have slightly lower values than those from the traditional method. The traditional method is more conservative than the method in this paper, and the method in this paper is more realistic, accounting for the difference.

The results produced by the proposed method for P-1, P-6, and P-9 indicate that the fire damage of the above members is between grade II and III, biased towards grade III. The results are consistent with the traditional method, but results of the method in this paper are more intuitive.

7. Conclusions

This paper proposed a comprehensive assessment method for concrete damage after fire based on game theory-normal cloud model theory. The specific application of this method was explained in detail with reference to a practical engineering case, and the damage grades of reinforced concrete floor plates after fire were assessed. Then the following main conclusions were drawn.

For the damaged members, the assessment results of this method are completely realistic and consistent with the results of the traditional method; for the members with moderate damage, the assessment results of this method are more objective. Overall, the assessment results of this method are intuitive and reasonable.

Each assessment factor in this method (concrete surface color, exfoliation, cracks, and hammering responses) is easily obtainable; the assessment requirements are not too high; no numerical simulation is required; defects of the inspection surface and concrete have no effect on the results; cutting and sampling on assessment objects is not needed and not affected by the wall thickness of the structural member. In summary, this method is more applicable.

In general, there may be a large number of concrete members damaged in the fire. The common method not only has a high workload but is also inefficient. This method takes full account of the uncertainty and fuzziness of the assessment factors. It is not only simple, but also easy to calculate digitally, making it more efficient.

It must be emphasized that this method only considers the ultimate structural safety of the assessment object, but ignores the displacement and deflection of members that may affect the serviceability (applicability and durability) of the building.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.


The work was supported by “The Five-Year Plan” National Science-technology Support Plan Projects (No. 2013BAK01B03), Technical Research on Protection and Sustainable Utilization for Excellent Historical Buildings in Sichuan Province (Scheme No. HXKX2014/014), National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2018YFD1100902), National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51678017), and Beijing Municipal Education Commission of Science and Technology General Project (Grant No. KM201610005029).


  1. G. Spinardi, L. Bisby, and J. Torero, “A review of sociological issues in fire safety regulation,” Fire Technology, vol. 53, pp. 1–27, 2016. View at: Google Scholar
  2. T. Molkens, R. Van Coile, and T. Gernay, “Assessment of damage and residual load bearing capacity of a concrete slab after fire: Applied reliability-based methodology,” Engineering Structures, vol. 150, pp. 969–985, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. Y. Lin, C. Hsiao, H. Yang, and Y. Lin, “The effect of post-fire-curing on strength–velocity relationship for nondestructive assessment of fire-damaged concrete strength,” Fire Safety Journal, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 178–185, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. U. Dilek, “Assessment of fire damage to a reinforced concrete structure during construction,” Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 257–263, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. R. Felicetti, “Assessment Methods of Fire Damages in Concrete Tunnel Linings,” Fire Technology, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 509–529, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. M. Colombo and R. Felicetti, “New NDT techniques for the assessment of fire-damaged concrete structures,” Fire Safety Journal, vol. 42, no. 6-7, pp. 461–472, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. R. Felicetti, “The drilling resistance test for the assessment of fire damaged concrete,” Cement Concrete Composites, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 321–329, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. J. P. Ingham, “Application of petrographic examination techniques to the assessment of fire-damaged concrete and masonry structures,” Materials Characterization, vol. 60, no. 7, pp. 700–709, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. L. Deyi, M. Haijun, and S. Xuemei, “Membership cloud and membership cloud generator,” Computer Research & Development, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 16–18, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  10. G. Wang, C. Xu, and D. Li, “Generic normal cloud model,” Information Sciences, vol. 280, no. 280, pp. 1–15, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  11. H. Yan, D. Wu, Y. Huang et al., “Water eutrophication assessment based on rough set and multidimensional cloud model,” Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, vol. 164, pp. 103–112, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. É. Ranisavljevic, F. Devin, D. Laffly et al., “A dynamic and generic cloud computing model for glaciological image processing,” International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 109–115, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. S. Namasudra, P. Roy, P. Vijayakumar, S. Audithan, and B. Balusamy, “Time efficient secure DNA based access control model for cloud computing environment,” Future Generation Computer Systems, vol. 73, pp. 90–105, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. J. Liu, G. Wen, and Y. M. Xie, “Layout optimization of continuum structures considering the probabilistic and fuzzy directional uncertainty of applied loads based on the cloud model,” Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 81–100, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. L. M. Zhang, X. G. Wu, Q. Q. Chen et al., “Developing a cloud model based risk assessment methodology for tunnel-induced damage to existing pipelines,” Stochastic Environmental Research Risk Assessment, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 513–526, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. W. Tao and Q. Kun, “Cloud model method in disaster loss assessment,” in Proceedings of the 2009 International Forum on Information Technology and Applications, IFITA 2009, vol. 2, pp. 673–676, China, May 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  17. S. Huang, B. Ming, Q. Huang, G. Leng, and B. Hou, “A Case Study on a Combination NDVI Forecasting Model Based on the Entropy Weight Method,” Water Resources Management, vol. 31, no. 11, pp. 3667–3681, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. Y. Wang and De Tian, “A weighted assembly precedence graph for assembly sequence planning,” The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 83, no. 1-4, pp. 99–115, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. J. C. Feng, W. Han, D. Wang et al., “An equiment support capability assessment method based on Precedence-Chart,” Fire Control Command Control, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 82–90, 2018. View at: Google Scholar
  20. L. Guo, B. Z. He, Y. G. Liu et al., “The application of Precedence chart in the construction project risk analysis,” in Proceedings of the International Conference of Management Engineering and Information Technology, vol. 1 and 2, no. 9, pp. 416–419, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  21. X. L. Wang, G. X. Wang, Y. X. Wu et al., “Comprehensive assessment of regional water usage efficiency control based on game theory weight and a matter-element model,” Water, vol. 113, no. 9, pp. 1–22, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. L. L. Zhang, C. G. Lai, X. H. Chen et al., “Decadal variation and evaluation of flood risk based on the combination weight of game theory,” Tropical Geography, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 1–12, 2018. View at: Google Scholar
  23. Z. Gao, D. Ma, W. Wang, X. Guo, Q. Ge et al., “Development and Application of Ancient Timber Buildings Structural Condition Assessment Model Based on a Fuzzy Matter-Element Model that Includes Asymmetric Proximity,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2018, Article ID 7426915, 12 pages, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. N. Short, J. Purkiss, and S. Guise, “Assessment of fire damaged concrete using colour image analysis,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 9–15, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. China Association for Engineering Construction Standardization, Standard for Building Structural Assessment after Fire CECS 252: 2009, China Planning Press, pp.11-25, 2009.

Copyright © 2019 Zhongwei Gao et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles