Robust Die Compensation in Sheet Metal Design through the Integration of Dual Response Surface and Shape Function Optimization

<p>Model of the standard deviation of <svg height="10.7866pt" id="M121" style="vertical-align:-2.150701pt" version="1.1" viewbox="-0.0498162 -8.6359 9.52083 10.7866" width="9.52083pt" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,0,0)"><path d="M699 368C699 549 574 666 407 666C186 666 23 488 23 277C23 113 129 -3 288 -13L307 -26C431 -111 501 -139 533 -147C559 -154 613 -163 658 -164L666 -141C597 -111 507 -66 430 -11L416 -1C580 42 699 190 699 368ZM601 371C601 227 518 54 381 22L354 40L278 24C175 47 120 145 120 269C120 451 235 631 398 631C540 631 601 521 601 371Z"></path></g></svg> as a function of <svg height="9.14241pt" id="M122" style="vertical-align:-3.1815pt" version="1.1" viewbox="-0.0498162 -5.96091 12.1315 9.14241" width="12.1315pt" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,0,0)"><path d="M545 106L524 126C493 85 467 65 455 65C438 65 427 113 405 238C448 295 498 362 543 439L533 448L478 435C453 386 423 331 398 295H395C370 404 347 448 282 448C169 448 23 309 23 153C23 54 65 -12 128 -12C203 -12 283 70 339 155H341C360 29 380 -12 411 -12C444 -12 491 11 545 106ZM333 204C265 95 210 54 169 54C137 54 113 96 113 171C113 302 191 405 252 405C301 405 318 306 333 204Z"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,7.059,3.132)"><path d="M389 0V32C297 38 291 46 291 118V635C234 613 175 595 109 583V556L161 554C203 552 207 547 207 497V118C207 46 201 38 110 32V0H389Z"></path></g></svg> according to variations of the other variables on the same coded level. Standard deviation of the compensated die in red.</p>

Mathematical Problems in Engineering

fig10

Figure 10

Figure 10: Robust Die Compensation in Sheet Metal Design through the Integration of Dual Response Surface and Shape Function Optimization 