Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2019, Article ID 7501524, 10 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/7501524
Research Article

Improved Performance Prediction of Marine Propeller: Numerical Investigation and Experimental Verification

1School of Mechanical Engineering, Shenyang Institute of Engineering, Shenyang 100136, China
2School of Mechanical Science and Aerospace Engineering, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Chunbao Liu; nc.ude.ulj@oabnuhcuil

Received 4 October 2018; Revised 28 January 2019; Accepted 2 April 2019; Published 18 April 2019

Academic Editor: Jan Koci

Copyright © 2019 Yue Tan et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. E. G. Paterson, R. V. Wilson, and F. Stern, “General-purpose parallel unsteady RANs ship hydrodynamics code: CFDSHIP-Iowa,” Defense Technical Information Center, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. T. Watanabe, T. Kawamura, Y. Takekoshi, M. Maeda, and S. Hyung, “Simulation of steady and unsteady cavitation on a marine propeller using a RANS CFD code,” in Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Cavitation, Osaka, Japan, 2003.
  3. F. D. Felice, M. Felli, M. Liefvendahl, and U. Svennberg, “Numerical and experimental analysis of the wake behavior of a generic submarine propeller,” Prism, vol. 1, no. 8, p. 158, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  4. J. Yao, “Investigation on hydrodynamic performance of a marine propeller in oblique flow by RANS computations,” International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 56–69, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. L. Wang, C. Guo, Y. Su, P. Xu, and T. Wu, “Numerical analysis of a propeller during heave motion in cavitating flow,” Applied Ocean Research, vol. 66, pp. 131–145, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. M. R. Naseer, E. Uddin, K. Rana, and S. Zahir, “Computational validation of hydrodynamic and hydroacoustic performance of marine propeller,” in Proceedings of the 14th International Bhurban Conference on Applied Sciences and Technology, IBCAST 2017, Pakistan, January 2017. View at Scopus
  7. S. Joseph, “Two-phase Eulerian averaged formulation of entropy production for cavitation flow,” University of Manitoba, 2014.
  8. M. Morgut and E. Nobile, “Comparison of hexa-structured and hybrid-unstructured meshing approaches for numerical prediction of the flow around marine propellers,” in Proceedings of The First International Symposium on Marine Propulsors, Trondheim, Norway, 2009.
  9. M. Morgut and E. Nobile, “Influence of grid type and turbulence model on the numerical prediction of the flow around marine propellers working in uniform inflow,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 42, pp. 26–34, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. Q. Zhao, Towards Improvement of Numerical Accuracy for Unstructured Grid Flow Solver, University of Toledo, USA, 2012.
  11. X. Wang and K. Walters, “Computational analysis of marine-propeller performance using transition-sensitive turbulence modeling,” Journal of Fluids Engineering, vol. 134, no. 7, p. 071107, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. G. Dubbioso, R. Muscari, F. Ortolani, and A. Di Mascio, “Analysis of propeller bearing loads by CFD. Part I: Straight ahead and steady turning maneuvers,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 130, pp. 241–259, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. G. Dubbioso, R. Muscari, and A. Di Mascio, “Analysis of the performances of a marine propeller operating in oblique flow,” Computers & Fluids, vol. 75, pp. 86–102, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. G. Dubbioso, R. Muscari, and A. Di Mascio, “Analysis of a marine propeller operating in oblique flow. Part 2: Very high incidence angles,” Computers & Fluids, vol. 92, pp. 56–81, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. C. Yu, Y. Wang, C. Huang, X. Wu, and T. Du, “Large eddy simulation of unsteady cavitating flow around a highly skewed propeller in nonuniform wake,” Journal of Fluids Engineering, vol. 139, no. 4, p. 041302, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. A. Di Mascio, R. Muscari, and G. Dubbioso, “On the wake dynamics of a propeller operating in drift,” Journal of Fluid Mechanics, vol. 754, pp. 263–307, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. N. Chase and P. M. Carrica, “Submarine propeller computations and application to self-propulsion of DARPA Suboff,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 60, pp. 68–80, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. ANSYS® Academic Research, Help System, ANSYS, Inc., 1st edition edition, 2015.
  19. B. E. Launder and D. B. Spalding, Lectures in Mathematical Models of Turbulence, 1972.
  20. C. Chesnakas and S. Jessup, “Experimental characterization of propeller tip flow,” in Proceedings of the 22nd Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, Washington, USA, 1998.
  21. N. E. Gharbi, R. Absi, A. Benzaoui, and E. H. Amara, “Effect of near-wall treatments on airflow simulations,” in Proceedings of the 2009 International Conference on Computational Methods for Energy Engineering and Environment, pp. 185–189, Tunisia, 2009.
  22. T. Bo et al., “Numerical prediction for the hydrodynamic performance of a ferry propeller,” Chinese Journal of Ship Research, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 52–58, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  23. Q. F. Yang, Y. S. Wang, and Z. H. Zhang, “Effects of non-uniform inflow on propeller cavitation hydrodynamics,” Chinese Journal of Hydrodynamics, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 538–550, 2011. View at Google Scholar