Nonlinear Frequency Response Analysis as a Tool for Identification of Adsorption Kinetics: Case Study—Pore-Surface Diffusion Control

<p>(a) Amplitude<i> F</i><sub>1</sub>(<i><i>ω</i></i>) vs. frequency; (b) phase<i> F</i><sub>1</sub>(<i><i>ω</i></i>) vs. frequency; (c) amplitude<i> F</i><sub>2</sub>(<i><i>ω</i></i>,<i><i>ω</i></i>) vs. frequency; (d) phase<i> F</i><sub>2</sub>(<i><i>ω</i></i>,<i><i>ω</i></i>) vs. frequency (<i>D</i><sub><i>p</i></sub>=10<sup>−7</sup> m<sup>2</sup>/s;<i> D</i><sub><i>s</i></sub>= 10<sup>−8</sup> m<sup>2</sup>/s).</p>

Mathematical Problems in Engineering

fig1

Figure 1

Figure 1: Nonlinear Frequency Response Analysis as a Tool for Identification of Adsorption Kinetics: Case Study—Pore-Surface Diffusion Control 