Research Article
A Hybrid Approach for Project Crashing Optimization Strategy with Risk Consideration: A Case Study for an EPC Project
Table 3
Different crash cost for different crash duration.
| Activity | Subsequent activity | Crash Cost (1000USD/DAY) (k = segment 1) | Crash Cost (1000USD/DAY) (k = segment 2) | Crash Cost (1000USD/DAY) (k = segment 3) |
| J (Site Preparation) | B | 0.5 | 1 | 2 |
| A (Design and Subcontracting) | B | 10 | 25 | 30 |
| B (Piling) | C | 5 | 5.5 | 8 |
| C (Foundation) | D | 4 | 4.5 | 7 |
| D (RC 2F) | E | 10 | 20 | - |
| E (RC 3F) | F, G | 10 | 20 | - |
| F (RC 4F) | H | 10 | 20 | - |
| G (Arch. 2F) | H | 20 | 30 | 40 |
| H (Arch. 3F) | I | 25 | 35 | 45 |
| I (Arch. 4F to shelter &Outside) | - (FINISH) | 5 | 8.5 | 10 |
|
|
Note : segment 1: crash duration 1-10 days. Segment 2: crash duration 11-20 days. Segment 3: crash duration ≥ 21 days. |