Mathematical Problems in Engineering

Mathematical Problems in Engineering / 2020 / Article
Special Issue

Control of Networked Systems with Engineering Applications 2020

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2020 |Article ID 1736706 |

Jie Chen, Guang-Hui Xu, Liang Geng, "Multiconsensus of Nonlinear Multiagent Systems with Intermittent Communication", Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2020, Article ID 1736706, 8 pages, 2020.

Multiconsensus of Nonlinear Multiagent Systems with Intermittent Communication

Guest Editor: Hou-Sheng Su
Received18 May 2020
Accepted11 Aug 2020
Published27 Aug 2020


Compared with single consensus, the multiconsensus of multiagent systems with nonlinear dynamics can reflect some real-world cases. This paper proposes a novel distributed law based only on intermittent relative information to achieve the multiconsensus. By constructing an appropriate Lyapunov function, sufficient conditions on control parameters are derived to undertake the reliability of closed-loop dynamics. Ultimately, the availability of results is completely validated by these numerical examples.

1. Introduction

Multiagent systems have attracted much attention in the field as computer science, vehicle systems, unmanned aerial vehicles, or formation flight of spacecraft since 2009. In most of studies on consensus problem, researchers always adopt the same method that makes all agents finally reach the same value in systems [15]. Due to various parameters as sudden changes on environment or cooperative tasks in the reality, the purpose of our research also becomes multiple.

In [6], the consensus problem from asynchronous group of the discrete-time heterogeneous multiagent system under dynamic-change interaction topology is discussed and studied briefly. For different agents, two asynchronous consensus protocols are given in this paper. Based on fixed and switching topology, the multiconsensus of first-order multiagent system is discussed. And we assumed that interactions could reach balance between two subnetworks in [6, 7]. The relationship between multiconsensus ability and the underlying digraph topology is discussed in [8]. For fixed communication networks, the author proposes a consensus protocol which can be applied to two different second-order multiagent systems under the same assumption [9]. By using pinning control method in [1012], we can obtain some criteria on multiconsensus of networks without assuming the balance of network topology. For multiconsensus problem from discrete-time multiagent systems with stochastic and fixed topologies, the author performs a professional study in [13]. In [14], the author performs the research on multiconsensus control of switching-directed interaction and fixed topology in common linear multiagent systems, based on pinning control techniques, matrix analysis theory, and Lyapunov stability theory. The cluster consensus of multiagent dynamical systems with impulsive effects and coupling delays was investigated in [15], where interactions among agents were uncertain.

In other words, above conclusion on the consensus of multiagent system with nonlinear dynamics is mostly based on common assumption that information is transmitted continuously between all agents, which means that each single agent shares the information with its neighbors without any communication constraints. However, this is not the fact in reality. For instance, all agents can only get the information from their neighbors during certain disconnected time intervals, as a reason of communication restrictions. In [1623], intermittent control has attracted more attention. For distributed consensus problem from intermittent control of a time-invariant undirected communication topology in the linear multiagent system, the author designs a type of distributed-observer protocols. In [24], the consensus problem on periodical-intermittent control of second-order agent networks, which is based on matrix theory, Lyapunov control method, and algebraic graph theory, is discussed. Based on the above discussion and research, this paper mainly studies on some characteristics of the second-order multiagent system, such as multiconsensus. In the same subnet, nonlinear dynamics of all agents are the same, while all agents in different subnet have different dynamics. Multiconsensus indicates that all agents in every subgroup can be consistent. Between different groups, there is no consistent value. The research performed in this paper can be summarized as three points: firstly, the multiconsensus of the multiagent system with nonlinear dynamics is studied. Secondly, a novel multiconsensus law, which is devised through intermittent and relative state information, is more general than other second-order multiconsensus protocol. And, in such a protocol, all agents always need to communicate with their neighbors.

In Section 2 of this paper, the research model has been designed. In Section 3, we perform the study and discussion on the multiconsensus problem of second-order multiagent systems with nonlinear dynamics. In Section 4, two numerical examples are given to prove the effectiveness on the designed protocol. And the conclusion is summarized in Section 5.

2. Preliminary

2.1. Algebraic Graph Theory

In general, the communication topology between agents in a multiagent system is described by a directed graph. Let be a system communication topology diagram consisting of N nodes, the vertex set is nonempty finite, the edge set , and a nonsymmetric is nonnegative weighted adjacency matrix. is defined as if and otherwise. There are no self-loops, i.e., . The set of neighbors of agent is denoted by . A directed path is a sequence of distinct vertices such that , .

2.2. Problem Description

Consider a multiagent system with n agents, . Suppose the multiagent system composed with subgroup, is a set of subgroup. Note that the corresponding subtopology graph of each subgroup is , and the topology diagram of the whole system is . The corresponding numbering sets for each subgroup are , , , and . , and for . For , let denote the subscript of the subset to which the integer belongs. It is assumed in what follows that each agent knows which cluster it belongs to.

The dynamics of systems is described as follows:where , , and are the position, velocity, and control input of agent , respectively. The function , describing the intrinsic dynamics of agent , is continuously differentiable.

In this work, the leader in each group is described by

Definition 1. The multiconsensus control for second-order multiagent systems is said to be achieved ifFirstly, some basic assumptions and lemmas are given as follows:

Lemma 1. There is a constant , and are matrices with suitable dimensions. Then, the Kronecker product has the following properties:

Lemma 2. The linear matrix inequalitywhere , and depend affinely on , which is equivalent to .

Lemma 3. Suppose that is positive definite and is symmetric. Then, for , the following inequality holds:

Assumption 1. (1) for all , for all (2)The subgraph and have a directed spanning tree, respectively

Assumption 2. There exist nonnegative constants and such that nonlinear function satisfies the following equality:where .

3. Main Results

In this section, the multiconsensus of multiagent system is analyzed.

The distributed feedback controller of agent is designed aswhere is the control period and is called the control time width.

Let are the measurement error of position and velocity of the th agent.

Note that if , then and . We then observe

Obviously, , which in turn together (1) and (2) yields the conclusion

Define and .

Then, system (10) can be rewritten aswhere

Theorem 1. Under Assumption 1 and Assumption 2, system (1) can reach the multiconsensus if the parameters meet the following conditions:where , , , , , , , , and .

Proof. It follows from (12) thatDefinite the Lyapunov function for system (12):where and .
In view of (8), we know that Lyapunov function (15) satisfies and if and only if .For , the time derivative of along the trajectories of system (11) givesThen, by (A1), we getIt follows from (17) and (18) thatwhere In view of condition (12), we can get . It is known that Lyapunov function satisfies thatThus, one haswhere .
For , taking the time derivative of along the trajectories of system (11)where and .
Then, by the above differential inequality (21) and (22), we have the following results:(1)For , and (2)For , and (3), , and (4) and Thus, one has
For ,For ,If , then defining . Let , and from the above analysis, we can draw the following conclusions:Therefore, the multiconsensus can be achieved. The proof is completed.

Remark 1. Under the condition of Theorem 1, the multiconsensus of system (1) can be achieved globally exponentially with the presented law.

Remark 2. When each agent has the identical nonlinear function, all the agents have the same virtual leader. The dynamics of the virtual leader can be described asUnder the intermittent control, system (1) can reach consensus.

Theorem 2. Under Assumption 1 and Assumption 2, system (1) can reach the multiconsensus if the parameter meets the following conditions:where , , , , , , and .
When , the dynamics of the th agent can be described as follows:Then, (28) shows that the velocity of virtual leader is constant. Under protocol (8), let , then the closed-loop system (28) becomes:where . System (29) can be rewritten asThe proof of this part is similar to that of Theorem 1, which is omitted here.

4. Numerical Simulations

In this part, the effectiveness of presented theoretical results has been proven by numerical examples. The multiconsensus of second-order agent systems has been studied. Actually, seven agents can form a second-order system which is split into two clusters and . If , then ; and if , then .

The Laplacian matrix is given as follows:

Case 1. Set and . By Assumption 2, , and . Then, . In view of condition (12), we can choose . By condition (13), we choose . The initial position and velocity of the virtual leader are given as follows:Figure 1 shows the states and velocity of the virtual leaders and followers. It is easy to see that the multiconsensus of systems (1) can be received. The error tracks of the agents are depicted in Figure 2.

When , as shown in Figure 3, the consensus problem of system (1) is indeed solved.

Case 2. Let and . The initial velocity of the virtual leader are given as follows: and . The multiconsensus of the systems can be achieved. As a special case, when the initial velocity of the virtual leader is same, the system reaches consensus. The simulation result is shown in Figures 4 and 5, which show that the multiconsensus can be achieved.

5. Conclusion

In this paper, we have studied on multiconsensus of second-order multiagent systems with nonlinear dynamics. For the realization of multiconsensus, a distributed protocol based on intermittent relative information has been proposed. Some of sufficient conditions have been given to ensure that the states of all agents could reach more consistent values. In this paper, two simulation examples are given and applied to the effectiveness of theoretical results.

Data Availability

All data included in this study are available upon request by contact with the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.


This work was supported in part by the Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province (2016CFB514) and the Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Hubei University of Technology (nos. BSQD2015044, BSQD2015024, BSQD2019050).


  1. X.-W. Jiang, X.-Y. Chen, T.-W. Huang, and H.-C. Yan, “Output tracking control of single-input multi-output systems over an erasure channel,” IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, pp. 1–9, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. H. Su, H. Wu, and J. Lam, “Positive edge-consensus for nodal networks via output feedback,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 1244–1249, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. J.-W. Sun, G.-Y. Han, Z. Zeng, and Y.-F. Wang, “Memristor-based neural network circuit of full-function pavlov associative memory with time delay and variable learning rate,” IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, pp. 1–11, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. J. Sun, Y. Wu, G. Cui, and Y. Wang, “Finite-time real combination synchronization of three complex-variable chaotic systems with unknown parameters via sliding mode control,” Nonlinear Dynamics, vol. 88, no. 3, pp. 1677–1690, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. G.-H. Xu, F. Qi, Q. Lai, and H. Ho-Ching Iu, “Fixed time synchronization control for bilateral teleoperation mobile manipulator with nonholonomic constraint and time delay,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II: Express Briefs, p. 1, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. J. Yu and L. Wang, “Group consensus in multi-agent systems with switching topologies and communication delays,” Systems & Control Letters, vol. 59, no. 6, pp. 340–348, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. J. Yu and L. Wang, “Group consensus of multi-agent systems with directed information exchange,” International Journal of Systems Science, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 334–348, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. S. Monaco and L. Ricciardi Celsi, “On multi-consensus and almost equitable graph partitions,” Automatica, vol. 103, pp. 53–61, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. Y. Feng, S. Xu, and B. Zhang, “Group consensus control for double-integrator dynamic multiagent systems with fixed communication topology,” International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 532–547, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. X.-Q. Lu, A. Francis, and S.-H. Chen, “Cluster consensus of nonlinearly coupled multi-agent systems in directed graphs,” Chinese Physics Letters, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 1089–1095, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  11. X.-Q. Lu, F. Austin, and S.-H. Chen, “Cluster consensus of second-order multi-agent systems via pinning control,” Chinese Physics B, vol. 19, no. 12, Article ID 120506, pp. 1–7, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. X. Liao and L. Ji, “On pinning group consensus for dynamical multi-agent networks with general connected topology,” Neurocomputing, vol. 135, pp. 262–267, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. H. Zhao and J. H. Park, “Group consensus of discrete-time multi-agent systems with fixed and stochastic switching topologies,” Nonlinear Dynamics, vol. 77, no. 4, pp. 1297–1307, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  14. J. Qin and C. Yu, “Cluster consensus control of generic linear multi-agent systems under directed topology with acyclic partition,” Automatica, vol. 49, no. 9, pp. 2898–2905, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. G. Wang and Y. Shen, “Second-order cluster consensus of multi-agent dynamical systems with impulsive effects,” Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, vol. 19, no. 9, pp. 3220–3228, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. G. Wen, Z. Li, Z. Duan, and G. Chen, “Distributed consensus control for linear multi-agent systems with discontinuous observations,” International Journal of Control, vol. 86, no. 1, pp. 95–106, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. L. Xiao and X. Liao, “Periodic intermittent consensus of second-order agents networks with nonlinear dynamics,” International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 23–28, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. Y. Gao and L. Wang, “Consensus of multiple double-integrator agents with intermittent measurement,” International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, vol. 20, pp. 1140–1155, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  19. G. Wen, Z. Duan, W. Yu, and G. Chen, “Consensus of second-order multi-agent systems with delayed nonlinear dynamics and intermittent communications,” International Journal of Control, vol. 86, no. 2, pp. 322–331, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. A. Hu, J. Cao, and M. Hu, “Consensus of leader-following multi-agent systems in time-varying networks via intermittent control,” International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 969–976, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. G.-H. Xu, M. Xu, M.-F. Ge, T.-F. Ding, F. Qi, and M. Li, “Distributed event-based control of hierarchical leader-follower networks with time-varying layer-to-layer delays,” Energies, vol. 13, no. 7, p. 1808, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. Z. Peng, D. Wang, G. Sun, and H. Wang, “Distributed cooperative stabilisation of continuous-time uncertain nonlinear multi-agent systems,” International Journal of Systems Science, vol. 45, no. 10, pp. 2031–2041, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. H. Su, G. Jia, and M. Z. Q. Chen, “Semi-global containment control of multi-agent systems with intermittent input saturation,” Journal of The Franklin Institute, vol. 352, no. 9, pp. 3504–3525, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. G. Wen, Z. Peng, A. Rahmani, and Y. Yu, “Distributed leader-following consensus for second-order multi-agent systems with nonlinear inherent dynamics,” International Journal of Systems Science, vol. 45, no. 9, pp. 1892–1901, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2020 Jie Chen et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.