Research Article
Application of Multiattribute Decision-Making for Evaluating Regional Innovation Capacity
Table 4
Consistency test results for the 20 direct influence matrices.
| Number of matrices | No. 1 | No. 2 | No. 3 | No. 4 | No. 5 | No. 6 | No. 7 | No. 8 | No. 9 | No. 10 | No. 11 | No. 12 | No. 13 | No. 14 | No. 15 | No. 16 | No. 17 | No. 18 | No. 19 | No. 20 | Average |
| P | 0.07345 | 0.062409 | 0.043803 | 0.037418 | 0.038652 | 0.036685 | 0.031286 | 0.031428 | 0.032798 | 0.031113 | 0.031761 | 0.027984 | 0.027597 | 0.027436 | 0.027384 | 0.027191 | 0.028 | 0.027765 | 0.029973 | 0.031675 | 0.03529 | p (%) | 7.345 | 6.241 | 4.38 | 3.742 | 3.865 | 3.668 | 3.129 | 3.143 | 3.28 | 3.111 | 3.176 | 2.798 | 2.76 | 2.744 | 2.738 | 2.719 | 2.8 | 2.777 | 2.997 | 3.167 | 3.529 |
|
|
, where represents the elements of the average influence strength matrix derived from k direct influence strength matrices. |