Research Article
Application of Multiattribute Decision-Making for Evaluating Regional Innovation Capacity
Table 6
Regional innovation capacity evaluation attributes of centrality and causality.
| Evaluation attribute | C1 | C2 | C3 | C4 | C5 | C6 | C7 | C8 | C9 | C10 | C11 | C12 | C13 | C14 | C15 | C16 | C17 | C18 | C19 | C20 | C21 | C22 | C23 | C24 |
| Degree of influence | 1.535 | 1.355 | 1.6 | 2.052 | 2.036 | 2.062 | 1.621 | 1.649 | 1.447 | 1.616 | 1.557 | 1.614 | 1.685 | 1.67 | 1.443 | 1.805 | 1.567 | 1.553 | 1.531 | 1.544 | 1.734 | 1.475 | 1.503 | 1.658 | Degree of being influenced | 1.106 | 1.009 | 0.461 | 2.236 | 2.776 | 1.665 | 2.236 | 2.515 | 1.625 | 1.07 | 0.807 | 2.07 | 2.309 | 2.075 | 1.949 | 2.15 | 1.255 | 1.967 | 0.665 | 1.443 | 1.361 | 1.263 | 1.272 | 2.026 | Centrality degree | 2.641 | 2.364 | 2.062 | 4.287 | 4.811 | 3.726 | 3.858 | 4.164 | 3.072 | 2.687 | 2.364 | 3.683 | 3.994 | 3.746 | 3.393 | 3.955 | 2.823 | 3.52 | 2.196 | 2.987 | 3.095 | 2.738 | 2.775 | 3.684 | Ranking | 20 | 22 | 24 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 6 | 3 | 14 | 19 | 21 | 10 | 4 | 7 | 12 | 5 | 16 | 11 | 23 | 15 | 13 | 18 | 17 | 9 | Causality degree | 0.43 | 0.346 | 1.139 | −0.184 | −0.74 | 0.397 | −0.615 | −0.866 | −0.178 | 0.546 | 0.75 | −0.456 | −0.624 | −0.405 | −0.506 | −0.345 | 0.312 | −0.414 | 0.865 | 0.101 | 0.373 | 0.212 | 0.231 | −0.368 | Group | Cause | Cause | Cause | Result | Result | Cause | Result | Result | Result | Cause | Cause | Result | Result | Result | Result | Result | Cause | Result | Cause | Cause | Cause | Cause | Cause | Result |
|
|