#### Abstract

This paper deals with spatial patterns of a predator-prey crossdiffusion model with cannibalism. By applying the asymptotic analysis and Rabinowitz bifurcation theorem, we consider the local structure of steady state to the model and determine an explicit formula of the nonconstant steady state. Furthermore, the criteria of the stability/instability for the steady state with small amplitude are established.

#### 1. Introduction

Multicomponent system is widely existed in nature and engineering apllications, for instance, in combustion, chemical reactors, tumor growth, gas mixtures, and animal crowds. On the diffusive level, these systems can be described by crossdiffusion equations taking into account multicomponent diffusion and reaction [1]. Specifically, crossdiffusion is a phenomenon in which the concentration gradient of one species induces a flux of the other species. The possibility of crossdiffusion terms in multicomponent systems was proposed by Onsager and Fuoss [2], while Baldwin et al. [3] undertook the experimental verification of the existence of crossdiffusion and also observed that the crossdiffusion coefficients can be quite significant. Since then, various crossdiffusion mathematical models have been suggested to interpret and predict many interesting features of natural multicomponent dynamics [4–10].

For example, Darcy’s law implies that the velocity is proportional to the negative pressure gradient, and the pressure is defined by a state equation imposed by the volume extension of the mixture. Druet and Jungel [9] considered the convective transport in a multicomponent isothermal compressible fluid subject to the mass continuity equations. According to the idea that decomposes the system into a porous-medium-type equation for the volume extension and transport equations for the modified number fractions, they proved the global-in-time existence of classical and weak solutions in a bounded domain with no-penetration boundary conditions. Jungel and Ptashnyk [10] considered crossdiffusion systems defined in a heterogeneous medium, where the heterogeneity is reflected in spatially periodic diffusion coefficients or by the perforated domain. By combining two-scale convergence and the boundedness-by-entropy method, they proved two-scale homogenization limits of parabolic crossdiffusion systems in a heterogeneous medium with no-flux boundary conditions. Practical applications of such approach would investigate the problem of reducing a heterogeneous material to a homogeneous, specifically, predicting the response of refractory concrete to high-temperature exposure in steel furnaces. In nature, the impact of heat and mass transfer processes become particularly evident at high temperatures, where the increased pressure in pores, large temperature gradients, and temperature-induced creep may lead to catastrophic service failures [11]. Benes et al. [12] discussed a nonlinear numerical scheme arising from the implicit time discretization of the Bazant–Thonguthai model (with crossdiffusion) for hygrothermal behavior of concrete at high temperatures. By theoretical analysis and numerical simulation, they found that the model reproduces well the rapid increase of pore pressure in wet concrete due to extreme heating. In particular, there are three different zones which can be predicted: one corresponds to elements failed due to spalling damage, the other one indicates the part of the structure in which the local strength is sufficiently high to sustain the pore pressure, but its stability is lost due the explosive spalling of the former region, and the last one shows the portion of the cross-section is still capable of transmitting stresses due to mechanical loading, which is thereby responsible for the structural safety during fire. This phenomenon is particularly meaningful for the safety assessment of concrete structures prone to thermally induced spalling.

In fact, the rapid growth of the field of system biology has further contributed to interest in reaction-diffusion systems. Nowadays, crossdiffusion terms, which are inspired by the model, proposed by Shigesada et al. [13] in 1979 when they have studied the segregation of competing species, also have attracted wide attentions used in reaction-diffusion equations encountered in models from mathematical biology [14–21]. As we all know, the growth of biological population depends not only on time but also on spatial distribution. Spatial species interaction includes the self-diffusion and crossdiffusion. In this paper, we investigate a predator-prey system with both cannibalism and crossdiffusion in the formwhere are the biomass of an adult predator, a juvenile predator, and prey at time *t*. are positive constants. denotes the cannibalism rate. The positive constants are diffusion coefficients, and is the crossdiffusion coefficient. The initial values are nonnegative smooth functions which are not identically zero. is a bounded domain with smooth boundary , and is the outward unit normal vector of the boundary . The homogeneous Neumann boundary condition indicates that this system is self-contained with zero population flux across the boundary. For more details on the backgrounds of crossdiffusion models, one can see [21, 22].

The corresponding kinetic system of (1) was introduced by Magnsson in [23]. In this ODE system, Magnusson found that cannibalism, which is used as a means of population control to prevent them from overbreeding [21–31], has a destabilizing effect. When the large prey carries capacity, the juvenile mortality rate is high and adult recruitment rate is low, and stability of the equilibrium will be lost through Hopf bifurcation, the appearance of which is caused by the increasing level of cannibalism. And sustained oscillations can set in for sufficiently high levels of cannibalism. After, Kaewmanee and Tang [32] optimized the results of Magnusson, they obtained that stability of the equilibrium is lost due to the increase of the cannibalism attack rate past a bifurcation point that depends on other parameters. Later, the stability, topological properties, and types of bifurcations of the ODE system have been studied more explicitly by Marlk and Pribylova [33]. The authors proved that both subcritical and supercritical bifurcations may take place and hence the limits’ cycle enclosing the stationary point does not need to be stable. Very recently, Zhang et al. [28] analyzed the effect of cannibalism and illustrated that the cannibalization rate can cause the local stability of the equilibrium changes from stable to unstable to stable, or from unstable to stable to unstable. Moreover, the positive equilibrium must be globally asymptotically stable if the cannibalization rate is large enough. They also obtained that supercritical/subcritical Hopf bifurcation can occur with the rates of two factors (the cannibalization and the benefit from cannibalism) as bifurcation parameters.

Recently, Fu and Yang [34] considered the corresponding pure diffusion system of (1) () and proved that the positive equilibrium in this system has the same stability properties when it is regarded as equilibrium of the ODE system. It is shown that the decisive factor of destabilization for semilinear reaction-diffusion system is still cannibalism. Therefore, they further discussed the following strongly coupled crossdiffusion system (1).

Obviously, if andthen (1) has the unique positive equilibrium point , where , , and . By the linearization analysis, Fu and Yang proved that positive equilibrium can undergo stability switch from stable in the ODE system and semilinear system to unstable in the crossdiffusion system if is sufficiently large. This means that the decisive factor of destabilization for the positive equilibrium point in (1) is the crossdiffusion rate, and cannibalism is an auxiliary destabilizing force. Besides, by using the Leray–Schauder degree theory, they also obtained the existence of nonconstant positive steady states. For completeness, we introduce this existence result, which can be proved by similar arguments as Theorem 5 in [21].

Theorem 1. *(see [34]). Let , and be fixed positive constants such that , , , and hold. If and the sum is odd, then there exists a positive constant such that the steady state problem corresponding to (1) has at least one nonconstant positive solution for . Here, let and be the eigenvalues of the operator on with the homogeneous Neumann boundary condition.*

Our main purpose in this paper is to describe in detail the local structure of the nonconstant steady states and discuss the stability and instability of bifurcation steady states.

The rest of the paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, the local bifurcation analysis is performed to examine the structure of bifurcating steady states. Furthermore, the stability and instability of bifurcating steady states with small amplitude will be given in Section 3; meanwhile, the paper ends with a brief discussion.

#### 2. Local Structure and Formula of Steady State Bifurcation

The existence of nonconstant steady state of system (1) is established under the condition that and the sum is odd in [34]. In this section, using the asymptotic analysis and bifurcation theory similar to those in [35–38], we choose as a bifurcation parameter and fix the rest of the parameter to explore the local structure of nonconstant steady states of (1) bifurcating from the constant steady state in one dimension.

Before proceeding, we present some properties about the negative Laplace operator. Let be the eigenvalues of the operator on with the homogeneous Neumann boundary condition, and let be the eigenspace corresponding to in . Let be the closure of in , be an orthonormal basis of , and . Then,

In particular, for , it is well known that the problemhas a sequence of simple eigenvalueswhose corresponding eigenfunctions are given by

This set of eigenfunctions is an orthogonal basis in . For later use, we now define a Banach space byequipped with usual norm, and a Hilbert space with the inner productfor .

For the sake of simplify, we investigate the structure of nonconstant positive steady state of (1) in one-dimensional interval , i.e., consider the associated elliptic problem:

Define the map as

Then, is a solution of (10), equivalent to it is a zero-point of the map . Clearly,

Notice that

Assume

For nonconstant solution of (10) bifurcating from with small amplitude, letwhere . Substituting (14) and (15) into (10) and equating the and terms, respectively, we derive two systemswhere

It is easy to get nonzero solutions for (unique up to a constant multiple for any given positive integer , and this constant can be absorbed into in (15)) for (17) asas long as is given by

It is clearly known that if

Here, in order to get the uniqueness of solution, we need assume that for any integer .

Setfor a positive integer . Since is regarded as the bifurcation parameter, , is called the possible bifurcation location for the formation of new patterns [38]. This means that the first bifurcation occurs when the parameter crosses the bifurcation value . If the bifurcation is stable, it will be the pattern with formulae given in (15) and (20).

In the following, we find the formula of . The adjoint system of the homogeneous system associated with (18) iswhich has one solutionwhere is defined as in (6) for . By the solvable condition for (18), that is, the vectors and should be orthogonal in , we have the solvability equation for as follows:

A direct computation gives

When , for each , in (19) can be simplified to

From this, a particular solution can be found aswhere

Since , it is necessary for further analysis to obtain . Following the process of getting (17) and (18), further computation up to the order and equating the term yieldswhere

The solvability condition can be simplified as

Substituting (32) into (33) leads to

According to the above computation and bifurcation theorem [38], the local bifurcation of (10) is given as follows.

Theorem 2. *If for any positive integer , , then is a bifurcation value of the equation with respect to the curve . Moreover, there is a one-parameter family of nontrivial solutions of (10) for sufficiently small, where , and are continuous functions such that and*

The zero-point set of constitutes two curves and in a neighborhood of the bifurcation point .

To clarify the relationship between the solution and its bifurcation location , we may relabel as , i.e.,

As specified in [27], is called the term of the pattern, and the pattern shape and its amplitude are primarily determined by the term when is small.

#### 3. Stability of Steady State Bifurcation

This section is devoted to study the stability of the pattern solution bifurcated from by analyzing the sign of the principal eigenvalue.

For (10), set

Then,where

Settingand substituting them into (38), we can obtain a system by equating the termswhere

It is obvious that the sign of determines the stability of the stationary solution . To solve the eigenvalue problem (42), we can use to replace for some integer . As to the existence of nonzero solution , we havewhereand is given by (21).

It follows from the Routh–Hurwitz stability criteria that all the eigenvalues have negative real part ( is locally asymptotically stable) if and only if for all . Hence, there exist some eigenvalues with positive real parts if one of the conditions above fails for some .

We set for a positive integer which is called the . This means that the first bifurcation will occur when the parameter crosses the bifurcation value . Hence, if and there exists an integer such that . As such, equation (44) at least has a root with positive real part. Therefore, a necessary condition for the stability of is stated as below.

Theorem 3. *(stability criterion). If , then and the steady state in (15) is unstable. In other words, if is stable, then .*

Now, we determine the stability of the steady state . When , we have . Obviously, the principal eigenvalue for (42) is with eigenvector:

In order to obtain the stability of , we need to evaluate and . Again substituting (40) and (41) into (38) and equating the terms, we havewhere

The solvability condition for equation (47) giveswhere is given in (24) with . Therefore,where

A simple calculation gives

Thus, . For this reason, we need further to compute . Since can be expressed asand we can find a particular solution of (51) aswherewith , as defined in (30). A further similar computation by equating the term gives the following system:where