Research Article
Research on Utility Evaluation of Grid Investment considering Risk Preference of Decision-Makers
Table 5
Index system optimization results.
| Second layer | Third layer | A | B | C | D | E | F |
| Economic benefits | New investment included in fixed assets ratio | 0.500 | 0.000 | 1.000 | 0.773 | 0.636 | 0.409 | Asset utilization efficiency | 0.700 | 0.000 | 0.800 | 0.400 | 1.000 | 0.400 | Unit asset pricing depreciation fee | 0.600 | 1.000 | 0.400 | 0.200 | 0.000 | 0.800 |
| Social benefit | Investment power growth ratio | 1.000 | 0.143 | 0.000 | 0.571 | 0.429 | 0.071 | User reliability | 0.000 | 0.750 | 1.000 | 0.875 | 0.500 | 0.125 |
| Environmental benefits | CO2 emission reduction rate | 0.000 | 0.222 | 0.667 | 1.000 | 0.444 | 0.333 | Proportion of clean energy power generation capacity | 0.167 | 1.000 | 0.500 | 0.667 | 0.667 | 0.000 |
| Technical benefits | Qualified rate of voltage | 0.000 | 0.833 | 0.417 | 0.917 | 1.000 | 0.833 | Node voltage ratio | 0.778 | 0.250 | 0.000 | 1.000 | 0.278 | 0.639 | Network coordination | 0.667 | 0.364 | 1.000 | 0.303 | 0.424 | 0.000 |
|
|