Research and Application of Critical Failure Paths Identification Method for Dam Risk Analysis

Table 2

Weight results of the second-level index of the Guandi dam.

Decision-makers	Consistency	Difference	Credibility	Interval weight
				DM1	0.2033	0.1918	0.2053	(0.5830, 0.5901)	(0.1738, 0.1750)	(0.1918, 0.2130)	(0.0404, 0.0413)
DM2	0.2035	0.1732	0.2102	(0.5379, 0.5991)	(0.1488, 0.1575)	(0.2454, 0.2791)	(0.0506, 0.0512)
DM3	0.2006	0.2002	0.2005	(0.5306, 0.5193)	(0.1165, 0.1480)	(0.2850, 0.3422)	(0.0407, 0.0416)
DM4	0.1990	0.2335	0.1907	(0.4959, 0.5058)	(0.1029, 0.1099)	(0.3527, 0.3806)	(0.0314, 0.0323)
DM5	0.1936	0.2013	0.1933	(0.6195, 0.6305)	(0.1909, 0.2378)	(0.1291, 0.1316)	(0.0375, 0.0381)
CDB-IAHP				(0.5480, 0.5590)	(0.1468, 0.1656)	(0.2403, 0.2690)	(0.0403, 0.0411)
Subjective weight				0.5487	0.1726	0.2909	0.0402
Objective weight				0.2500	0.2500	0.2499	0.2501
Final weight				0.5214	0.1640	0.2764	0.0382