Research and Application of Critical Failure Paths Identification Method for Dam Risk Analysis

Table 6

Weight results of the second-level index of the Pubugou dam.

Decision-makers	Consistency	Difference	Credibility	Interval weight
				e1	e2	e3	e4
DM1	0.2005	0.1945	0.2018	(0.5684, 0.5916)	(0.1671, 0.1675)	(0.1990, 0.2110)	(0.0402, 0.0409)
DM2	0.2000	0.1872	0.2031	(0.5868, 0.5898)	(0.2036, 0.2085)	(0.1637, 0.1643)	(0.0416, 0.0422)
DM3	0.2021	0.1898	0.2046	(0.5594, 0.5622)	(0.1878, 0.1891)	(0.2113, 0.2153)	(0.0405, 0.0412)
DM4	0.2022	0.2011	0.2019	(0.5657, 0.5704)	(0.1300, 0.1311)	(0.2622, 0.2699)	(0.0353, 0.0361)
DM5	0.1953	0.2274	0.1886	(0.4676, 0.4712)	(0.1122, 0.1146)	(0.3826, 0.3857)	(0.0329, 0.0338)
CDB-IAHP				(0.5544, 0.5582)	(0.1609, 0.1630)	(0.2417, 0.2472)	(0.0382, 0.0389)
Subjective weight				0.5585	0.1729	0.2409	0.0381
Objective weight				0.2500	0.2500	0.2499	0.2501
Final weight				0.5528	0.1711	0.2383	0.0378