Research Article

Simulation of a Submarine Landslide Using the Coupled Material Point Method

Table 3

Orthogonal experiment table.

SchemeInfluential factorsSliding distance (m)Maximum velocity (m/s)
InitialporosityYoung’s modulus (kPa)Buoyant density (kg/m3)Friction coefficientCohesion (kPa)Slope angle (°)

10.232250393.750.03811.2510.31539.012.2
20.232625459.380.04413.1312.03472.613.1
30.2330005250.0521513.75420.314.52
40.233375590.630.05616.8815.47424.514.9
50.233750656.250.06218.7517.19434.015.6
60.262250459.380.05216.8817.19528.316.2
70.2626255250.05618.7510.31272.59.8
80.263000590.30.06211.2512.03283.711.9
90.263375656.250.03813.1313.75737.915.3
100.263750393.750.0441515.47563.116.0
110.322505250.06213.1315.47370.414.1
120.32625590.630.0381517.19929.817.5
130.33000656.250.04416.8810.31402.811.2
140.33375393.750.05218.7512.03355.012.2
150.33750459.380.05611.2513.75375.114.7
160.342250590.630.04418.7513.75561.514.3
170.342625656.250.05211.2515.47500.715.2
180.343000393.750.05613.1317.19477.716.2
190.343375459.380.0621510.31232.89.3
200.3437505250.03816.8812.03602.613.5
210.382250656.250.0561512.03328.211.7
220.382625393.750.06216.8813.75326.714.2
230.383000459.380.03818.7515.47727.715.85
240.3833755250.04411.2517.19712.917.2
250.383750590.630.05213.1310.31304.510.3