Research Article
Exploring Further Advantages in an Alternative Formulation for the Set Covering Problem
Table 6
RPD metrics for each instance group and algorithm in both studies.
| Instance group | | | | d-ACO (%) | n-ACO (%) | ipv | d-ACO (%) | n-ACO (%) | ipv | d-ACO (%) | n-ACO (%) | ipv |
| First study | A | 0.43 | 0.08 | 81.80 | 0.08 | 0.03 | 63.83 | 0.79 | 0.43 | 46.03 | B | 0.53 | 0.28 | 46.60 | 0.36 | 0.17 | 51.89 | 0.62 | 0.39 | 37.24 | C | 1.86 | 1.74 | 6.54 | 1.22 | 1.17 | 3.74 | 2.49 | 1.89 | 24.06 | ALL | 0.94 | 0.70 | 25.69 | 0.55 | 0.46 | 17.20 | 1.30 | 0.90 | 30.60 |
| Second study | Instance group | | | | d-ABC (%) | n-ABC (%) | ipv | d-ABC (%) | n-ABC (%) | ipv | d-ABC (%) | n-ABC (%) | ipv (%) |
| A | 0.38 | 0.19 | 51.25 | 0.16 | 0.07 | 56.65 | 0.66 | 0.30 | 54.25 | B | 0.74 | 0.19 | 74.56 | 0.50 | 0.09 | 82.81 | 1.11 | 0.29 | 73.77 | C | 10.71 | 1.07 | 90.01 | 9.91 | 0.90 | 90.95 | 12.75 | 1.48 | 88.39 | ALL | 3.94 | 0.48 | 87.80 | 3.52 | 0.35 | 90.04 | 4.84 | 0.69 | 85.73 |
|
|