Abstract

In this paper, we discuss the exact regional controllability of fractional evolution equations involving Riemann–Liouville fractional derivative of order . The result is obtained with the help of the theory of fractional calculus, semigroup theory, and Banach fixed-point theorem under several assumptions on the corresponding linear system and the nonlinear term. Finally, some numerical simulations are given to illustrate the obtained result.

1. Introduction

Time-fractional systems have been proved, with the development of science and technology, to be one of the most effective tools in modeling many phenomena arising in physics, engineering, and real world problems [16]. Therefore, the research studies of fractional-order calculus attract lots of attention for these kinds of systems with several fractional derivatives (for more details, see [710] and the references therein). Zhou and Jiao [11] introduced a concept of a mild solution based on Laplace transform and probability density functions; several authors presented a tremendous amount of valuable results on controllability and observability, stability analysis, and so on [1215].

Similar to the integer-order control systems [1621], the regional controllability problem of fractional systems is a class of control problems presented in many applications in real world. Regional controllability of linear and some nonlinear fractional systems is referred to in literature [2224] and the references therein. However, regional controllability of Riemann–Liouville fractional semilinear evolution equations with analytic semigroup problem is still open. Then, this paper focuses on the existence of a bounded control steering the system into a bounded desired state defined only in a subregion of the whole evolution domain. Based on Banach fixed-point theorem and some properties of fractional operators, the main result is deduced.

The rest of this paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, some definitions and preparation results are introduced. In Section 3, the regional controllability of the considered system, using theory of analytical semigroup, is established under some conditions. At last, two examples are given to illustrate our given algorithm.

2. Preliminaries and Problem Formulation

In this section, we introduce some basic definitions of fractional operators present in the considered system which will be specified later and some properties which are used further in this paper.

Definition 1. (see [7]). The left sided Riemann–Liouville fractional integral (resp. derivative) of a function at a point of order can be written asLet us consider and to be two Banach spaces; we have the following two propositions.

Proposition 1 (see [25]). Let us consider and to be strongly continuous.
Then, the convolutionexists in Bochner sense and defines a continuous function from into .

Proposition 2 (see [25]). (Young’s inequality).
Let us consider such that . If and ; then, andNow, we present the considered system. For that, let be a bounded subset of with a smooth boundary . Let us consider and denote

We consider the following semilinear fractional system involving Riemann–Liouville derivative of order :where is the infinitesimal generator of an analytic semigroup of uniformly bounded operator on the Hilbert space . Without loss of generality, let where is the resolvent set of A. Then we define the fractional power for , which is a closed linear operator. Its domain is , which is a Banach space equipped with the norm , is a nonlinear operator, and is the control operator which is linear (bounded or unbounded) from into where p is the number of actuators, is given in , and the initial state is in .

We use the following definition of mild solution for the previous problem.

Definition 2 (see [26]). For and any given , we say that a function is a mild solution of system (6) if it satisfies the following formula:wherein which is a probability density function defined in .
Moreover and have the following properties.

Proposition 3 (see [27]). For any , we have(i) such that(i) such that

Corollary 1. Let us considerThen, we have

Proof. We have ; then, . Therefore, , and by the previous proposition, we have the result.
For the rest of this paper, we denote

3. Regional Controllability

In this section, we formulate and prove conditions for the regional controllability of semilinear Riemann–Liouville fractional control systems. To do this, let be a subregion of , and we define the restriction operator in byand we denote by its adjoint.

We have the following definition.

Definition 3. The system (6) is said to be exactly (respectively, approximately) -controllable if for all (respectively, for all and for all ), there exists a control such that (respectively, ).
For the rest of this paper, we can write the mild solution as follows:and we define the restriction of the controllability operator in byConsider now the following associate linear system of equation (6):which we assume to be approximately controllable.
Next, we will study the regional controllability of the system (6) in endowed with the normwhereNow, we shall present the main result; we first define the operatorand we make the following assumptions:(i)() For arbitrary ,with satisfying .(ii).We obtain the following theorem.

Theorem 1. If the hypotheses and are satisfied, then the following assertions hold:(1)There exist , , and such that, under the assumptionfor any state in , the operator has a unique fixed point in that steers system (6) to in .(2)The mappingis a Lipschitz mapping.

Proof. (1)Let us considerUsing the limit of near , we can see that for , there exists such thatwhich gives .Let us considerWe have and the mapping such that is a Lipschitz mapping with constant . In fact,and hence .To show the Lipschitz condition of the function , we use equation (15), and Corollary 1, we have for all Therefore, by hypothesis (), we obtainand hence f is a Lipschitz mapping with constant .Now, let and consider ; we show that has a unique fixed point in .Let us consider ; we haveSince f is Lipschitz, thenFor , using inequality (15), we have , and thus is a strict contraction mapping.Let us show thatFor that, let ; then, andTherefore, for , we haveThen, ; finally, we deduce from Banach fixed-point theorem that admits a unique fixed point .A direct calculation shows us that obtained is the solution of the regional controllability problem of system (3).(2)Let us consider and in ; we haveOn the other hand,Then,Therefore, F satisfies the Lipschitz condition.

Remark 1. In the case where is unbounded, we suppose that is an admissible control operator for (see [28]), and consequently we can demonstrate the same result with a suitable .
We give the following proposition.

Proposition 4. The sequenceconverges in to .

Proof. Let us consider ; we haveFrom inequality (31), we obtainSince , .
Then, is a Cauchy sequence on , and we conclude that converges to in .
Passing to the limit in (8), we have ; therefore, because has a unique fixed point in .
Accordingly, we implement the algorithm as follows.(i)Step 1, , the actuator, the subregion , and small enough.Choose .Calculate and obtain .(ii)Step 2Repeat. Calculate and obtain .Until .

4. Numerical Simulations

In this section, we present two numerical simulations illustrating our theoretical result where the first one is given by using zonal actuator and the second example is given by using a pointwise actuator.

4.1. Zonal Actuator

Let us consider the following one-dimensional fractional system with .where and .

The subregion where we search the controllability of the considered system is and let . By using the previous algorithm, we have the following figures.

In Figure 1, we remark that with the given zonal sensor, we obtain successful results which validate the used method and the previous algorithm; indeed, the desired and estimated final states are very close in the subregion with the error which is very small. Figure 2 presents the evolution of control function which has a transfer cost equal to .

4.2. Pointwise Actuator

We consider the following system:

By applying the above algorithm for , , andwe have the following result.

In Figure 3, like the previous part, the given algorithm leads to good results; we remark that the desired state and the reached one are close in using the given pointwise actuator. In this case, the reconstruction error is very small, and it is of order . Figure 4 shows the evolution of control function depending on the time with the transfer cost .

5. Conclusion

In this paper, we have established the regional controllability for a class of Riemann–Liouville fractional semilinear control systems. The idea of applying control theory for this kind of systems is very interesting and constitutes a new issue in the applications. The presented method in this paper covers a large class of this kind of systems. We have also given an algorithm which has been implemented numerically and has very satisfactory results. In addition, the problem of regional controllability remains open for other types of fractional systems that will be the subject of future research.

Data Availability

No data were used to support this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.