Research Article
Application of Multiple Criteria Decision-Making Methods in Assignment Place Selection
Table 10
Positive and negative advantage values, PROMETHEE I and PROMETHEE II results (1st officer results).
| Ct | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ⌖+ | R | ⌖− | ⌖net | R | Pk (ai, aj) | a1 | a2 | a3 | a4 | a5 | a6 |
| a1 | 0.0000 | 0.6156 | 0.8417 | 0.6469 | 0.7508 | 0.8019 | 0.7314 | 1 | 0.1354 | 0.5960 | 1 | a2 | 0.2514 | 0.0000 | 0.6532 | 0.2537 | 0.4247 | 0.6864 | 0.4539 | 3 | 0.3975 | 0.0563 | 3 | a3 | 0.1224 | 0.3029 | 0.0000 | 0.3210 | 0.1911 | 0.4682 | 0.2811 | 5 | 0.6577 | −0.3766 | 6 | a4 | 0.1155 | 0.5306 | 0.6385 | 0.0000 | 0.3644 | 0.5933 | 0.4484 | 4 | 0.4202 | 0.0282 | 4 | a5 | 0.1111 | 0.3964 | 0.7341 | 0.5493 | 0.0000 | 0.5219 | 0.4626 | 2 | 0.3969 | 0.0656 | 2 | a6 | 0.0765 | 0.1421 | 0.4212 | 0.3301 | 0.2537 | 0.0000 | 0.2447 | 6 | 0.6143 | −0.3696 | 5 | ⌖− | 0.1354 | 0.3975 | 0.6577 | 0.4202 | 0.3969 | 0.6143 | | | | | | R | 1 | 3 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 5 | | | | | |
|
|