Research Article
Application of Multiple Criteria Decision-Making Methods in Assignment Place Selection
Table 9
Normalized decision matrix (1st officer results).
| | | Max | Max | Max | Min | Max | Min | Max | Max | Max | Max | Max | | V type | V type | V type | V type | V type | V type | V type | V type | V type | V type | V type |
| | w | 0.075 | 0.076 | 0.063 | 0.069 | 0.066 | 0.051 | 0.063 | 0.058 | 0.057 | 0.234 | 0.188 | | | SC11 | SC12 | SC13 | SC21 | SC22 | SC23 | SC31 | SC32 | SC33 | C4 | C5 | | Bingöl | 1.00 | 0.36 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 0.66 | 0.33 | 1.00 | 0.60 | 1.00 | 0.98 | | Bitlis Tatvan | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.11 | 0.29 | 0.15 | 0.01 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.36 | 0.53 | 1.00 | | Kars Sarıkamış | 0.00 | 0.18 | 0.00 | 0.52 | 1.00 | 0.42 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.36 | 0.47 | | Mardin | 1.00 | 0.49 | 0.33 | 0.82 | 0.04 | 0.32 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.60 | 0.68 | 0.00 | | Şanlıurfa Siverek | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.22 | 0.22 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.33 | 1.00 | 0.33 | 0.76 | 0.67 | | Van Erciş | 0.00 | 0.73 | 0.11 | 0.00 | 0.25 | 0.00 | 0.33 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.93 | | p | 0.25 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.01 | 0.5 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.2 | 0.03 | 0.02 | | f = p-q | 0.25 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.01 | 0.5 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.2 | 0.03 | 0.02 | | min | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | | Max | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
|
|
