An Evolutionary Game Model to Study Manufacturers and Logistics Companies’ Behavior Strategies for Information Transparency in Cold Chains

Table 1

Studies in logistics information transparency.

Study	Issue	Stakeholders	Method
[9]	Information integration and profitability	Manufacturers, retailers	Conceptual model
[10]	Information sharing, supply uncertainty, and demand volatility	Manufacturer, retailers	Simulation
[11]	Role of information sharing in SCE	Vendors, retailers	Case study
[12]	Information flows in SCEs	Buyers, suppliers	Data analysis
[13]	RFID investment	SCE	Survey
[14]	RFID-enabled business intelligence	Manufacturers, distributors	IS
[15]	Information sharing and investment in procurement	Suppliers, buyers	Game model
[8]	RFID information sharing and exchanging	Governments, enterprises	IS
[16]	RFID investment risk and gain reallocation	SCE	Risk assessment
[17]	Information sharing, environmental and economic benefits	Manufacturers, suppliers	Inventory model
[18]	Information linkages with retailers	Multinational companies and retailers	Case study
[19]	Information sharing of VMI	TPL, its customer	Inventory model
[20]	Information sharing and safety traceability	Producers, distributors, and ordinary users	IS
[6]	Blockchain and information sharing	Manufacturer, supplier, and logistics service integrator	Stackelberg game
[21]	Food traceability	Farmers, traders, and consumers	Case study

Note. IS = information system; RFID = radio frequency identification; SCE = supply chain enterprises; TPL = third-party logistics.