Research Article
A Combined Upper-Sided Synthetic S2 Chart for Monitoring the Process Variance
Table 2
Comparisons of the combined upper-sided synthetic
S2 chart and the standard upper-sided synthetic
S2 chart when
.
| | | | | | | | | |
| 5 | 1.2 | 18 | 3.2262 | 5.8 | 33.88 | 21 | 3.2510 | 34.22 | 1.4 | 9 | 3.0659 | 5.4 | 9.49 | 11 | 3.0868 | 9.76 | 1.6 | 6 | 2.9857 | 5.1 | 4.72 | 7 | 2.9678 | 4.99 | 1.8 | 4 | 2.9091 | 4.9 | 3.09 | 6 | 2.9266 | 3.37 | 2.0 | 3 | 2.8856 | 4.7 | 2.33 | 4 | 2.8166 | 2.64 | 2.2 | 2 | 2.8189 | 4.6 | 1.92 | 4 | 2.8166 | 2.25 | 2.4 | 2 | 2.8810 | 4.5 | 1.67 | 3 | 2.7373 | 2.03 | 2.6 | 2 | 2.9800 | 4.4 | 1.50 | 3 | 2.7373 | 1.88 | 2.8 | 1 | 2.7958 | 4.4 | 1.38 | 3 | 2.7373 | 1.78 | 3.0 | 1 | 3.0078 | 4.3 | 1.30 | 3 | 2.7373 | 1.72 |
| 10 | 1.2 | 12 | 2.3007 | 3.7 | 17.78 | 13 | 2.3040 | 17.97 | 1.4 | 5 | 2.1917 | 3.4 | 4.62 | 6 | 2.1919 | 4.80 | 1.6 | 3 | 2.1501 | 3.2 | 2.43 | 4 | 2.1308 | 2.66 | 1.8 | 2 | 2.1262 | 3.1 | 1.72 | 3 | 2.0865 | 2.01 | 2.0 | 1 | 2.0982 | 3.0 | 1.40 | 3 | 2.0865 | 1.75 | 2.2 | 1 | 2.0982 | 3.0 | 1.24 | 2 | 2.0229 | 1.63 | 2.4 | 1 | 2.0982 | 3.0 | 1.14 | 2 | 2.0229 | 1.57 | 2.6 | 1 | 2.4892 | 2.9 | 1.08 | 2 | 2.0229 | 1.54 | 2.8 | 1 | 2.4892 | 2.9 | 1.05 | 2 | 2.0229 | 1.52 | 3.0 | 1 | 2.4892 | 2.9 | 1.03 | 2 | 2.0229 | 1.51 |
|
|