Research Article

Role of Technology in Sustainable Gambling: Policy Effects of Electronic Card System and Limit Setting

Table 2

Comparison between mandatory-type and autonomous-type venues in cycle betting.

CategoryTypesAnalysis of difference
MandatoryAutonomoust-valueSignificance level

% of cash/cards among total number of tickets issuedCash87.3973.74−13.1910.000
Electronic cards12.6126.2613.1910.000

% of cash/cards among total revenueCash91.6587.88−5.8790.000
Electronic cards8.3512.125.8790.000

Avg. betting per ticket issued (KRW)Cash21,59430,43632.0210.000
Electronic cards13,65311,675−5.1430.000

Avg. betting per person (KRW)Cash278,532372,06510.8980.000
Electronic cards25,48851,5998.7690.000

Avg. number of tickets issued per personCash12.8912.23−2.1400.019
Electronic cards1.864.4110.7960.000

% of each betting range among total number of tickets issuedCash≤ KRW 30,00072.9268.04−6.9160.000
> KRW 30,000
≤ KRW 50,000
27.0812.27−23.2200.000
> KRW 50,000
≤ KRW 70,000
0.003.4159.0640.000
> KRW 70,0000.0016.2864.4510.000
Electronic cards≤ KRW 30,00090.8391.891.9540.029
> KRW 30,000
≤ KRW 50,000
4.895.441.5700.063
> KRW 50,000
≤ KRW 70,000
1.050.92−2.3020.014
> KRW 70,0003.231.75-4.4890.000