Research Article
Defect Contour Detection of Complex Structural Chips
Table 1
Comparison of assessment results.
| Illumination situation | Method | Machine assessment | Artificial assessment | Total | Accuracy rate (%) | Precision rate (%) | Qualified | Unqualified | Uncertain |
| Normal | Ours | Qualified | 19 | 0 | 0 | 110 | 97.27 | 100.00 | Unqualified | 0 | 82 | 2 | Uncertain | 1 | 0 | 6 | YOLO v4 | Qualified | 19 | 9 | 0 | 40 | 75.00 | 67.86 | Unqualified | 0 | 11 | 1 | Uncertain | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Weak | Ours | Qualified | 50 | 3 | 0 | 113 | 92.04 | 94.34 | Unqualified | 0 | 49 | 2 | Uncertain | 0 | 4 | 5 | YOLO v4 | Qualified | 17 | 14 | 0 | 40 | 60.00 | 54.84 | Unqualified | 0 | 7 | 0 | Uncertain | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| Strong | Ours | Qualified | 42 | 4 | 0 | 115 | 92.17 | 91.30 | Unqualified | 0 | 54 | 0 | Uncertain | 3 | 2 | 10 | YOLO v4 | Qualified | 20 | 11 | 0 | 40 | 72.50 | 64.52 | Unqualified | 0 | 8 | 0 | Uncertain | 0 | 0 | 1 |
|
|