Research Article
Threshold-Enhanced PROMETHEE Group Decision Support under Uncertainties
Table 12
Sensitivity analysis on differentiated decision power of a single DM (university) with conservative group preference.
| Change of decision power | Alternatives | Note | A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O |
| −50% | 2 | 2 | 1 | 14 | 10 | 2 | 15 | 8 | 10 | 2 | 7 | 13 | 6 | 9 | 12 | | −40% | 2 | 2 | 1 | 14 | 10 | 2 | 15 | 8 | 10 | 2 | 7 | 13 | 6 | 9 | 12 | | −30% | 2 | 2 | 1 | 14 | 10 | 2 | 15 | 8 | 10 | 2 | 7 | 13 | 6 | 9 | 12 | | −20% | 4 | 4 | 1 | 14 | 10 | 2 | 15 | 8 | 10 | 2 | 7 | 13 | 6 | 9 | 12 | | −10% | 4 | 4 | 1 | 14 | 10 | 2 | 15 | 8 | 10 | 2 | 7 | 13 | 6 | 9 | 12 | | 0% | 4 | 4 | 1 | 14 | 10 | 2 | 15 | 8 | 10 | 2 | 7 | 13 | 6 | 9 | 12 | Equal decision power | 10% | 4 | 4 | 1 | 14 | 10 | 2 | 15 | 8 | 10 | 2 | 7 | 13 | 6 | 9 | 12 | | 20% | 4 | 4 | 1 | 14 | 10 | 2 | 15 | 8 | 10 | 2 | 7 | 13 | 6 | 8 | 12 | | 30% | 4 | 4 | 1 | 14 | 10 | 2 | 15 | 8 | 10 | 2 | 7 | 13 | 6 | 8 | 12 | | 40% | 4 | 4 | 1 | 14 | 10 | 2 | 15 | 8 | 10 | 2 | 7 | 13 | 6 | 8 | 12 | | 50% | 4 | 4 | 1 | 14 | 10 | 2 | 15 | 8 | 10 | 2 | 7 | 13 | 6 | 8 | 12 | | Rank changes | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
|
|
Note. The total ranks of changes are 3, whose value is listed in the rightmost cell of the last row.
|