Research Article
An Optimal Design Method for Compliant Mechanisms
Table 11
Case study 2: simulated results.
| Trial | Refined variables (unit: mm) | Frequency | Displacement | Parasitic | Stress | T2 | L2 | T3 | f1 (x) (Hz) | f2 (x) (mm) | f3 (x) (mm) | f4 (x) (MPa) |
| 1 | 0.55 | 25 | 0.66 | 104.0482 | 0.9336 | 0.0124 | 162.7355 | 2 | 0.45 | 22.5 | 0.66 | 99.31841 | 1.0459 | 0.0155 | 153.0472 | 3 | 0.65 | 22.5 | 0.66 | 127.1888 | 0.5806 | 0.0081 | 92.95158 | 4 | 0.45 | 27.5 | 0.66 | 74.18228 | 1.8419 | 0.0211 | 227.1803 | 5 | 0.65 | 27.5 | 0.66 | 107.0481 | 0.8742 | 0.0120 | 117.8249 | 6 | 0.45 | 25 | 0.54 | 88.26316 | 1.2665 | 0.0129 | 152.1337 | 7 | 0.65 | 25 | 0.54 | 101.8941 | 0.8819 | 0.0102 | 109.0929 | 8 | 0.45 | 25 | 0.78 | 102.2331 | 1.0051 | 0.0130 | 150.8916 | 9 | 0.65 | 25 | 0.78 | 128.5677 | 0.6122 | 0.0100 | 105.7656 | 10 | 0.55 | 22.5 | 0.54 | 98.00464 | 0.9620 | 0.0110 | 130.6791 | 11 | 0.55 | 27.5 | 0.54 | 85.37607 | 1.3584 | 0.0155 | 158.0305 | 12 | 0.55 | 22.5 | 0.78 | 123.716 | 0.6666 | 0.0106 | 134.808 | 13 | 0.55 | 27.5 | 0.78 | 96.11523 | 1.1131 | 0.0157 | 159.7465 |
|
|