An Optimal Design Method for Compliant Mechanisms

Table 7

Case study 1: simulated results.

Trial	Refined parameters (unit: mm)				Frequency	Displacement	Parasitic motion	Stress
	T2	L2	T3	L3	f1 (x) (Hz)	f2 (x) (mm)	f3 (x) (mm)	f4 (x) (MPa)
1	0.55	25	0.66	20	104.0482	0.9336	0.0124	162.7355
2	0.45	22.5	0.66	20	99.3184	1.0459	0.0155	153.0472
3	0.65	22.5	0.66	20	127.1888	0.5806	0.0081	92.9516
4	0.45	27.5	0.66	20	74.1823	1.8419	0.0211	227.1803
5	0.65	27.5	0.66	20	107.0481	0.8742	0.0120	117.8249
6	0.55	25	0.54	18	98.7476	1.0189	0.0127	165.1369
7	0.55	25	0.78	18	112.5295	0.8221	0.0127	164.9785
8	0.55	25	0.54	22	85.9801	1.2611	0.0132	158.4125
9	0.55	25	0.78	22	105.5051	0.9183	0.0129	164.3392
10	0.45	25	0.66	18	100.1899	1.0411	0.0130	152.5881
11	0.65	25	0.66	18	124.0486	0.6519	0.0100	107.2939
12	0.45	25	0.66	22	91.6971	1.2088	0.0136	155.6330
13	0.65	25	0.66	22	111.4232	0.7671	0.0102	105.6065
14	0.55	22.5	0.54	20	98.0046	0.9620	0.0110	130.6791
15	0.55	27.5	0.54	20	85.3761	1.3584	0.0155	158.0305
16	0.55	22.5	0.78	20	123.7160	0.6666	0.0106	134.8080
17	0.55	27.5	0.78	20	96.1152	1.1131	0.0157	159.7465
18	0.45	25	0.54	20	88.2632	1.2665	0.0129	152.1337
19	0.65	25	0.54	20	101.8941	0.8819	0.0102	109.0929
20	0.45	25	0.78	20	102.2331	1.0051	0.0130	150.8916
21	0.65	25	0.78	20	128.5677	0.6122	0.0100	105.7656
22	0.55	22.5	0.66	18	121.7163	0.6803	0.0111	135.3569
23	0.55	27.5	0.66	18	94.8892	1.1449	0.0156	161.3298
24	0.55	22.5	0.66	22	106.9204	0.8358	0.0106	134.3837
25	0.55	27.5	0.66	22	87.8279	1.3095	0.0161	150.2442