Research Article
An Optimal Design Method for Compliant Mechanisms
Table 7
Case study 1: simulated results.
| Trial | Refined parameters (unit: mm) | Frequency | Displacement | Parasitic motion | Stress | T2 | L2 | T3 | L3 | f1 (x) (Hz) | f2 (x) (mm) | f3 (x) (mm) | f4 (x) (MPa) |
| 1 | 0.55 | 25 | 0.66 | 20 | 104.0482 | 0.9336 | 0.0124 | 162.7355 | 2 | 0.45 | 22.5 | 0.66 | 20 | 99.3184 | 1.0459 | 0.0155 | 153.0472 | 3 | 0.65 | 22.5 | 0.66 | 20 | 127.1888 | 0.5806 | 0.0081 | 92.9516 | 4 | 0.45 | 27.5 | 0.66 | 20 | 74.1823 | 1.8419 | 0.0211 | 227.1803 | 5 | 0.65 | 27.5 | 0.66 | 20 | 107.0481 | 0.8742 | 0.0120 | 117.8249 | 6 | 0.55 | 25 | 0.54 | 18 | 98.7476 | 1.0189 | 0.0127 | 165.1369 | 7 | 0.55 | 25 | 0.78 | 18 | 112.5295 | 0.8221 | 0.0127 | 164.9785 | 8 | 0.55 | 25 | 0.54 | 22 | 85.9801 | 1.2611 | 0.0132 | 158.4125 | 9 | 0.55 | 25 | 0.78 | 22 | 105.5051 | 0.9183 | 0.0129 | 164.3392 | 10 | 0.45 | 25 | 0.66 | 18 | 100.1899 | 1.0411 | 0.0130 | 152.5881 | 11 | 0.65 | 25 | 0.66 | 18 | 124.0486 | 0.6519 | 0.0100 | 107.2939 | 12 | 0.45 | 25 | 0.66 | 22 | 91.6971 | 1.2088 | 0.0136 | 155.6330 | 13 | 0.65 | 25 | 0.66 | 22 | 111.4232 | 0.7671 | 0.0102 | 105.6065 | 14 | 0.55 | 22.5 | 0.54 | 20 | 98.0046 | 0.9620 | 0.0110 | 130.6791 | 15 | 0.55 | 27.5 | 0.54 | 20 | 85.3761 | 1.3584 | 0.0155 | 158.0305 | 16 | 0.55 | 22.5 | 0.78 | 20 | 123.7160 | 0.6666 | 0.0106 | 134.8080 | 17 | 0.55 | 27.5 | 0.78 | 20 | 96.1152 | 1.1131 | 0.0157 | 159.7465 | 18 | 0.45 | 25 | 0.54 | 20 | 88.2632 | 1.2665 | 0.0129 | 152.1337 | 19 | 0.65 | 25 | 0.54 | 20 | 101.8941 | 0.8819 | 0.0102 | 109.0929 | 20 | 0.45 | 25 | 0.78 | 20 | 102.2331 | 1.0051 | 0.0130 | 150.8916 | 21 | 0.65 | 25 | 0.78 | 20 | 128.5677 | 0.6122 | 0.0100 | 105.7656 | 22 | 0.55 | 22.5 | 0.66 | 18 | 121.7163 | 0.6803 | 0.0111 | 135.3569 | 23 | 0.55 | 27.5 | 0.66 | 18 | 94.8892 | 1.1449 | 0.0156 | 161.3298 | 24 | 0.55 | 22.5 | 0.66 | 22 | 106.9204 | 0.8358 | 0.0106 | 134.3837 | 25 | 0.55 | 27.5 | 0.66 | 22 | 87.8279 | 1.3095 | 0.0161 | 150.2442 |
|
|