Research Article
Edge-Based Convolutional Neural Network for Improving Breast Cancer Prediction Performance
Table 1
Comparative analysis of previous research studies to the proposed work.
| Researches | Technology used | Key benefit | Performance factor | Storage space factor | Accuracy factor | Issues and challenges |
| [4] | CNN | Efficient image classification | No | No | No | Time consumption and space consumption need to be reduced | [7] | CNN and SVM | Fast performance | Yes | No | No | The issue of space consumption and accuracy not resolved | [12] | Random forest algorithm | Handling missing values, no feature scaling required, and less impacted by noise | No | No | No | Complexity and long training period | [22] | Genetic algorithm | It provides good quality solutions in a less time | Yes | No | No | Does not provide the optimal solution | [26] | Bayesian logistic regression | It provides better result that is unbiased, with lower variances | No | No | Yes | Logistic regression is capable of predicting a categorical outcome | [27] | Ensemble convolution neural networks | It offers increased flexibility | Yes | No | No | Does not consider the space and accuracy | [29] | Unsupervised feature extraction algorithm | Ideal to explore raw and unknown data | Yes | No | No | There is a lack of accuracy due to unavailability of labels | Proposed work | CNN and edge detection | ā | Yes | Yes | Yes | The integration of multiple technologies is quite challenging |
|
|