Review Article
Recent Advancements in Autonomous Robots and Their Technical Analysis
Table 5
Summary of all previously proposed control laws for all unmanned vehicles.
| References | Limitations/shortcomings | Vehicle type | TD | OS/US | SC | CE/EN | GL | SSE | EHD | PC | T_proc |
| [7] | | ✓ | ✓ | | ✓ | | | | | UUVs with manipulators | [39] | | | | | | | | ✓ | ✓ | [11] | | ✓ | | ✓ | ✓ | | | | | [6] | | | | | | | | | | [43] | | | | | | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | [40] | | | | ✓ | | | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | [38] | | ✓ | | ✓ | | | | | | [16] | | | ✓ | | | | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | [14] | | | | ✓ | ✓ | | | | | [5] | | | ✓ | | | | ✓ | | | [13] | ✓ | | | | ✓ | ✓ | | | | [53] | | ✓ | | ✓ | | | | | | QUAVs with manipulator design | [50] | | | | | | ✓ | | | ✓ | [52] | | ✓ | | | | | | | | [48] | | | | ✓ | ✓ | | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | [49] | | | ✓ | | | | | | | [47] | | ✓ | | | | | | | | [26] | ✓ | ✓ | | | | ✓ | | | ✓ | [46] | ✓ | ✓ | | ✓ | ✓ | | | | | [27] | | | ✓ | | ✓ | ✓ | | | | [45] | | | | | | | | | ✓ | [44] | | | ✓ | ✓ | | | | | | [56] | ✓ | | | | | | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | UGV with manipulator design | [58] | | | ✓ | | ✓ | ✓ | | | | [29] | | ✓ | | | | | | | | [59] | ✓ | | | | | | | ✓ | | [28] | | ✓ | | ✓ | | ✓ | | | ✓ | [31] | | | | | ✓ | | | | | [30] | ✓ | | ✓ | | | | | | ✓ | [33] | | | | | | | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
|
|
TD: time delay. SC: slow convergence rate. GL: gimbal lock. EHD: expensive hardware. T_proc: process time. OS/US: over/undershoots. CE/EN: chattering effect/external noise effect. SSE: steady-state error. PC: power consumption.
|