Research Article
Quality Checks Logit Human Reliability (LHR): A New Model to Evaluate Human Error Probability (HEP)
Table 11
Comparison of HEP
LHR, HEP
NARA, and HEP
SPAR-H (GTT-A6) to empirical data adapted from [
63].
| | | HEPLHR (%) | HEPData | (%) | HEPNARA | HEPData | (%) | HEPSPAR-H (%) | HEPData | (%) |
| | t = 2 h | 6.45 | 6.45% | 7.12% | −0.67% | 8.56% | 7.12% | 1.44 | 5.26% | 7.12% | | t = 4 h | 7.87 | 7.87% | 8.42% | −0.55% | 9.89% | 8.42% | 1.47 | 6.25% | 8.42% | | t = 6 h | 15.22 | 15.22% | 15.89% | −0.67% | 17.82% | 15.89% | 1.93 | 14.01% | 15.89% | | t = 8 h | 27.18 | 27.18% | 28.89% | −1.71% | 31.33% | 28.89% | 2.44 | 23.50% | 28.89% | | t = 10 h | 34.84 | 34.84% | 34.99% | v0.15% | 36.58% | 34.99% | 1.59 | 31.05% | 34.99% | | t = 12 h | 43.28 | 43.28% | 41.45% | 1.83% | 48.50% | 41.45% | 7.05 | 38.60% | 41.45% | | t = 14 h | 50.90 | 50.90% | 49.56% | 1.34% | 52.63% | 49.56% | 3.07 | 41.01% | 49.56% | | t = 16 h | 56.74 | 56.74% | 51.12% | 5.62% | 59.60% | 51.12% | 8.48 | 49.48% | 51.12% | | t = 18 h | 66.02 | 66.02% | 63.25% | 2.77% | 69.98% | 63.25% | 6.73 | 53.69% | 63.25% | | t = 20 h | 73.85 | 73.85% | 70.58% | 3.27% | 78.36% | 70.58% | 7.78 | 66.65% | 70.58% | | t = 22 h | 90.30 | 90.30% | 85.69% | 4.61% | 89.96% | 85.69% | 4.27 | 75.78% | 85.69% | | t = 24 h | 97.24 | 97.24% | 92.63% | 4.61% | 98.01% | 92.63% | 5.38 | 88.92% | 92.63% | | | | ∑(−technological)LHR | −3.75% | | ∑(−technological)NARA | 0.00% | | ∑(−technological)SPAR-H | −55.39% | | | | MADLHR | 2.32% | | MADNARA | 4.30% | | MADSPAR-H | 4.62% |
|
|
