Research Article
The Mixture of the Marshall–Olkin Extended Weibull Distribution under Type-II Censoring and Different Loss Functions
Table 3
Comparison among MMOEW, EW, MOEW, Weibull, EE, and MOW based on MLEs, the measures AIC, BIC, HQIC, CAIC, and KS, and
value for real data II.
| Distribution | Par. | Estimates | | AIC | BIC | HQIC | CAIC | KS | value |
| MMOEW | | 3.07 | 90.91 | 195.82 | 211.75 | 202.16 | 203.78 | 0.07 | 0.8695 | | 0.51 | | 0.15 | | 1.02 | | 2.54 | | 0.33 | | 0.78 | EW | | 1.55 | 104.70 | 215.40 | 222.23 | 218.12 | 218.81 | 0.09 | 0.6466 | | 1.79 | | 0.69 | MOEW | | 1.86 | 111.13 | 228.27 | 235.10 | 230.98 | 231.68 | 0.09 | 0.5932 | | 1.72 | | 0.40 | MOW | | 2.40 | 107.47 | 220.94 | 227.77 | 223.66 | 224.36 | 0.09 | 0.5301 | | 0.46 | | 0.42 | Weibull | | 2.11 | 111.12 | 226.24 | 230.79 | 228.05 | 228.52 | 0.08 | 0.6951 | | 0.52 | EE | | 5.04 | 102.46 | 208.92 | 213.47 | 210.73 | 211.19 | 0.07 | 0.8247 | | 1.33 |
|
|