Research Article

Technical and Energy Efficiency of Urban Logistics in China: Empirical Analysis of 216 Prefecture-Level Cities

Table 9

Estimation results of the Cobb–Douglas and translog SFA model with density variables.

VariablesCobb–Douglas SFATranslog SFATranslog SFA with impact factorsTranslog SFA with impact factors

Constant−0.772 (−4.611)0.728 (1.154)−0.449 (−0.591)−4.458 (−4.626)
lnK0.397 (14.01)−0.093 (−0.436)0.047 (0.204)−0.989 (−3.92)
lnL0.132 (6.332)0.647 (4.057)0.571 (3.016)1.121 (3.607)
(lnk)20.081 (2.288)0.032 (0.85)−0.635 (−2.57)
(lnl)20.036 (1.481)0.029 (0.891)−0.066 (2.525)
lnKlnL−0.168 (−3.17)−0.05 (−0.805)−0.224 (−4.369)
Lny0.264 (5.479)
(lny)20.227 (2.767)
lnylnk−0.295 (−3.173)
lnylnl0.146 (1.67)
DIGIT0.215 (7.678)−1.274 (−40.087)
ENV0.208 (5.693)−0.115 (−3.196)
GOV1.11 (4.65)1.489 (5.407)
EDU0.037 (0.972)−0.265 (−6.118)
DEN−0.777 (−14.057)0.57 (11.119)
Sigma-squared0.0.758 (12.039)0.768 (11.388)0.407(21.416)0.513 (26.216)
Gamma0.904 (183.011)0.906 (172.702)0.153 (0.985)0.016 (0.355)
Mu1.656 (15.195)1.668 (14.706)
Eta0.01 (5.111)0.011 (7.035)
LLP−721.105−715.597−1858.923−2104.425
Λ11.015

Notes: , , and denote statistical significance at 10%, 5%, and 1% levels, respectively.