Research Article
Integration of Interpretive Structural Modeling with Fuzzy Bayesian Network for Risk Assessment of Tunnel Collapse
Table 12
Sensitivity analysis result.
| Risk factor | Probability of occurrence (%) | Original collapse probability (%) | New collapse probability (%) | Probability change (%) |
| Excessive construction disturbance | 21.2 | 17.7 | 31.1 | 13.4 | Insufficient support strength | 15.4 | 17.7 | 30.2 | 12.5 | Improper construction measures or poor quality | 14.0 | 17.7 | 20.3 | 2.6 | Unreasonable design | 7.7 | 17.7 | 19.9 | 2.2 | Untimely support | 14.6 | 17.7 | 18.7 | 1.0 | Severe bias | 10.8 | 17.7 | 18.6 | 0.9 | Irregular construction | 23.4 | 17.7 | 18.5 | 0.8 | Low level of management awareness | 16.0 | 17.7 | 18.3 | 0.6 | Poor stability of surrounding rock | 65.1 | 17.7 | 18.0 | 0.3 | Special poor geological conditions | 26.5 | 17.7 | 18.0 | 0.3 | Failure of monitoring and measurement standards | 6.8 | 17.7 | 17.8 | 0.1 | Atmospheric rainfall | 27.1 | 17.7 | 17.8 | 0.1 | Shallow buried | 15.4 | 17.7 | 17.7 | 0.0 | Mutation of geological conditions | 7.1 | 17.7 | 17.7 | 0.0 | Groundwater seepage | 32.4 | 17.7 | 17.7 | 0.0 | Inaccurate geological survey | 15.7 | 17.7 | 17.7 | 0.0 | Inadequate advance geological forecast | 4.4 | 17.7 | 17.7 | 0.0 |
|
|