Gray Relation Analysis for Optimal Selection of Bridge Reinforcement Scheme Based on Fuzzy-AHP Weights

Tan, Yanbin; Zhang, Zhe; Wang, Huili; Zhou, Shaobo

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8813940

Mathematical Problems in Engineering

On this page

Abstract Introduction Conclusion Data Availability Conflicts of Interest Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Special Issue

Artificial Intelligence for Civil Engineering

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2021 | Article ID 8813940 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8813940

Gray Relation Analysis for Optimal Selection of Bridge Reinforcement Scheme Based on Fuzzy-AHP Weights

Yanbin Tan,¹Zhe Zhang,¹Huili Wang,^1,2and Shaobo Zhou¹

Academic Editor: Yung-Chung Wang

Received16 Sept 2020

Accepted06 Jul 2021

Published23 Jul 2021

Abstract

In order to solve the problem on optimal selection of old bridge reinforcement schemes, a decision-making method of gray relation analysis based on fuzzy-AHP weights is proposed. Firstly, the fuzzy-AHP is used to develop the decision index system of old bridge reinforcement schemes and determine the weight of decision indexes. The 0.1–0.9 scale method is introduced as the index judgment criterion, and the weight judgment matrix is established. Through the consistency test, the relative weight vector of each decision index in the index layer is calculated. Secondly, according to the gray relation model of the old bridge reinforcement schemes, the decision matrix is constructed, and the gray relation coefficient matrix is calculated to obtain the gray relation coefficient corresponding to the ideal optimal scheme. Finally, the optimal scheme is determined. Through an engineering example, the reinforcement scheme of a concrete-filled steel tube arch bridge deck system is calculated and analyzed, and the best reinforcement scheme is selected. The optimal selection result is consistent with the actual reinforcement scheme available for the bridge. The decision-making method of gray relation analysis based on fuzzy-AHP weights make the evaluation system more organized and systematic and the index weight more operable and quantitative, reduce the subjective evaluation impact, and make the evaluation result more objective and reliable. Considering the fuzzy and gray information of comparison and selection, the optimal scheme with high feasibility and applicability is selected by the gray relation method.

1. Introduction

With the operation of in-service bridges, due to the increase of traffic volume and vehicle load, the influence of unfavorable factors in the surrounding environment, and the natural aging of materials, the bridge structure is faced with performance degradation during its life cycle, resulting in the weakening of its function. In order to meet the traffic development needs, ensure the safety of bridge structure, satisfy the use function, and extend the service life, it is necessary to reconstruct and reinforce the old bridges. Many bridge reinforcement methods are now available, such as reinforcing the main girder cross section, reducing the dead load, and changing the structural system. These methods comprehensively consider the bearing capacity, durability, impact of traffic interruption, economic rationality of reinforcement cost, and complexity of reinforcement technology. The determination of the reinforcement scheme is the key to the success of the reconstruction and reinforcement, especially the feasibility, reliability, and economy of the reinforcement scheme. The optimal selection process of the old bridge reinforcement scheme is a multiobjective decision-making process. The multiobjective decision-making is characterized by the conflicting objectives, inconsistent objective dimensions, and adjustable “optimal solution,” making the decision-making process more complicated [1]. Dağdeviren and Yüksel developed the evaluation index system of bridge reinforcement schemes based on the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and performed the optimal selection analysis [2]. Nguyen et al. established a two-level fuzzy optimal selection model and used the nonstructural fuzzy decision-making theory for the bridge scheme comparison and selection [3]. Maghrabie et al. proposed a multilayer and multiobjective fuzzy optimal selection model and applied it to the comparison and optimal selection of bridge schemes [4]. Thakur and Ramesh combined the AHP method and the entropy method to weigh the evaluation indexes and established the gray relation method based on the combined weight for the optimal selection of bridge reinforcement schemes [5]. Li and Chen proposed to improve the fuzzy belief structure method to determine the weight and established the gray relation optimal selection model for the optimal selection research of bridge reinforcement schemes [6]. Kalemci et al. used the combined weight method to establish a simplified gray wolf optimization algorithm method model for the optimal selection of bridge reinforcement schemes [7]. For this reason, according to the characteristics of the old bridge reinforcement scheme evaluation, this paper organically combines the fuzzy theory [8–11] with AHP, proposes a method to determine the index weight, and adopts the gray relation method [12] to realize the comprehensive evaluation of each reinforcement alternative and thus the selection of optimal scheme, making the optimal selection process more simple, objective, reasonable, and reliable. Therefore, it is necessary to carry out the optimal selection of bridge reinforcement schemes in order to achieve the basic objectives in technical feasibility, reliability, economic rationality, construction simplicity, and quality assurance.

In this paper, four bridge reinforcement schemes for an old bridge are carried out. Many factors need to be considered, such as the aging and disease degree of the original structure, the technical feasibility, and the impact of traffic interruption, which are more risky and difficult compared with the new bridge construction. In order to solve the problem on optimal selection of old bridge reinforcement schemes, a decision-making method of gray relation analysis based on fuzzy-AHP weights is proposed.

2. Evaluation Index System

Since several optimal selection indexes need to be comprehensively considered in the decision-making process for optimal selection of old bridge reinforcement schemes, the fuzzy-AHP [13] shall be firstly used to organize and hierarchize the optimal selection problem, thus developing a hierarchy-based optimal selection index system, as shown in Table 1. The system is divided into three layers: the first layer mainly includes the optimal selection purpose or desirable result, that is, to determine the optimal reinforcement scheme; the second layer includes the subordinate indexes of the upper layer, which represent the optimal selection index factors to be satisfied before the optimal selection purpose is achieved; the third layer is the basic index layer, which includes the most basic decomposition indexes of the optimal selection problem and directly reflects the comprehensive attribute information of each reinforcement scheme.

3. Decision Index Weight Determined by Fuzzy-AHP

3.1. Construction of Fuzzy Complementary Judgment Matrix

Based on the principle of fuzzy-AHP, the mutual priority relationship among the decision indexes is determined, and the 0.1–0.9 scale method [14] is used as the judgment criterion for the pairwise comparison of the indexes to establish the weight judgment matrix :where is the relative weight vector based on the jth decision index than the ith decision.

3.2. Consistency Check of Judgment Matrix

The weight vector of matrix C is obtained by solving the judgment matrix with the formula derived in [15] :

Set

Then, the N-order matrix is taken as the characteristic matrix of the judgment matrix C. The compatibility index of C and S is

With regard to the attitude of the decision maker, when the compatibility index , the judgment matrix is considered to be satisfactorily consistent. The smaller the , the higher the consistency requirement for the matrix, which is generally taken as .

Assuming there are k experts, then the fuzzy judgment matrix ; when , the corresponding weight vector set [15], and the characteristic matrix . If t judgment matrices B(k) and other judgment matrices are of satisfactory consistency, the fuzzy-AHP weight is

3.3. Total Hierarchical Sorting

Assuming that, in a decision index system with r layers, the relative weight vector based on the hth decision index is ; when , the order matrix iswhere is the relative weight vector based on the hth decision index than the hth decision.

If the comprehensive weight vector matrix of all decision indexes from the layer to the decision layer is [16], then the comprehensive weight of all decision indexes from the r layer to the decision layer is

Generally,where is actually the same as the relative weight vector under the single hierarchical sorting.

4. Gray Relation Analysis Model

It is difficult to obtain the optimal scheme by a gray system composed of known information and nondeterministic information. The gray relation analysis method [17] is a method to measure the relation degree among factors based on their similarity or dissimilarity in the development trend [18], which is suitable for solving the problem on multiobjective optimal selection decision-making of old bridge reinforcement design schemes.

4.1. Construction of Decision Matrix

Assuming that there are a total of m old bridge reinforcement schemes and a total of n decision indexes and represents the attribute value of the jth index of the ith beam design scheme, then the initial decision matrix is

In the decision-making objectives of the old bridge reinforcement design schemes, for the decision index value corresponding to the bearing capacity, the higher is better, while for the decision index value corresponding to the economic indexes such as construction period and cost, the lower is better. Moreover, the different dimensions and orders of magnitude among decision indexes have a large impact on the evaluation and optimal selection of the beam design scheme. Therefore, in order to facilitate the gray relation analysis, all decision indexes of the beam design scheme are normalized [19].

4.1.1. Quantitative Index Processing

In the evaluation index system of old bridge reinforcement scheme, some evaluation indexes can be expressed by numerical values and directly used as quantitative indexes of the scheme, such as the reinforcement cost and construction period. Quantitative indexes can be processed as follows. For benefit indexes (the larger the attribute value is, the better), the dimensionless value is

For cost indexes (the smaller the attribute value is, the better), the dimensionless value iswhere is the index value of the ith index for the jth scheme to be evaluated, is the normalized value, is the minimum index value in the ith evaluation index of each scheme, i.e., , and is the maximum index value in the ith evaluation index of each scheme, i.e., , where and .

4.1.2. Qualitative Index Processing

Some evaluation indexes in the evaluation index system of old bridge reinforcement scheme belong to qualitative indexes which can only be used for qualitative estimation and judgment. According to the needs of old bridge reinforcement, a 9-level factor set [20] is adopted, E = (worst, very poor, poor, relatively poor, medium, relatively good, good, very good, best), and the qualitative index language gray number is quantified by the linear gray number whitening weight function [21]. The quantification results are shown in Table 2.

4.2. Construction of Gray Relation Coefficient Matrix

Due to the relativity of bridge reinforcement scheme decision during comparison, an ideal reference scheme [22] is firstly constructed as , wherewhere is the relative vector based on the jth decision index than the ith decision.

The ideal reference scheme can be understood as taking the best value of the corresponding evaluation index in all candidate design schemes as the reference sequence. The attribute values of decision indexes of m design schemes are, respectively, taken as the comparison sequences, and the relation coefficient is used to measure the closeness of the data relationship between the reference sequence and the comparison sequence. The calculation formula of the relation coefficient of each decision index under different design schemes iswhere is the relation coefficient between the ith comparison sequence and the jth index in the reference sequence , and , and is the identification coefficient () and is generally taken as .

4.3. Calculation of Gray Relation Degree

Combined with the fuzzy-AHP, the comprehensive weight vector matrix of all decision indexes at the third layer of the decision index system of the old bridge reinforcement scheme is determined as , and the comprehensive weight vector of n decision indexes to the decision layer in the decision index system iswhere is the relative vector based on the nth decision index than all decision indexes at the third layer of the decision.

Let be the combined weight of the kth index, and [23]. So, the gray relation degree between the old bridge reinforcement scheme and the ideal scheme iswhere is the calculation formula of the relation coefficient of each decision index under different design schemes and is the relative vector based on the jth decision index than all decision indexes at the third layer of the decision.

4.4. Determination of Optimal Scheme

Firstly, according to the gray correlation degree, the evaluation schemes are sorted and optimized: the larger the relation degree is, the closer the reinforcement scheme is to the ideal scheme, and thus, the better the reinforcement scheme is, so as to determine the optimal scheme in the old bridge reinforcement schemes.

According to the gray relation axiom, gray relation degree satisfies(1)Normative , (2)The smaller the proximity , the greater the

Normativeness limits the value of gray correlation degree within the interval of [0, 1]. Proximity indicates that the closer the two behaviors are, the more similar their changing trends are.

The evaluated schemes are sorted for optimal selection according to the gray relation degree: the larger the relation degree, the closer the reinforcement scheme is to the ideal scheme, and thus the better the reinforcement scheme, so as to determine the optimal scheme in the old bridge reinforcement schemes.

5. Example of Decision-Making for Optimal Selection of Old Bridge Reinforcement Schemes

5.1. General Situation and Reinforcement Schemes of Old Bridge

This paper takes the deck system reinforcement design schemes of a certain reinforced concrete ribbed arch bridge as an example, uses the fuzzy-AHP to determine the weight and gray relation analysis model for the optimal selection, and obtains the optimal reinforcement scheme, as well as verifies the effectiveness and practicability of the gray relation analysis method for the optimal selection of bridge reinforcement schemes based on fuzzy-AHP weights.

The bridge is a concrete-filled steel tube arch bridge, which was completed in July 1997, as shown in Figure 1. With the development of the city and the increase of traffic volume, the original design has approached the bearing capacity limit; the structure vibration is more obvious in actual use. Later, the bridge has been reinforced, with a hope to improve the dynamic characteristics and reduce the structural vibration response, but the reinforcement effect was not obvious. A total of four bridge deck reinforcement schemes are proposed this time: scheme 1, replace the overall bridge deck; scheme 2, add longitudinal concrete beams; scheme 3, add longitudinal steel beams; scheme 4, add longitudinal steel box-concrete composite beams, as shown in Figure 2.

(a)

(b)

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

5.2. Determination of Comprehensive Weight of Decision Indexes

As for determination on the relative weight of decision indexes at each layer of the old bridge reinforcement scheme, the pairwise comparison of structural functionality S, economic rationality E, technical feasibility F, and structural aesthetics A are conducted according to the 0.1–0.9 scale method, to obtain the fuzzy complementary judgment matrix, see Table 3, for details.

According to formulas (1) and (2), the relative weight vector of the factor set is calculated as

According to formulas (3) and (4), the compatibility index of and is obtained as , and the distribution of the relative weight vector of the corresponding objective layer is reasonable. Therefore, it is believed that the fuzzy judgment matrices are satisfactorily compatible. In conclusion, it is reasonable and reliable to use the mean value of the relative weight set as the relative weight vector of the objective layer. The relative weight vector of the objective layer is = (0.308, 0.242, 0.258, 0.192).

Similarly, by constructing the fuzzy judgment matrix of the index layer, the relative weight vector of each decision index of the index layer is calculated, and thus, the comprehensive weight is calculated by formulas (6)∼(8), as shown in Table 4.

5.3. Calculation of Gray Relation Degree

According to formulas (9)∼(11), a decision matrix is established to select the optimal value of each index and determine the optimal scheme:

The gray relation coefficient matrix is calculated by formulas (12) and (13):

According to the comprehensive weight of decision index obtained in Table 4, the gray relation degree between each old bridge reinforcement scheme and the ideal optimal scheme is calculated by formulas (14) and (15):

It can be seen that the gray relation degree between scheme 4 and ideal optimal scheme is the largest, so scheme 4 “add longitudinal steel box-concrete composite beams” is the optimal scheme. The optimum selection result is consistent with the actual reinforcement scheme adopted.

6. Conclusion

(1)The fuzzy-AHP is used to construct the decision index system of the old bridge reinforcement scheme and determine the weight of the decision index, which makes the evaluation system more organized and systematic, and the index weight is more operable and quantitative, reducing the subjective evaluation impact and making the evaluation result more objective and reliable(2)Fully considering the fuzzy and gray information of comparison and selection, the gray relation method is used for calculation and analysis of old bridge reinforcement schemes, thus selecting the optimal reinforcement scheme(3)For the optimal selection of bridge reinforcement schemes, the gray relation analysis based on fuzzy-AHP weights can select the optimal reinforcement scheme as a reference for the bridge reinforcement project and has a certain practical application value

Data Availability

All data, models, and codes generated or used during the study are included within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation Projects of Liaoning Province (2019-ZD-0006 and 2019-ZD-0145).

References

Y. Kuo, T. Yang, and G.-W. Huang, “The use of grey relational analysis in solving multiple attribute decision-making problems,” Computers & Industrial Engineering, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 80–93, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Dağdeviren and İ. Yüksel, “Developing a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (AHP) model for behavior-based safety management,” Information Sciences, vol. 178, no. 6, pp. 1717–1733, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H.-T. Nguyen, S. Z. M. Dawal, Y. Nukman, and H. Aoyama, “A hybrid approach for fuzzy multi-attribute decision making in machine tool selection with consideration of the interactions of attributes,” Expert Systems With Applications, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 3078–3090, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. F. Maghrabie, Y. Beauregard, and A. Schiffauerova, “Grey-based multi-criteria decision analysis approach: addressing uncertainty at complex decision problems,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 146, pp. 366–379, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Thakur and A. Ramesh, “Healthcare waste disposal strategy selection using grey-AHP approach,” Benchmarking: An International Journal, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 735–749, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Li and L. Chen, “A novel evidential FMEA method by integrating fuzzy belief structure and grey relational projection method,” Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, vol. 77, pp. 136–147, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. N. Kalemci, S. B. İkizler, T. Dede, and Z. Angın, “Design of reinforced concrete cantilever retaining wall using grey wolf optimization algorithm,” Structures, vol. 23, pp. 245–253, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Hafezalkotob, A. Hafezalkotob, H. Liao, and F. Herrera, “An overview of MULTIMOORA for multi-criteria decision-making: theory, developments, applications, and challenges,” Information Fusion, vol. 51, pp. 145–177, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. S. A. Khan and S. Abdullah, “Interval-valued pythagorean fuzzy GRA method for multiple-attribute decision making with incomplete weight information,” International Journal of Intelligent Systems, vol. 33, no. 8, pp. 1689–1716, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Naderpour, M. Mirrashid, and K. Nagai, “An innovative approach for bond strength modeling in FRP strip-to-concrete joints using adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system,” Engineering with Computers, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 1083–1100, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Z. Wang and C. Chen, “Fuzzy comprehensive Bayesian network-based safety risk assessment for metro construction projects,” Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, vol. 70, pp. 330–342, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. L. Deng, “Introduction to Grey system theory,” Journal of Grey System, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–24, 1989.
View at: Google Scholar
L. A. Zadeh, “Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 100, no. 1, pp. 9–34, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. D. Cheng, J.-R. Chen, C. Glazier et al., “Novel approach to pavement cracking detection based on fuzzy set theory,” Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 270–280, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q. Zhou and V. V. Thai, “Fuzzy and grey theories in failure mode and effect analysis for tanker equipment failure prediction,” Safety Science, vol. 83, pp. 74–79, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. M. Sefidian and N. Daneshpour, “Missing value imputation using a novel grey based fuzzy c-means, mutual information based feature selection, and regression model,” Expert Systems With Applications, vol. 115, pp. 68–94, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. Bayane, A. Mankar, E. Brühwiler, and J. D. Sørensen, “Quantification of traffic and temperature effects on the fatigue safety of a reinforced-concrete bridge deck based on monitoring data,” Engineering Structures, vol. 196, Article ID 109357, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Liu, Y. Yang, N. Xie, and J. Forrest, “New progress of grey system theory in the new millennium,” Grey Systems: Theory and Application, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 2–31, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Wang, Y.-M. Zhang, and Z. Yang, “A risk evaluation method to prioritize failure modes based on failure data and a combination of fuzzy sets theory and grey theory,” Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, vol. 82, pp. 216–225, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Yazdani, C. Kahraman, P. Zarate, and S. C. Onar, “A fuzzy multi attribute decision framework with integration of QFD and grey relational analysis,” Expert Systems With Applications, vol. 115, pp. 474–485, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Sasmal, K. Ramanjaneyulu, S. Gopalakrishnan, and N. Lakshmanan, “Fuzzy logic based condition rating of existing reinforced concrete bridges,” Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 261–273, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Di Sarno, C. Del Vecchio, G. Maddaloni, and A. Prota, “Experimental response of an existing RC bridge with smooth bars and preliminary numerical simulations,” Engineering Structures, vol. 136, pp. 355–368, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Xue, P. H. A. J. M. Van Gelder, G. Reniers, E. Papadimitriou, and C. Wu, “Multi-attribute decision-making method for prioritizing maritime traffic safety influencing factors of autonomous ships’ maneuvering decisions using grey and fuzzy theories,” Safety Science, vol. 120, pp. 323–340, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2021 Yanbin Tan et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

342

Downloads

565

Citations