| Problem | Reference | Optimal solution | Optimal optimum |
| 1 | Locatelli [17] | (1.3148, 0.1396, 0.0000, 0.4233) | 0.890190 | Shen and Wang [18] | (1.3148, 0.1396, 0.0000, 0.4233) | 0.890190 | Liu and Zhao [8] | (1.3148, 0.13955, 2.6891 , 0.42329) | 0.890190 | Algorithms 1/2 | (1.3148, 0.1396, 0.0000, 0.4233) | 0.890190 |
| 2 | Locatelli [17] | (3.000, 2.000) | 5.014514 | Shen and Wang [18] | (3.000, 2.000) | 5.009309 | Liu and Zhao [8] | (3.000, 2.000) | 5.009309 | Algorithm 1 | (3.000, 2.000) | 5.009309 | Algorithm 2 | (3.000, 2.000) | 5.009309 |
| 3 | Liu and Zhao [8] | (1, 1) | 997.661265 | Locatelli [17] | (1, 1) | 997.661265 | Shen and Wang [18] | (1, 1) | 997.661265 | Algorithm 1/2 | (1, 1) | 997.661265 |
| 4 | Shen and Hang [20] | (2, 8) | 10 | Algorithm 1/2 | (2, 8) | 10 |
| 5 | Zhang et al. [19] | (0.0, 8.0, 1.0, …) | 0.91235 | Algorithm 1 | (0.0, 8.0, 1.0, …) | 0.91235 | Algorithm 2 | (0.0, 8.0, 1.0, …) | 0.91235 |
| 6 | Liu and Zhao [8] | (1.25, 1) | 263.785989 | Algorithm 1 | (1.25, 1) | 263.785989 | Algorithm 2 | (1.25, 1) | 263.785989 |
|
|