Research Article
A Deep Learning Framework for Leukemia Cancer Detection in Microscopic Blood Samples Using Squeeze and Excitation Learning
Table 5
Comparison with traditional deep learning model using ALLIDB1+ ALLIDB2 database.
| Comparison of traditional deep learning model with the proposed model | Run# | Model | Loss value | Accuracy (%) | Precision (%) | Recall (%) | FScore (%) |
| 1 | CNN | 0.92 | 95 | 95 | 94.5 | 94.5 | 2 | CNN | 1.67 | 92 | 92 | 92 | 91.5 | 3 | CNN | 1.73 | 91.4 | 90.5 | 92 | 91.5 | Average | CNN | 1.44 | 92.8 | 92.5 | 95.28 | 92.5 | 1 | Proposed | 0.16 | 97 | 97 | 97 | 97 | 2 | Proposed | 0.092 | 99 | 98.5 | 98.5 | 98.5 | 3 | Proposed | 0.099 | 99 | 99 | 99 | 99 | Average | Proposed | 0.117 | 98.3 | 98.16 | 98.16 | 98.43 |
|
|