Research Article
Hybrid Deep Learning Approaches for sEMG Signal-Based Lower Limb Activity Recognition
Table 5
Comparison of the proposed method’s performance with studies using same dataset (in %).
| Approach | Subject | Accuracy | Walking | Sitting | Standing |
| EMD [41] | Healthy | 64 | 67 | 69 | MEMD [41] | Healthy | 73 | 79 | 82 | NA-EMD [41] | Healthy | 79 | 83 | 83 | MP-ANN [42] | Knee deformity | 88 | 94 | 92 | LRCN [43] | Healthy | 98.2 | 97.7 | 98.4 | Knee deformity | 92.8 | 92.3 | 92.2 | ICA-EBM [36] | Healthy | 96.0 | 96.2 | 96.2 | Knee deformity | 86.6 | 86.4 | 85.5 | WD-EEMD [34] | Healthy | 85.11 | 88.70 | 93.50 | Knee deformity | 98.86 | 96.38 | 96.77 | V-1D-CNN [37] | Healthy | 96.86 | 99.57 | 99.98 | Knee deformity | 99.06 | 96.04 | 97.24 | CNN-GRU (proposed) | Healthy | 99.09 | 100 | 100 | Knee deformity | 99.60 | 98.30 | 97.95 |
|
|