Research Article
Research on the Design of Surgical Auxiliary Equipment Based on AHP, QFD, and PUGH Decision Matrix
Table 4
Questionnaire survey results.
| Indicators | 4 points | 3 points | 2 points | 1 point | Scores |
| Reasonable modeling size | 12 | 11 | 5 | 2 | 93 | Harmonious modeling proportion | 12 | 13 | 3 | 2 | 95 | Simple and clear colors | 9 | 7 | 11 | 3 | 82 | Coordinated colour matching | 10 | 8 | 10 | 2 | 86 | Reasonable equipment decoration | 7 | 14 | 6 | 3 | 85 | Safe modeling | 23 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 113 | Strong and durable structure | 13 | 8 | 7 | 2 | 92 | Low rate of misoperation | 25 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 114 | Components work stably | 13 | 7 | 7 | 3 | 90 | Safe material process | 8 | 7 | 10 | 5 | 78 | Clear operating instructions | 20 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 109 | Accurate manipulator motion | 17 | 8 | 5 | 0 | 102 | High working efficiency of the manipulator | 15 | 12 | 2 | 1 | 101 | Reasonable man-machine dimensions | 13 | 10 | 5 | 2 | 94 | Intelligent interaction | 12 | 10 | 6 | 2 | 92 | Fast and accurate movement | 7 | 10 | 10 | 3 | 81 | Low noise | 8 | 10 | 9 | 3 | 83 | Energy saving | 4 | 6 | 12 | 8 | 66 | Low equipment cost | 6 | 7 | 13 | 4 | 75 | Easy maintenance of equipment | 7 | 7 | 12 | 4 | 77 |
|
|